"If you can't serve the demand, the demand goes somewhere else": Barry Hearn teases potential future away from Ally Pally for PDC World Darts Championship
PDC
In more than half a century of sports promotion, Barry Hearn has seen a lot, but nothing - really nothing - he says comes close to what is happening with darts. The Matchroom president and architect of the modern PDC era sat down with talkSPORT and talked about how the sport is breaking every imaginable boundary.
ADVERTISEMENT
"In 51 years, I have never seen anything like it."
Hearn does not have to think long when asked if he has ever experienced such explosive growth before. "In 51 years of promoting sport, I've never seen anything like this. And I'm not just talking about the United Kingdom - darts is growing worldwide," he says.
According to Hearn, darts' success almost makes sense if you understand how sports work. It's about accessibility. "Just like football is great because all you need is a ball, for darts you need a board and three darts. No club dues, no expensive facilities. Hang it up in your bedroom and you can start."
That approachability creates new recruits worldwide. Sometimes from corners that even Hearn doesn't see coming. "There's a new kid from Mongolia now, 14 or 15 years old, absolutely sensational," he says visibly enthusiastic. "We are all impressed with Luke Littler, but believe me: there are more to come."
Read also
From China to Australia: dartboards hang everywhere
Those who think darts is only popular in Europe and the United Kingdom get an instant reality check from Hearn. "We have Premier League Darts in China, for the Chinese. We just finished Premier League Darts Australia," Hearn says, and in countries like Malaysia, Hong Kong and Thailand, he sees an explosion of dart courts and local leagues. The popularity is so great that Matchroom is now fully committed to the next step: a massive breakthrough in the United States.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Next year we are launching something big in the USA. Darts and pool. A new office in New York. Time to show Americans how to really promote sports," it sounds with a wink, but above all with serious ambition.
With global growth also comes a sporting effect. Competition has become cutthroat. Hearn cites an example that many darts fans will recognise: "Eric Bristow won the World Championship, what will it be, 106 years ago?" he jokes. "His average was somewhere high in the 80s. Today? If you don't throw 110, you have zero chance."
Read also
And it goes even further. "I see 10-year-olds throwing 100+ average. 11- and 12-year-olds throwing nine-starters. Of course they are still fully developed, but what a level to start with! And they know they can make a living at it."
According to Hearn, that is exactly what makes the sport so special: its egalitarian nature. "Darts is a completely level playing field. It doesn't matter who your father is, how much money you have. All that matters is your average and whether you can throw."
ADVERTISEMENT
Ally Pally is bursting at the seams
Finally, the conversation turns to the PDC World Darts Championship at Alexandra Palace - the annual darts festival that draws massive crowds. Hearn is pleased, but also sees a clear problem: The stretch is out. "I sold 125,000 tickets in 10 minutes. The demand is almost comparable to Glastonbury. That says it all," he says.
But that success also creates challenges: "I don't want people to say they spent five years trying to get tickets and never got in. If you can't serve the demand, the demand goes somewhere else."
Therefore, the PDC is exploring alternatives within the same complex. "There is a bigger venue at Ally Pally. We might go there. Then you're talking about thousands of extra seats per day." The charm of the World Championship must be preserved, Hearn emphasises, but he also knows that the days of thinking small are over. "We have to move with the public. The sport is growing ... and we are growing with it."
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026










