"Well, I was comfy on the couch, my eyes closed for a moment": Vincent van der Voort nodded off watching King v White Ally Pally clash
PDCIn the latest episode of Darts Draait Door, Damien Vlottes and Vincent van der Voort once again weighed in on Friday’s matches at the World Darts Championship. From the wins by Gian van Veen and Niels Zonneveld to the veterans’ clash between Ian White and Mervyn King, everything was covered.
ADVERTISEMENT
When Vlottes asks who they want to start with, Van der Voort doesn’t need long to decide. “Zonneveld,” he says firmly. And that’s no surprise, as he played the first match of the afternoon session against Haupai Puha. “Great win. The first two sets were quite close of course, but when he had to deliver, he did. Twice a fifth leg where he threw a strong leg.” And in the third set everything clicked. “In the third set he was really free-flowing. Then you see how good he can be,” said Van der Voort.
However, he does notice a recurring pattern with several players on the Worlds stage. “You do notice those breaks play a part, that before them it’s a bit of a warm-up in those matches. And with him you really saw after that second break that he was off the leash.” What stood out most was Zonneveld delivering at the key moments. “You see in those first few legs there’s still some tension, but when it really mattered, the fifth leg of the first set, the fifth leg of the second set, he threw just fine. Just really good legs.”
Read also
Ian White vs. Mervyn King: nodding off on the couch
The second match of the afternoon was between veterans Mervyn King and Ian White, a tie where Van der Voort struggled to stay sharp. “Well, I was comfy on the couch. My eyes closed for a moment. A set and a half later I thought: hey, I missed a bit. They were still at it, so I did see the last set.”
He mainly sees the physical battle for King. “You see Mervyn… Mervyn is no longer the fittest. Sighing, groaning. But he gave it everything, one hundred percent. He kept fighting. The man is 58, 59. It’s not that strange. And of course he’s carrying a bit of extra weight. We should be honest about that. I’m overweight too, but luckily I don’t have to do it anymore,” he says with a laugh.
The question then follows whether he still has a chance to win back his Tour Card via Q-School. “Well, if you can make it here, then he can survive Q-School too. Definitely. The only thing is: does he still want to go to all those tournaments?” Van der Voort openly wonders.
ADVERTISEMENT
Rob Cross wins with ease: “More than enough”
The reward for Ian White? A match against Rob Cross in the next round, as he beat a below-par Cor Dekker. “That went nowhere,” Van der Voort concluded of Dekker’s performance. “At one point he missed six or seven darts at double. You think, it’s only one leg. But that’s the moment that keeps him from getting into the match.”
“And what did you make of Cross? He averaged 91,” asked Vlottes. “It wasn’t bad. It wasn’t great either. If your opponent averages 82, it’s more than enough. He was never in trouble.” He also wrapped up the match with a flourish. “A nice 170 checkout. He had some energy about him and you saw him celebrate a bit at times. There’s always pressure and you’re relieved when the doubles go in.”
But who is the favorite in the next round? Cross or White? “Ian White is a dangerous player,” said Van der Voort. “Cross is the clear favorite… but whether it will be straightforward depends entirely on Cross himself.”
Landman fails to impress and loses Tour Card
ADVERTISEMENT
The last match of the afternoon was between Ryan Searle and Dutchman Chris Landman, who never really got into the game. “From what I saw, Landman wasn’t in top form. I believe in the third set he missed two darts at double twice. Those have to go in and it didn’t happen,” concluded Van der Voort.
This means he has now lost his Tour Card. “Odd, isn’t it?” says Vlottes. “Two consecutive World Championship qualifications. In the past that was enough to keep your Tour Card. That didn’t work this time.” Van der Voort then wonders if that’s really so bad. “You do hear more and more people saying they’d rather not have a Tour Card. Then they can play everything. If you’re a bit stuck in between.”
Van der Voort doesn’t know whether Landman will go back to Q-School in January to win it back. “I don’t know how he feels about it. I don’t know him well enough for that. But he’ll probably just go to Q-School.”
Evans vs Lok Leung: a match at a brisk pace
The evening session appealed to both men much more. “That was better than the afternoon session,” said Vlottes. Van der Voort immediately mentions a name that stood out. “I thought Ricky Evans made a very strong impression.” He played Man Lok Leung from Hong Kong, which was no easy draw. “He’s a very good player.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The latter earns praise from Van der Voort, but also a tip. “I thought he was a bit too quick at times. Which meant he went along with Ricky Evans’ rhythm.” And that’s exactly how Evans can disrupt his opponents. The Dutchman does hope Lok Leung considers Q-School in January. “Hopefully he goes to Q-School at some point. That would be great… because he’s a terrific player.
The question, however, is whether this is feasible. “That’s really a financial equation for those lads. You can’t think from Asia: I’ll head over, and if I get through Q-School, we’ll see. You can’t keep flying back and forth. That costs far too much money.”
Another evening match that stuck was the one between the Swede Andreas Harrysson and Ross Smith. ‘Smudger’ played well but missed at the key moments. “Another crap Worlds for Ross… He was good, but he misses six, seven match darts or so. He’ll be absolutely gutted.” Harrysson also earns praise. “He’s simply a good darter, of course. He’s making his debut. It was nice to see him here for the first time. And he delivered, too.”
Match of the day: Van Veen versus Reyes
And then the highlight of Friday: the clash between European Championship winner Gian van Veen and Spain’s Cristo Reyes. “It was a cracking match, wasn’t it? For the first round. Possibly the best match of the first round,” said Van der Voort. The high standard stood out to him. “I thought the level was really good. I thought Reyes was throwing nice and tight as well. Sure, you can see he’s missing a bit of competition at that level. But when you hear he’s going to Q-School… then I think there’s still a lot of good stuff in him.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Despite the fact Van Veen was never truly in trouble, there was one moment when the match could have turned. “He gets hit with that 167 and then loses the third set. After that it got a little nervy for a moment. Reyes misses that 158 for 2-2 in sets. Otherwise I’d have had to see it. Because then you really start to worry.”
That’s exactly why Van der Voort calls it an excellent win for his compatriot. “He also didn’t have much luck with the draw again. He gets someone throwing a 96 average against you. Many other players would have lost to Reyes,” he believes. In the past, Van Veen could lose when someone played well against him, but perhaps his recent European title was a turning point. “That was a bit the case before. That he often ran into players who played well, and then he couldn’t quite win. And now he had absolutely no problem with that.”
Van der Voort does think, however, that he shouldn’t get overly euphoric straight away. “You also have to make sure you’re not too euphoric. Because it’s still only the first round.” He links this to the expectations around the young Dutchman. “He’s seeded 10, so he should reach the last 16. At minimum.” With the bookmakers, Van Veen is one of the favorites for the title, behind names like Luke Littler and Luke Humphries. According to Van der Voort, he ‘lived up to’ that status on Friday night. “I thought he and Littler have been the ones to impress the most so far,” he concluded positively.
Read also

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







