Who’s hit the most 100+ averages on TV in the last decade? From Michael van Gerwen to Luke Littler and even Phil Taylor
PDC
Over the past decade, televised darts has reached unprecedented heights — and one key metric tells much of the story: the 100+ average. Once a rarity reserved for the sport’s elite moments, three-figure averages are now almost a benchmark for top-level performance.
ADVERTISEMENT
Thanks to detailed data from Darts Orakel, we can now look back and rank the players who have delivered the most televised 100+ averages in the last ten years. The list offers a telling snapshot of an era — one where a new generation emerged while legends cemented their legacies.
Read also
Michael van Gerwen: In a League of His Own
Top of the pile — by a staggering margin — is Michael van Gerwen. The Dutchman has produced a televised average of 100 or more an extraordinary 371 times over the last decade. That’s more than double the total of the next-best player, and a resounding testament to his unmatched consistency and dominance during his prime years.
Van Gerwen’s explosive scoring and relentless pace set new standards for what a complete modern player looks like. While others have challenged, none have sustained such a level across so many matches, so often under pressure. This statistic simply reinforces what most darts fans already know: MVG has been the defining player of the past ten years.
Peter Wright, Gary Anderson, and Gerwyn Price: The Established Order
ADVERTISEMENT
Next on the list is two-time world champion Peter Wright, with 164 televised 100+ averages. The colourful Scot has remained a fixture at the business end of major tournaments throughout the past decade, claiming eight major titles between 2017 and 2023. Known for his meticulous preparation and ever-changing equipment setup, Wright has combined flair with steady consistency — and the numbers prove it.
Joint third are Gary Anderson and Gerwyn Price, both with 143 appearances above the century mark. Anderson’s inclusion comes as no surprise. A back-to-back world champion and one of the game’s smoothest scorers, “The Flying Scotsman” has long been a force in TV events, particularly during his peak between 2014 and 2018.
Price, meanwhile, has ascended the ranks more recently, relying on explosive power scoring and elite-level finishing to become one of the sport’s most feared competitors. Though he’s spent fewer years at the summit than his Scottish rival, his consistency in the last five years has put him firmly among the modern elite.
Read also
Michael Smith and Luke Littler: The New Guard Has Arrived
ADVERTISEMENT
Fifth on the list is 2023 world champion Michael Smith, with 108 televised 100+ averages. “Bully Boy” enjoyed a golden spell from 2019 to 2023, marked by his blistering 180-hitting and a newfound ability to close out major titles. His high-scoring style naturally lends itself to big averages, and this tally reflects his evolution into a proven winner on the big stage.
Then comes the most eye-catching name on the list: Luke Littler, with 104. That’s right — the teenager who only made his major breakthrough at the 2023 World Championship is already rubbing shoulders with the sport’s most consistent scorers. Littler’s meteoric rise has been nothing short of astonishing, and if this pace continues, he’ll be atop this list before long. His composure, power scoring, and maturity well beyond his years suggest we are witnessing the beginning of something historic.

Cross, Humphries, Taylor and Wade: The Rest of the Elite
Further down, Rob Cross (101) and Luke Humphries (93) continue to reinforce their status among the sport’s elite. Cross, since his stunning World Championship win in 2018, has maintained a solid presence near the top, known for his steady temperament and ability to perform under pressure. Humphries, on the other hand, is very much a man in form. With major titles now under his belt and his consistency improving, he looks set to challenge Littler for long-term dominance.
ADVERTISEMENT
Even in retirement, Phil Taylor remains firmly in the conversation. Though past his prime during most of the last decade, “The Power” still racked up 82 televised 100+ averages — a figure that speaks volumes about his enduring class. Even as the sport evolved around him, Taylor remained a constant threat until his final competitive throws.
Closing out the top tier is James Wade, with 65. Often underrated, “The Machine” has never relied on flashy scoring to get the job done. Instead, his clinical finishing and tactical acumen have kept him competitive across multiple eras. This tally may be lower than others, but it reflects a style built more on efficiency than flamboyance.
Read also
A New Era, Rooted in Excellence
This ranking offers more than just a set of numbers. It tells the story of a sport that has evolved rapidly — where 100+ averages have become the expectation, not the exception. It honours the old guard who set the standard, while highlighting a new generation ready to push it even further.
ADVERTISEMENT
Whether you’re a lifelong fan or a recent convert, one thing is clear: the quality at the top of professional darts has never been higher. And if the likes of Littler, Humphries, and others continue on their current trajectory, the next decade may be even more spectacular.
Most 100+ averages on TV in the last 10 years of darts:
— Darts Orakel (@DartsOrakel) August 2, 2025
🟩 MvG 371
🐍 Wright 164
🏴🧊 Anderson, Price 143
🐂 M.Smith 108
☢️ Littler 104
⚡️ Cross 101
❄️ Humphries 93
⚡️ Taylor 82
🤖 Wade 65 pic.twitter.com/5LoBuxgG2N

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







