"I went, ‘Oh no.’ You don’t want to play the woman": Dave Chisnall on drawing Fallon Sherrock and issues with his throw
PDCDave Chisnall left the Alexandra Palace stage relieved, reflective and quietly optimistic after booking his place in the second round of the 2026 World Darts Championship, overcoming Fallon Sherrock in a match that tested both his game and his mindset.
ADVERTISEMENT
After a difficult year by his own admission, the former world number three was quick to acknowledge the significance of simply getting through, even if the performance itself was not one he was entirely satisfied with.
“I’m buzzing, to be fair,” Chisnall said afterwards. “Everybody knows it’s been a bad year for me, but you know what? I said to Fallon, if you hit your doubles there, it could have been a lot tighter. I don’t know if I would have picked up more, you don’t know that, but if she could have won the first set 3–1, she missed doubles, then she missed the 1–5–8. But yeah, I’m pleased, and I can only get better.”
One of the key positives for Chisnall was his finishing, an area of his game that has often been questioned throughout his career. Against Sherrock, he converted 47 per cent of his attempts on the outer ring.
“Forty-seven per cent on the doubles is a really strong showing on the outer ring,” he said. “If I get my scoring well and it forces me to focus on doubles, I’ve got a great chance, don’t I? Because over the years, people say I’m rubbish at doubles, but it showed there, it was quite good.”
Read also
No expectations after slump and throw issue
The win sets up a second-round meeting with Ricardo Pietreczko, but Chisnall knows he will need to raise his level. “Everybody knows Ricardo’s a good player. So am I,” he said. “But I won’t go up there playing like that. I think it’s Saturday. It’ll be a different me.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Chisnall arrived at this year’s World Championship with little external expectation, having endured a prolonged slump in form that has seen him slide down the rankings. “There’s no expectations,” he explained. “I’ll just go and play my game. And if I can do that, I’ll go a long way. But I have been struggling for the last nine or ten months, and I don’t know why I started struggling. If I get that throw right, I’ve got a sweat on. If I get that right, I will be hard to beat.”
Much of Chisnall’s frustration centres around technical inconsistencies in his throw, something he is acutely aware of but has found difficult to correct. “When I’m throwing, I’m pulling it back past me sometimes, not all the time,” he said. “And when I’m throwing straight on, I’m not rushing the throw. For some reason, I’m just going… and they go everywhere.”
That awareness only adds to the frustration. “It’s very frustrating,” he admitted. “The more you try to stop it, the worse it gets. But it’s not the whole game, it’s only part of it. I’m just going to try and keep focused and keep it where I want my throw to be.”
Despite the struggles, Chisnall insists the hunger to compete and win remains undiminished. “The hunger is there. I want to play,” he said. “I’ve been here 15, 16 years. I’ve been through a bad spell before and I’ve come through it. I’m not a quitter, so I’ll just keep going.”
ADVERTISEMENT
His confidence, however, is something he describes as fragile and situational. “I have, and I haven’t,” he said when asked if he still believes in his game. “When I practise, it’s good. When I come here, I think it’s the nerves that makes you do that. But I don’t feel nervous up there. Even when she was missing doubles, I was just trying to cheer myself up. It wasn’t working. I was just trying to let it travel. When I got a double, I was quite good at it.”
No interest in technical help
Unlike some players, Chisnall has no interest in seeking external technical help. “It doesn’t interest me,” he said. “I’m just my own person. If it’s not happening, it’s not happening. I know I’ll get it back. I’ve got 100 per cent belief in me on the floor. It’s just a blip.”
When reflecting on the most difficult periods of his career, Chisnall was candid and emotional, placing his current struggles into perspective.
“It’s one of the hardest,” he said. “I had a hard time when my mum passed away. That would probably be the hardest, really, because obviously I lost my mum. But I got over that. My family kept saying, stop thinking about your mum, and that went on for six or seven months. I don’t even know what this time is. I don’t know why I’m doing this. It’s just happening. I’ve just got to battle through.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The draw against Sherrock brought its own challenges, particularly with the unique atmosphere that often accompanies her matches at Ally Pally. “I didn’t see the draw,” Chisnall said. “One of my mates messaged me saying, ‘You’re playing Fallon,’ and I went, ‘Oh no.’ You don’t want to play the woman, because you don’t know what the crowd will be like. They love the underdog. Is that the word for Fallon? Because she’s a good player. They just want her to do well.”
Dave Chisnall has had mooted struggles this year.
In contrast to some previous experiences, the crowd response was something Chisnall welcomed. “The crowd was absolutely insane. No booing, no whistling, no nothing. Just respect to both of us. I like that,” he said. “I think we both got total respect up there. It felt like a flowing game. We were hitting some good scores, missing doubles, then nicking legs on doubles.”
There was also an unusual moment during the match, when Chisnall later discovered he had been sharing the stage with two wasps. “One of the security guys flicked one off my neck, then there was one on my arm and he flicked that one off as well,” he revealed. “No, it wouldn’t have made a difference if I’d known.”
Chisnall’s visible frustration on stage was not directed at his opponent, but at his own standards. “I was disappointed in my game,” he said. “I’m a lot better than that. I’ve got to be a lot better if I want to beat Big T.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Preparation for this year’s tournament has been more intense than usual, even if the issues persist. “I’ve practised a lot this month, more than I normally do,” he said. “I’ve had a few of my mates round to help me practise. In practice, it’s not there, that follow-through. It’s only when I play on the big stage. It’s hardly there on the Pro Tours. It’s just when I play up there.”
Ultimately, Chisnall drew a clear distinction between performance and result. “I’m proud of winning,” he said. “The second set was a great set. The third one was a bit more nervous, Fallon got into the game more and she could have taken it. I’m not proud of my performance, but I’m proud of the win.”
With fellow North West players such as Luke Littler, Michael Smith and Stephen Bunting flourishing, Chisnall remains unconcerned by his own drop from third to 21st in the rankings. “I don’t look at rankings,” he said. “That’s darts, isn’t it? You have a good run, that’s why you’re up there. You have a bad run, that’s why the money comes off. That’s just how it is.”

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026





