"Suggested a truckload of money, he said it would have to be two": Gary Anderson adamant about no Premier League spot says Chris Mason
PDCWith the Premier League Darts line-up looming and the World Championship still unfolding, Chris Mason sees the selection as controversial as it's ever been.
ADVERTISEMENT
Speaking to Online Darts before the semi-finals of the PDC World Darts Championship, Mason explained that what once looked like a clear-cut list has become increasingly complicated, with players moving in and out of the top four and others forcing their way into contention late in the season. “It’s quite complex,” Mason said. “Especially with players entering the top four, then going out of the top four, and then other players going ahead of them. I think Gian van Veen and Josh Rock are in.”
Who they replace, however, is far from straightforward. “Every year we try and predict it and they always throw us a curveball,” he added. “Obviously the Lukes are in, MVG’s in, I think van Veen’s in, Rock’s in, and then it’s just a minefield.”
That uncertainty is only heightened by what happens at the business end of the World Championship. Mason pointed out that a single result could dramatically alter the picture. “What if Gary Anderson wins tonight? One of them’s going to play, the other one isn’t, and that causes even further headaches.”
Read also
The most awkward scenario, Mason believes, would be Anderson lifting the world title and then opting out of the Premier League altogether with the line-up confirmed days after the World final.
“If Gary wins it and then doesn’t play in it, I don’t think it’s a good look, and I don’t think Sky would be particularly happy that their world champion isn’t competing weekly on their channel.”
Only two truckloads would make Anderson even consider Premier League
ADVERTISEMENT
While it remains hypothetical, Mason confirmed Anderson has been clear about his stance. “He’s adamant. We’ve had many conversations with him. He went, ‘Mate, I ain’t playing.’ I suggested a truckload of money, he said it would have to be two truckloads.”
Beyond individual decisions, Mason feels this season has been unusual in that many players have performed consistently well without necessarily winning titles — largely due to domination by Luke Humphries and Luke Littler. “So many players have had good seasons, not necessarily winning seasons, because the big ones have been dominated by the two Lukes. Apart from Gian van Veen winning, hardly anybody else has won anything.”
That context, Mason says, should matter when judging candidates. One player he expects to be strongly considered is Stephen Bunting, despite a late-season dip. “For Bunting, it was too good too early. He ran out of steam towards the back end, finished bottom last year, but he’s incredibly popular. They may well shoehorn him in.”
Recency bias and a case for Aspinall and Price
More difficult decisions come with proven names like James Wade and Gerwyn Price. “They’re both top 10 players who’ve had good seasons. Especially Wade, he’s made two major finals, Matchplay being one of them, but then he comes here and hasn’t delivered. That’s the problem.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Mason believes recency bias plays a major role in public debate, but insists Price remains a serious contender. “It wouldn’t surprise me if they put Price in because he’s box office. They know he can do it.”
He also highlighted how perceptions can quickly shift. Last year’s controversial inclusions, Nathan Aspinall and Price, both ended up reaching the play-offs. “Aspinall’s had a great year — eight finals, three European Tour wins. They know he’s capable of turning up every week and entertaining the fans. He’s popular.”
That leaves the Premier League selectors with what Mason describes as “about ten” viable names — including Jonny Clayton, a situation Mason finds particularly uncomfortable. “How can they leave Jonny out when he’s world number five, the highest-ranked Welshman, and a proven winner in the competition? It’s hard. I don’t envy them.”
Read also
New format perhaps needed
ADVERTISEMENT
With the list bursting at the seams, Mason believes the time may have come to rethink the format entirely. “If ever there was a case to go to ten, it’s now. Or my idea, go to twelve.”
Mason outlined a radical structure involving home-and-away fixtures, relegation after four weeks, and a return to the current format to decide finals night. “That solves a lot of problems. Fans get six matches a night, you could reintroduce the draw, the bookies would love it, and it adds jeopardy. We wouldn’t see the same matches week in, week out.”
He added that feedback from fans suggests repetition has become an issue. “We speak to a lot of darts fans and some got bored with it very quickly. There’s no right or wrong, but there’s a grey area where I think it could be improved — for the players as well, because it’s a lot on them.”
Pressed for his own picks, Mason reluctantly named his preferred options. “I’d put Price back in because he made the play-offs. I’d probably put Jonny Clayton… or Danny Noppert.”
Noppert, Mason believes, has been overlooked despite an excellent year. “He’s gone under the radar. Five TV semi-finals, a previous major winner, and he lost in arguably the game of the tournament.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Ultimately, Mason says personal preference plays a part. “I like watching Price. I like watching Aspinall. They give you everything week in, week out.”
Whoever makes the cut, Mason expects Monday’s announcement to dominate headlines. “It’s going to be big news this year because some real big names are going to be left out. It wouldn’t surprise me if they went totally rogue.”
DIsmisses MVG needs a year
He stressed that Premier League selection has never been purely ranking-based. “If it was, it would just be the top eight. They’ve given themselves the wildcard option to give fans what they want.”
And fans, Mason says, are turning out in record numbers. “Ticket sales were through the roof last year. All the analytics were up. Huge arenas are sold out without even knowing the line-up.”
ADVERTISEMENT
That popularity explains why players are so desperate to be involved though Mason dismissed the idea that Michael van Gerwen would benefit from a year out. “He’s one of those players who plays better the more he plays. If he wasn’t in it, I think he’d spend too much time not playing, and that wouldn’t be good for him.”
As for the romantic notion of one final Premier League run for Gary Anderson, Mason admits it’s something everyone would love, but understands why it’s unlikely. “It’s not the darts that does you, it’s the travel. At his age, that’s brutal.”
Still, Mason concluded, the fact Anderson remains competitive says everything. “He’s had a wonderful tournament, and why not? That’s what it’s all about.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026








