“Think the most anonymous number one in the world”: Luke Humphries labelled as unremarkable front runner amid Littler presence
PDCLast weekend was all about the Czech Darts Open, where Luke Humphries once again showed why he leads the world rankings. Despite inconsistent play, the Englishman won the title by beating Josh Rock in the final. The Dutch talents also showed their skills: Gian van Veen and Wessel Nijman continue to impress, while Michael van Gerwen is struggling to find his old level again.
ADVERTISEMENT
Vincent van der Voort praised 'Cool Hand Luke's' victory in the podcast Darts Draait Door: "What I thought was great about this victory is that he didn't play very well at all... but did the right things at the right moments. Then you see why he is number one in the world."
Humphries: the 'anonymous No. 1'
Humphries' status as world number one remains fodder for debate. According to Van der Voort, he may be the most unremarkable front-runner ever: "I think the most anonymous number one in the world. It reminds me of the time when Colin Lloyd was on top, but everyone knew that Taylor was actually the best. With Humphries now, it's often about Littler. The hype revolves around him, and therefore it is almost forgotten that Humphries is the real number one."
That picture underscores how much the darts world has changed in recent years. Whereas Michael van Gerwen was the best for years without question, Humphries has to prove his status over and over again in the shadow of the youngest superstar, Luke Littler. Still, Humphries managed to win the final in Prague against Rock, after previously crawling through the eye of the needle against Wessel Nijman.
Read also
"Nijman could have just won that match," Van der Voort said. "He missed match darts, and that's sour. But then when you push through and still win it over, you show that you're made of the right stuff."
Josh Rock's final appearance confirms his rise. Two Euro Tour finals in a row, though both were lost, show that the Northern Irishman is ready for to take his first major majors title. "He just presents himself for a spot in the Premier League next year," Van der Voort stated firmly.
ADVERTISEMENT
Yet it is not only Rock and Littler who are coloring the future. Dutch talents Nijman and Van Veen continue to develop. Van Veen even made it to the semifinals this weekend, knocking off none other than Gerwyn Price 6-0 along the way.
"Price threw an average of 104, and yet he got a hand. Van Veen missed nothing. Every finish he got was out. That's impressive, and shows how fast he's maturing as a player," Van der Voort said. His co-host Damian Vlottes added: "It's really enjoyable with that young guard: Humphries, Rock, Littler, Van Veen, Nijman ... a new generation that's going to color darts in the years to come."
Michael van Gerwen shows flashes of old level but lacks consistency
For Van Gerwen, however, it remains puzzling. The Dutchman started his tournament excellently with a convincing 6-0 victory over Mike De Decker. His average of over 112 gave the impression that the old Van Gerwen was back. Yet that idea quickly disappeared: in the next round, he did not get beyond an average of 89 and had to acknowledge his superiority to Rock.
"One game he can still throw fantastic. But after that it drops back to 90 average. That's just down 23 points," Van der Voort analyzed. "He can still charge for a pot, but he can't manage to hold that for an entire tournament."
ADVERTISEMENT
What he says is particularly striking is the difference in appearance. "He used to go on stage to wreck someone. He wanted to show the audience how many times he could throw 170 and 9-darters. Now it's all business and hard work. The eagerness and energy seem to have diminished."
Vlottes wondered how Van Gerwen can turn this around. Van der Voort replied, "It's mainly mental. If you are not in shape, it is difficult. But here you see it's still there. He has to find that hunger again: the idea that only winning counts. He has to get back to that."
A notable match in the tournament was that between Luke Littler and Gian van Veen. Littler lost again, so the balance in mutual encounters is now 3-1 in favor of Van Veen. Van der Voort explained that this is partly due to their common background: "The three of them - Littler, Nijman and Van Veen - dominated the Development Tour. Against contemporaries of their generation it is always more difficult. You also saw that with Nijman, who often won from Littler. That mental component plays a role."
It is telling that despite his impressive winning streak at the senior level, Littler struggles against peers who know him better. "When someone catches you five, six times in a row, you go into a match differently," Van der Voort said.
The growth of Nijman and Van Veen
ADVERTISEMENT
Especially Nijman and Van Veen are making great strides. Nijman showed against Humphries that he can compete on the highest stage, although he failed to finish it off. Van der Voort nevertheless sees a lot of potential: "Every arrow is tightly grouped around the triple. He just plays well. If you do get that match, you can reach the final. But you don't get chances like that every week. It's a shame, but also a sign that he's coming."
Van Veen, according to him, shows above all that he is getting stronger mentally: "Last year, if he started badly, it was finished. Now he can turn that around in a match. That makes him much harder to beat. He's getting better every year."
The discussion is slowly shifting to the question of who are the best Dutchmen right now. Vlottes put that question to Van der Voort: are they Van Gerwen and Noppert, or the young guard after all? Van der Voort was clear: "At this moment Nijman and Van Veen are the best two Dutchmen. With Noppert and Van Duivenbode right behind them. But in terms of impression, in terms of development: those two stand out right now."
This is a remarkable observation, given Van Gerwen's hegemony of many years. It underscores the change going on within the Dutch darts world.
Finally, the structure of the Euro Tour was also discussed. Players like Van Veen have an extra hard time because they often have to start in the first round, while established names enjoy protection.
ADVERTISEMENT
"The system protects the top," Van der Voort explained. "You actually have to get into the top 16 in the world to be a real fixture. Otherwise, you have to start in the first round every time, and that makes it much tougher."
Vlottes pointed out that last year the Pro Tour ranking determined placement, something he said seemed fairer. But in the end, both acknowledged, it comes down to the interests of Premier League players. "It's set up so Premier League players don't have to play on Fridays. It just comes down to that," Van der Voort concluded.
Read also

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







