"There wouldn’t be any more than that. No” - Matt Porter rules out bringing PDC majors to Saudi Arabia after successful World Series debut
PDCLast month, the Saudi Arabia Darts Masters was played for the first time in history. A milestone for the sport, once again showing how far professional darts has grown in recent years.
ADVERTISEMENT
Still, the tournament in Riyadh was anything but a standard event. The atmosphere, the setting, and the crowd differed greatly from what players and fans are used to at, for example, the Premier League Darts or the big Euro Tour events.
According to Matt Porter, CEO of the PDC, the tournament was above all a valuable learning experience. “It was obviously an interesting, interesting place to do an event for the first time,” Porter told Metro. “Different to our other events, the crowd was obviously a little bit more restrained, but nevertheless, they enjoyed it. There was a lot of local interest. We were very well looked after. It went as well as we’d have hoped.”
The Saudi Arabia Darts Masters was part of the World Series of Darts and was played in a region where darts is still very much developing. You could sense that not only in the atmosphere in the stands, but also in the way players had to adapt to the conditions.
Read also
Players had to adjust
Porter emphasizes that not every player handled that new environment the same way. “Each of the players would have taken to it differently. They knew what to expect. And obviously they get the chance to go out and play on the stage before the crowd come in so they could see the size of the arenas, perhaps not as big as they’d been used to in other events.”
The venues were smaller than at some major PDC events in Europe or the United Kingdom, but that didn’t pose a problem, according to Porter. “They’re playing exhibitions in those sort of size arenas and they’re perfectly capable of adapting. Some can adapt more easily than others.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Still, the success of this debut inevitably raises the question: will we see more darts in Saudi Arabia in the future? Porter remains notably level-headed. “I think one event in any sort of developing country is right. So no, there wouldn’t be any more than that. No.”
Big ambitions for prize money
That stands in sharp contrast to the words of Matchroom president Barry Hearn, who dares to dream big when it comes to the sport’s financial future. Speaking to The Sun, Hearn made it clear the bar is far from reached. “I look at darts now and I think, OK, we’ve done well — £25million prize money, £1m for the winner,” said Hearn. “So the next target is to get to £100m prize money with £5m to the winner.”
Porter responds with nuance but ambition. “I think the key thing is that you never rule anything out. Who’d have thought 10 years ago we’d be paying £1m to the winner of the World Championship?”
According to the PDC chief, growth is a gradual process. “As the sport keeps growing, then we’ll keep delivering across not just the world championship, but every other event. We’ve raised prize money across the board for this year. £25,000,000 in total. One day it’d be great to get it to 50 million, 75 million, 100 million. All we can do is just keep growing it and the market will react and tell us to the level that we can get to.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Young talent is flooding the sport
One of the key pillars of that growth is the huge influx of young talent. Porter even calls it a “scary” development. “The talent base is frightening. The number of teenagers who are throwing 100 averages, 9 dart finishes is remarkable.”
According to Porter, darts has clearly become a young players’ sport. “And it’s definitely a young person’s sport now and I think you’ll see that with the emergence of more talent from the JDC and the Development Tour over the coming years.”
To monitor that development, the PDC keeps detailed statistics. “We have a fascinating spreadsheet, which I enjoy looking at every year, which shows the average age of our players, not only our tour card holders, but then our top 8 top 16, top 32, top 64, etcc. And it just drops every year.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The reason is simple, he says. “It’s a sport that young people are coming into because there’s a genuine career path and it’s a sport that they, you know, they can get into from any background, wherever they’re from. There’s very few barriers to entry and that means that natural talent is really the only, only denominator.”

Matt Porter at the Alexandra Palace
25 years of growth without standing still
Porter has now worked for Barry Hearn and Matchroom for 25 years. There’s rarely time to look back extensively, he admits. “Every day is a different challenge," he said. "We’ve grown so much and so organically, you kind of take it in your stride, but the schedule is so relentless that there isn’t really always time to sit back and reflect.”
Still, he can’t deny the huge development. “It’s been an amazing journey. This is my 25th year working for Barry and if I look at where we are now as a company compared to where we were in 2001, it’s a remarkable transformation.”
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Porter, the success is mainly thanks to the players and the events themselves. “I think it’s testimony to the events and the players who played in them, that they’ve been so popular with fans and that’s enabled us to get to this stage.”
He emphasizes there hasn’t been any radical reinvention. “We haven’t reinvented the wheel, we’ve just delivered products that the people want to engage with and enjoy. And at the moment, that’s going really well.”
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026





