"There isn't room for a lot more": Rising demand provides luxury problem for PDC amid Luke Littler effect
PDC
As Chief Executive of the Professional Darts Corporation, Matt Porter has overseen a period of enormous growth for the sport. With record crowds, global expansion, and the World Championship at Alexandra Palace selling out faster than ever before, Porter believes darts is operating at full throttle — and he wouldn’t have it any other way.
ADVERTISEMENT
“We’ve spent a lot of effort, money, time, and blood, sweat and tears over the last two decades building our calendar,” Porter explained to Online Darts. “Building it to a point where it’s recognisable, where events are identifiable with cities or times of the year. I think we’re at that point now. We’re right on capacity where we are now.”
Despite huge demand, Porter is cautious about oversaturating the schedule. “I don’t think putting another five, six, seven events in is going to increase the demand. I think it’s just going to shift the demand from one area to another,” he said. “I wouldn’t say we’re at breaking point, but there isn’t room for a lot more.”
One of the biggest talking points is the future of the World Series of Darts. Expansion is very much on the agenda, with conversations taking place across the globe. “I think there’ll be at least one new country in 2026,” Porter revealed. “We’ve got ongoing conversations with places in North America, Southeast Asia, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, the Far East — you name it. Everywhere’s interested. But these conversations take a long time. You’ve got to get the venue, the timing, the local interest, and the broadcast sorted. We’ll get there.”
The Netherlands remains uncertain, however, with the Dutch Darts Masters under review following restrictions on betting sponsorship. “We haven’t crossed it off, but it’s obviously an event where its future is under review,” he admitted.
Read also
Elsewhere, the World Series is booming. “The big pluses for me this year were: Bahrain, crowd numbers up. Copenhagen, crowd numbers up. Australia and New Zealand in particular, hugely up. New York, hugely up. The Dutch event sold out — it was a small venue, but it sold out. The Polish event stayed at the same level, but that was fine, because it was a good level,” Porter said.
For him, the real success is seeing new audiences converted into fans and players. “We’re definitely seeing people in those countries coming to events because they know it’s in their town, not necessarily because they’re darts people who follow it year-round. The data shows we’re getting repeat buyers, we’re getting people from out of town. It’s a real positive because it’s a conversion process: from someone being interested in darts, to buying a ticket, to rebooking, and then playing.”
ADVERTISEMENT
In North America, the Madison Square Garden setting has given darts a foothold in one of sport’s biggest markets. “New York’s a glamour city, isn’t it? America’s a big market. Being at Madison Square Garden puts you on a different level. That’s probably why it gets so much attention,” Porter said.
Read also
Down under, the PDC has also been working to rebuild the domestic scene. “At the moment, it’s about trying to get domestic darts in Australia back to the level it was maybe a decade ago,” he said. “An opportunity presented itself with a promoter down there for the Australian and New Zealand Premier League. Now there’s a new opportunity for domestic players. We know there’s a talent pool, we know there’s an appetite to commit — Whitlock, Anderson, Blessing, Heta, even Cadby for a short period. They’ve all shown that appetite. It’s just about harnessing it and presenting opportunities.”
That commitment was underlined by the creation of the Kyle Anderson Trophy. “He was such a great guy,” Porter said warmly. “There wasn’t a person in darts who didn’t like Kyle Anderson and he’s still missed. It’s important for us to keep his flame burning when we go down there.”
Future of Ally Pally
ADVERTISEMENT
Back in the UK, demand for the World Darts Championship continues to outstrip supply. Even after four extra days and eight extra sessions were added, tickets sold out in record time. “It flew out, which was great. It shows people love visiting Ally Pally at Christmas,” Porter said. “The demand is insatiable — from fans, media, broadcasters, not just here but around the world. We’ve got to do everything we can to maximise the event.”
The future of the tournament venue has been widely discussed, but Porter insists the special atmosphere must be preserved. “There’s that ‘X factor’ of the ticket. You don’t want them to be too easy to get,” he explained. “We think we’re fair with ticket prices. People criticise us for a lot of things, but not many say, ‘Your tickets are a rip-off.’ Our fans are great and loyal to us, and we want to be loyal back.” While London would remain the priority, Porter admits the PDC will always consider options if expansion is needed.
Looking ahead, the World Championship is set to welcome 128 players, while prize money continues to rise thanks to a new Sky Sports deal. “This is the start of a really exciting time for us all,” Porter said. “With prize money going up, the calendar in place, new countries on the horizon — it’s a cliché, but there’s never been a better time for darts or to be a dart player. Bring it on.”
In the US, a new broadcasting arrangement has already shown promise. “We did see a big uptake when we moved to Peacock,” he confirmed. “The advantage we’ll have is that they show Premier League football, which helps bring new viewers across.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






