"There’s a little bit of me that was hoping it was going to go to sudden death": Connor Scutt craved late drama in Whitlock win
PDC
Connor Scutt admitted he secretly hoped his opening-round match at the 2026 PDC World Darts Championship would go the distance, after edging past Simon Whitlock in a dramatic and testing encounter that showcased both his composure and growing resilience on the big stage.
ADVERTISEMENT
Fresh from seeing off the Australian legend at Ally Pally, Scutt reflected on a contest that swung back and forth after he had raced into an early 2–0 lead.
“Do you know what, there’s a little bit of me that was hoping it was going to go to sudden death, like two legs all, two sets all,” Scutt said. “It would have been nice to have been involved in one of those sorts of things, because I enjoy watching them. I’m very much a fan of darts at the end of the day, so I don’t mind being up there and playing in front of everyone.”
Despite Whitlock enjoying strong crowd support, Scutt insisted it never affected him mentally. “The chances for Simon didn’t get to me or anything,” he explained. “I was hoping it was going to be a longer game than what it was. I was surprised I went 2–0 up, to be fair, because Simon looked so up for it.”
Sharpness of Whitlock and momentum shift
Scutt was particularly struck by Whitlock’s sharpness before a dart had even been thrown. “For the nearest bull, on the nine practice darts, I think he went eight out of nine bull-wise. Luckily enough, I won the bull, but it’s one of those. I’m very happy to get through it.”
After missing match darts and allowing Whitlock back into the contest, Scutt acknowledged that the momentum shifted, even if he felt his own performance remained solid. “I think I was steady towards the end,” he said. “I wasn’t amazing, but I was very, very steady. Simon was a lot better than I was with his 180s and the big trebles he was hitting. He was better than I was towards the end, but I’m very happy to get through it.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Importantly for Scutt, the win proved something to himself. “I showed a bit more of my fighting quality,” he said. “A lot of the games you see me win on TV are by a large margin. Other than the game I had against Gerwyn Price this year at the UK Open, most of the games I’ve won on TV have been by two, three or four legs. So it’s nice to know that I can battle it out on TV.”
The victory sets up a mouth-watering second-round clash with two-time world champion Gary Anderson, another figure Scutt knows well. “It’s really funny – I used Simon’s darts to get my tour card,” he revealed. “Me and Simon got on extremely well. We used to play each other locally and I’ve played him loads of times on the ProTour.
“Me and Gary also know each other very well and have played each other loads of times on the ProTour. It’s very similar, other than the fact that Gary’s won this twice. But I look forward to it. It’s nice playing someone that I know very well. It should be a great game.”
Nervy moments and self reflection
Scutt also addressed the nervy moments late on, including a flurry of missed match darts that nearly proved costly. “If I’m completely honest, I didn’t realise I’d missed so many match darts,” he admitted. “When you’re playing someone like Simon and the crowd are on his side a lot, you kind of zone out.
ADVERTISEMENT
“You go one of two ways: you either think, ‘Oh no, the world’s against me,’ or you just zone out a little bit. I didn’t realise I’d missed so many match darts. I wasn’t aware. I would have very much liked the nine-darter in that last leg though – that would have been nice.”
Looking ahead to facing Anderson, Scutt believes his mindset is one of his biggest strengths. “I think I’m very lucky with my attitude towards the game,” he said. “I take every opponent the same. If they have a tour card and play professional darts, I treat everyone the same.
“There’s no reason why the number 128 tour card holder in the world won’t play as well as Simon did today. Everyone is capable of it in this system. I respect everybody and treat everyone like they’re at the top of the sport.”
The win also capped off a period of reflection for Scutt, who admitted he had been overly critical of his own season. “After the Grand Slam, I did a lot of reflecting,” he said. “The season wasn’t that bad. I didn’t qualify for the Players Championship Finals, but standard-wise there are a lot of players in that Finals who would have been happy to play how I played all year.
“I averaged around 93, nearly 94, for the year, which is a very good standard by anyone’s measurements. I feel like I’ve performed well – the results just haven’t gone my way. I’ve got to start trying to make the results go my way.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Scutt was candid about being his own harshest judge. “Oh, 100%. I’m my own worst critic,” he said. “That’s why I practise so hard and for so long. A lot of people know I practise seven or eight hours a day. I’ve cut it down recently to make sure I’m fresh, especially if it goes long format.
“I know what I have in the locker and what I don’t. I know when I haven’t prepared properly. This season I tried my best and it just didn’t go my way in some games. You’ve got to accept that and move on.”
Next up: his hero Gary Anderson
Asked about managing nerves and aggression on stage, Scutt suggested it is something he keeps in reserve. “If you look at the last leg I won, I think I was a lot more aggressive,” he said. “I hit back-to-back 180s with my first six darts, and that helped me get over the line.
ADVERTISEMENT
“It was more about learning to deal with a crowd that was slightly against me. I haven’t had much experience playing in front of a few thousand people against someone as popular as Simon Whitlock. It stands me in good stead – it’s great experience for me.”
For now, that experience will be invaluable as he prepares to take on one of his heroes. “Gary is my hero,” Scutt said. “I used Gary Anderson darts years ago when I was coming through county youth darts. He’s the most famous number in my phone contacts.
“I get on with Gary extremely well and we have the utmost respect for each other. I just hope we both have a great game. It would be nice.”
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026