
Last weekend, the third and fourth events of the SDC season took place at KK Thun, the site of last year's SDC Tour Finals. Stefan Bellmont took the title on Saturday, while the final victory on Sunday went to Sven Geiger.
ADVERTISEMENT
A total of 87 SDC Tour Card holders had registered, while 29 reserve players were also willing to play. Many great players had cancelled their participation, including Marcel Walpen (wrist injury), Rocco Fulciniti and Jochen Graudenz.
Read also
SCD Tour 3
The tournament was played in 32 groups, 20 4-player groups and 12 4-player groups. Only the two first-placed players advanced to the final 64. The biggest surprise in the group stage was that Ivo Furer and Sandro Egli did not advance from their groups. There were a few surprises at the last 64. The match of this round was won by Lukas Dallmann, who beat Mathias Jost 4-3. Last tournament's finalist Thierry Arpagaus also lost in the round of the last 64, while Sylvia Schlapbach recorded a 4-1 victory.
While Dallmann recorded an impressive victory in the round of the last 64, he was defeated 3-4 by Roland Schlapbach in the round of the last 32. Frieder Lang also suffered a defeat as Patrick Ganter proved too strong with a 4-1 victory. Barry Nelson from Scotland could not continue his strong performance from the first tournament of the season when he lost in the round of the last 32 to Remo Zwahlen, who recorded an average of 80+.
Among the last sixteen, four games went in a tie. Andy Bless defeated Felix Schiertz 4-3, with both players playing exceptionally well. Luis Camacho prevailed in a thrilling match against former SDC Tour winner Patrick Ganter, winning in a decisive leg. The talented Ansh Sood found himself in a similar situation against Roland Schlapbach and needed a deciding leg to secure the win.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
In three of the four quarter-finals, three players clearly dominated their opponents. Stefan Bellmont defeated Croatian Matija Prpic 5-1 with an average of 86 and Camacho won from Italian Alessandro Tocci with the same result. Andy Bless, on the other hand, did not give his opponent a chance in the quarterfinals and recorded a flawless 5-0 victory over Marco Schenk. In the final quarterfinals, it was Ansh Sood who made it to the semifinals for the second time by defeating Christoph Schuhmann 5-3.
The first finalist of the weekend was Andy Bless, who defeated Luis Camacho 6-4. Bless took a quick 4-0 lead, but Camacho made a strong comeback and came back to 5-3 and 5-4. An 86 finish secured Bless a spot in the final. In the other semifinal, it was a deciding leg between Belmont and Sood. The 20-year-old Sood had five matchdarts on tops but missed them. After a few misses on doubles, Bellmont managed to hit double 2 to reach the final again.
After holding his own leg three times, Bellmont got the first break in the fourth leg of the final. He broke Bless with a 20-darter and then kept his own leg with a 17-darter to make it 4-1. In the sixth leg, Bless looked to keep his own leg with a 142 checkout but missed double 20. Bellmont broke for the second time to make it 5-1 and then kept his own leg with a 16-darter for 6-1. Bless struck back in the eighth leg and notched a 76 finish to cut the deficit to 6-2. Bellmont then decided the match after that, capturing his second title of the season.
Read also
SCD Tour 4
ADVERTISEMENT
On Sunday, July 2, the fourth SDC Tour tournament of the season took place. A total of 123 players were at the start, including 97 SDC Tour Card holders and 26 reserve players. The winner of the SDC Tour 2, Marco Obst, and Saturday's finalists did not play on Sunday, so there was a great chance for another winner in the SDC Circuit.
The tournament was played in 32 groups, 29 groups of four and 4 groups of three. Only the top two in each group were allowed to advance to the round of the final 64. At the last 64, most of the favorites won their matches. In the round of the last 32, Patrick Ganter lost 4-3 to Christoph Schuhmann, which meant there would be a new winner in Thun. Sven Hofmann and Sven Gewalt dropped out as they both lost in the round of the last 32.
Saturday's semifinalists were eliminated in the eighth finals. Ansh Sood lost in a decider to Fabio Piscitelli, while Luis Camacho was defeated 4-0 by Sven Geiger.
Read also
In the quarterfinals, three Swiss players won their matches. Felix Schiertz defeated Sebastian Jacobi 5-1, while Sven Geiger and Marcel Gugger won 5-3 over Fabio Piscitelli and Denis Schnetzer, respectively. The other semifinalist was Frieder Lang, the highest seeded player from last season. He defeated his compatriot Lukas Dallmann 5-2.
ADVERTISEMENT
There were two 6-2 wins in the semifinals. Schiertz and Geiger reached their first finals in the SDC Circuit. Schiertz beat Lang with an average of 78, while Geiger beat Gugger with an average of 77.
Schiertz started the final best, winning three of the first four legs to take a 3-1 lead. Then it was Geiger who took the initiative, with a 102 checkout followed by a 13-darter and a 14-darter for a 4-3 lead. That was followed by two legs that went with the darts. Geiger then threw out 75 to make it 6-4.
Schiertz did not give up and fought his way back into the final. With a 16-darter and a 19-darter, Schiertz tied again and a deciding leg was needed. Schiertz then appeared to be on his way to the title when he left 90 after three innings, but he left six match darts unused. Geiger then hit the double 4 to claim his first-ever SDC title.
Read also
Results SDC Tour 3
ADVERTISEMENT
Semi-final
Stefan Bellmont 6-5 Ansh Sood
Andy Bless 6-4 Luis Camacho
Finale
Stefan Bellmont 7-2 Andy Bless
Results SDC Tour 4
Semi-final
Felix Schiertz 6-2 Frieder Lang
Sven Geiger 6-2 Marcel Gugger
Finale
Sven Geiger 7-6 Felix Schiertz

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 4visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026










