Jason Brandon continues underdog story, defeats Neil Duff in Lakeside classic as Deta Hedman reaches seventh semi-final
WDF
Jason Brandon survived a comeback and initially missed five match darts before falling over the line in one of the greatest Quarter-Finals ever seen on the Lakeside stage as he toppled former World Champion Neil Duff 4-3 in sets in a sudden death decider at the 2024 WDF World Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
Brandon looked well on his way but his nerves told as he let Duff in and the Northern Irishman was buoyed by that as well as some crowd trouble with one particular member of the Lakeside faithful.
He looked in pole position to extend his run and similar to wins over Reece Colley and Barry Copeland use nine lives to escape, but in the end it was the American who continues his incredible story.
Brandon performed superbly in the opening legs. Duff hit a 156 checkout but Brandon won the opening set in 13 and 15 darts. It started to become a procession as Brandon won five legs on the spin to take the second set 3-0.
The third set was close but Brandon extended his advantage finding double nine in the decider to move 3-0 up.
Down 2-0 in the fourth set, Duff was getting increasingly frustrated as he managed to set up the big shots but was missing crucial doubles allowing Brandon who was missing chances on the outer ring himself to send it to a decider.
Brandon got the chance to win it but busted 70. Duff hit double five last dart in hand for 3-1 in sets. Brandon returned and continued to be frustrated as he missed break darts. Duff himself had break chances and Brandon made it 2-1. Duff sent it to the decider and Brandon had the throw.
ADVERTISEMENT
Brandon missed 123 on the bull for the match but Duff missed 109. Brandon missed two darts for the win as the nerves got better of him and Duff sealed the set. Brandon broke to begin a pivotal set. But Duff broke back. Again it was sent to a decider as Brandon sent it to 2-2.
Brandon missed 114 for the match and Duff sent it all the way from 3-0 down. Duff pinned 88 to break as he was throwing to go one away from the match. Brandon pinned 48 to stop the rot. But Duff was throwing for the match.
Brandon though it an incredible 148 checkout as he sent it to a decider. He finally fell over the line after a classic hitting double eight.
Deta Hedman will return for the semi-finals after easing past Nicole Regnaud.
Hedman into seventh Lakeside semi-final as Walker stars
ADVERTISEMENT
While Deta Hedman hasn't performed in recent years at Lakeside but was back on song as she eased past Nicole Regnaud into a seventh semi-final.
Hedman has won everything in the game apart from the World Championship albeit she will likely have to get past Beau Greaves to achieve her dream. She faces Jitka Cisarova next up.
Regnaud looked frustrated throughout as she couldn't find her form that propelled her into being one of the real outside shouts for the title this week. Experience won the day as Hedman prevailed 2-0.
She started off breaking the Regnaud throw twice to win the opening set 3-1. The Kiwi had an opening in the second breaking Hedman's throw but couldn't consolidate and in the end looked resigned to her fate as Hedman sealed the win.
ADVERTISEMENT
Jenson Walker started the night. Seen as one of the real talents to watch of the future, he showed that on the big stage.
With an average that wouldn't look out of place in the men's tournament (like most of the boys action), he eased past Mason Teese 2-0 with a 92.56 clocking (101 first nine average) to claim a straight sets win. Living up to his top seed billing, the boys tournament perhaps has the biggest chance of producing the quality over finals weekend.
𝗕𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗼𝗻 𝘄𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗮 𝗟𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗰! 😮💨
— WDF Darts (@DartsWDF) December 6, 2024
2022 WDF Champion Neil Duff is out! After leading 3-0 in sets the American finds the winning double in the deciding leg of the 7th set! #Lakeside2024 pic.twitter.com/0qJNEUwo2b
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026