“It doesn’t feel good, especially when you lose like this” – Bitter disappointment for Gian van Veen after heavy defeat in PDC World Darts Championship final against Littler
PDCGian van Veen ended his first PDC World Darts Championship final with a clear defeat. At Alexandra Palace, Luke Littler proved far too strong for the Dutchman with a 7-1 sets win, and afterwards Van Veen made no excuses as he openly identified where the match turned. A missed chance in the second set proved decisive in hindsight.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Not the outcome I wanted, of course,” Van Veen said immediately afterwards during his press conference. “I said before the game that I wanted to win this title, but first of all I wanted to give Luke a game, because he’s a fantastic player. I wanted it to be close, because I knew if it was close, I’d have a chance. That didn’t happen today.”
Van Veen started the final without hesitation and kept pace with Littler in the opening phase. The Dutchman even had opportunities to seize control early. "I missed a dart to go 2–0 up in sets," he said. “Looking back, that was probably the game.”
That missed set gave Littler exactly what he needed. “It gave him confidence,” Van Veen noted. "From then on he was outscoring me, I missed a few darts at doubles, he was out-finishing me — and there’s no stopping Luke Littler at that moment.” The pattern became clear quickly. Throughout the tournament, Van Veen often got a second chance after missing a dart at double, but against Littler that chance rarely came. “He puts you under pressure in every leg, every set,” Van Veen explained. “You can’t miss too much. If you leave a double after twelve darts, you usually don’t get a second chance.”
Read also
Littler ruthless at the key moments
The final wasn’t decided by one bad spell from Van Veen, but by Littler’s consistency in the crucial moments. "I left doubles after nine or twelve a lot, and if I missed, that was it. He punished me every time," he stated.
According to the Dutchman, that’s the difference. “He puts you under so much pressure. I did that well against other players this tournament, but not today.” The second set in particular stuck with him. “Especially that 127 checkout on double eight,” Van Veen said. "The leg before, I missed it on the wire, and then Luke took out 60 on the last dart — and he kept doing that all match."
ADVERTISEMENT
The sense of inevitability grew quickly. “You see him there every time: inside, outside, double, last dart. And then he starts the next leg with 140, 180. That hurts.”
Van Veen admitted he felt how the match was unfolding even during play. “When I was 5-1 and 6-1 down, I knew Luke wouldn’t collapse,” he said. “He knows what it’s like to become world champion. He keeps piling on pressure, doesn’t miss match darts.”
The 7-1 scoreline was harsh, but didn’t come out of nowhere for Van Veen. “It’s a heavy defeat,” he acknowledged. “Especially in a World Championship final. But I didn’t play badly. Luke was just much better today.”
Not even the unusual stoppage, when the board was replaced due to blood after a small accident during the break, was something Van Veen wanted to cite. “It was my left hand,” he said. “It didn’t affect my game.”
He also stayed calm about the now infamous ‘Ally Pally wasp.’ “It comes with the territory,” he said. “This was my first time with the wasp.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Disappointment dominates, pride will follow
The immediate feeling afterwards was disappointment. "Right now, though, you’ve just lost a World Championship final, and especially losing 7–1, that hurts," van Veen said. At the same time, he knew the appreciation for his tournament would come later. "In a couple of days or weeks I’ll be very, very proud. Not yet.”
That feeling is understandable given the path Van Veen took in London. Before this year, he hadn’t won a match at Alexandra Palace. At this World Championship he beat Gary Anderson and Luke Humphries, both former world champions. “It feels different now,” he said. “But half an hour later I’m of course proud of what I produced this tournament.”
Read also
Van Veen believes the defeat will shape his development. “It will drive me on a lot,” he said. “Now I know what it’s like to play in a final, and I also know what it’s like to lose one." He was candid about it. “It doesn’t feel good, especially when you lose like this. But if I’m ever in a final again, I’ll know what to expect.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The final capped an exceptional year for Van Veen. He became European champion, climbed to third in the world rankings and is now the new Dutch number one. "2025 has been the best year of my career," he said. "The best year of my life so far."
His private life also played a part. “Bought a house with my girlfriend, moved in together, all in all it was a fantastic year.”
Looking ahead to 2026 and the Premier League
A new chapter awaits Van Veen in 2026. As world number three and Dutch number one, he will make his Premier League debut. “I’m looking forward to playing on Thursday nights for sixteen weeks,” he said. “And to all the World Series events.”
The Dutchman stressed he wants to enjoy every opportunity. “You never know if it’s the first or the last time, so I’m going to enjoy every minute.”
ADVERTISEMENT
At the same time, his approach remains unchanged. “For me the mindset doesn’t change,” he said. “I treat the World Series, Premier League, UK Open and European Tours the way I always have. As a chance to play well and go deep.”

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







