"That negativity... For two, three years, I was really in that downward spiral": Kim Huybrechts works on a comeback with help from a Belgian darts legend
PDC
After some turbulent years, Kim Huybrechts appears to be cautiously reconnecting with the upper-mid tier of international darts. The Belgian is enjoying a notable resurgence on the ProTour and suddenly finds himself back within reach of the major televised events. A scenario few would have considered at the start of this year.
ADVERTISEMENT
Huybrechts is all too aware of that. The former World Championship semi-finalist was trapped for a long time in a downward spiral where results, confidence, and enjoyment kept fading. Now, a few months on, there is renewed optimism from the Belgian, who openly admits that a major course correction was needed to revive his career. “Darts-wise, things are going pretty well for me,” Huybrechts says on the Darts Draait Door podcast. “We’re back in an upward, more enjoyable phase of my career that was really needed. And timing-wise I don’t think it could have been better.”
Those words would have been unthinkable a few months ago. During the last World Championship, Huybrechts hit rock bottom. His early exit delivered a harsh reality check. According to Vincent van der Voort, that’s when the realization hit that change was urgently required.
Read also
“That was an eye-opener for him as well,” says Van der Voort. “Something really has to change now, because if this keeps going, I’m going to lose my Tour Card according to you. And then, from realizing that to doing something about it and making it work, that’s really impressive.”
Breaking out of the negative spiral with a new plan
Huybrechts fully recognizes that feeling. The Belgian admits he spent years stuck in a pattern of negativity and doubt at the oche. “That negativity… For two, three years, I was really in that downward spiral,” he says. “You keep thinking: it’s against me again. Or that checkout is going in. And if they miss it once, you don’t capitalize. So it’s never fun or positive or good.”
Even wins hardly brought relief anymore. The belief was gone. “If you do win one, you think: I finally got a bit of luck, but soon it’ll be over again anyway.”
ADVERTISEMENT
To break that vicious cycle, Huybrechts decided to approach his career differently. The Belgian changed management and intensified his collaboration with former top darter Erik Clarys. The biggest shift came on the mental side.
“Erik really talks to me a lot,” Huybrechts explains. “Mainly addressing my weaknesses, in his view. We still do a lot of finishing work. And we’re also working very hard on the mental aspect.”

Kim Huybrechts has been working with Erik Clarys.
Where the cooperation used to be more sporadic, there is now a structured push for improvement. Multiple training sessions per week are designed to help Huybrechts find consistency again on the floor and on TV.
“It used to be much smaller in scale. We’d get together once a month. Now we do it two or three times a week and really dig into where it goes wrong, why it goes wrong, and how we can fix it.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Progress is also being made away from the dartboard. Huybrechts admits that physical readiness had been overlooked for years, something he increasingly notices during long tournament days. “We’re now working with dietitians and looking to hit the gym a bit,” he says with a laugh. “Is that fun? No.”
Fitness is playing a bigger role
Still, the Belgian realizes that physical condition is becoming ever more important at the highest level. Especially now that he’s going deeper in tournaments again. “When you barely win rounds for two or three years, you’re never in those tournaments for long, so you don’t consider how important that physical readiness is. But if you now go deeper, you notice that at a certain point you’re not just tired, but mainly mentally tired.”
Read also
Huybrechts believes that also explains why his level sometimes dips during longer events. “You’ll see matches where I average 98 or around a hundred, but by the third or fourth round it starts to drop. We’re addressing that now.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Van der Voort knows that situation all too well. He also went through spells where early exits became the norm and players fall out of rhythm physically and mentally. “At some point you’re so focused on that first round,” says Van der Voort. “As long as you win that first round, otherwise it was all for nothing. As a result, you’re no longer used to playing four or five matches in a day.”

It’s very possible we’ll see Kim Huybrechts at several majors in 2026
Huybrechts in the hunt for major appearances
Huybrechts’ recent results, however, show that the hard work is slowly paying off. The Belgian is suddenly back within touching distance of qualifying for major ranking events such as the World Matchplay and the World Grand Prix.
“Our first goal in January was to secure that Tour Card as quickly as possible,” says Huybrechts. “If you’re around 60th, everything depends on the Worlds and who picks up points there. But three months later you suddenly have a completely different mindset.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Where survival was the initial focus, ambitions have now shifted upwards again. “We’re still thinking about that Tour Card, but now you suddenly have other goals we didn’t expect this soon. Erik always says I’ve got an arm that shouldn’t be missing those tournaments. Matchplay, Grand Prix, I should be there every year.”
The analysts at the table agree it’s getting harder to break through on the ProTour. The Euro Tour system in particular helps established names remain protected for longer.
Huybrechts believes the current system offers little breathing space to players going through tough spells. “Over the years they’ve made the system a bit impossible for people in a difficult phase of their career, but also for new players,” he says. “The protection of the top players is part of that.”
According to the Belgian, the big televised tournaments have a huge impact on the rankings. “A Worlds or Grand Prix is so decisive in terms of prize money. You can perform almost all year, but if someone behind you wins three or four rounds at a Worlds, you’ve fought all year for nothing.”

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







