"This means so much to me - A PDC Tour Card? That’s the next step": Jimmy van Schie sets sights on Q-School after Lakeside triumph
WDFIn a final that will undoubtedly make it into the history books of the WDF, Jimmy van Schie crowned himself world champion. The 32-year-old Dutchman, long regarded as a dangerous outsider within the circuit, showed not only pure darts ability in the final but above all an impressive mental resilience. Against the only 15-year-old sensation Mitchell Lawrie – the revelation of the tournament – Van Schie fought back from a 3–0 deficit to eventually win the title.
ADVERTISEMENT
Afterwards, the brand-new world champion spoke candidly about what this victory means to him. “This means so much to me,” he began, visibly emotional. “I’ve seen Mitch Lawrie play the whole week. Such a phenomenal young talent. I know I was up for a big task, and when I was 3–0 down, I’m like, ‘Oh, Jimmy, come on, fight back, fight back.’ And eventually I got the fight back and that 86 finish was really crucial. I managed to put him under pressure and get over the line to win the title. So I’m very, very pleased that I won this game.”
A 3–0 deficit and a tipping point on the bull
The final initially seemed completely out of hand for Van Schie. Lawrie started furiously, with mature darts that did not suggest his age for a moment. Within no time, Van Schie was looking at a 3–0 deficit. “At that point I thought, ‘Come on Jimmy, fight, fight back,’” he said.
The tipping point came in the fourth set, where Van Schie managed to hit a crucial bullseye. Without that dart, it could easily have been 4–0. “I think it was a turning point, yes,” he acknowledges. “But even if I missed that bullseye, I always believe in myself, even if I’m 5–0 down. I know I’m capable of winning that game. I’m mentally strong enough to try and do that.”
Read also
It was a statement that perfectly reflected what the audience subsequently saw, because after that bull the match changed completely.
180s, trebles and a near-magic nine-darter
ADVERTISEMENT
After winning the fourth set, Van Schie visibly began to loosen up. Trebles were found at lightning speed, especially the familiar treble 20. The Dutchman began sprinkling 180s and even threatened to get the Lakeside audience on their feet with a nine-darter.
Reflecting on the moment, he said: “I first missed that treble 19 and I hit the treble 15 and then missed double 18. Oh God. It is what it is. Maybe next time, we’ll see. It’s just one leg. It’s lovely for the fans as well, but I’m more happy that I won the game. It would have been a confident booster, but it is what it is. And I’m so happy that I won the game, really.”
Although a nine-darter would have been a piece of magic, his priority remained clear: winning the title.
Respect for the 15-year-old sensation Lawrie
Much of the interview focused on Mitchell Lawrie. Despite the young Scot’s disappointment, Van Schie spoke with deep admiration. “He is such a young talent, such a good player and I’m sure he’ll win this one day. … He won the youth title. Phenomenal. He played really well in this. And we also knew he had two games to play. And it takes a long time. It takes a player to play two games in the night. But he showed me really good stuff. He was 3–0 up against me. He played really good. And then he played a little bit less good. But he’s a phenomenal guy. Phenomenal player. His mum and dad are phenomenal people. The vibe is always good in the practice room. So I wish him all the best for the future. I want to see him win this.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Jimmy van Schie fully lived up to his status as top seed at the WDF World Championship
From Challenge Tour to WDF glory
Van Schie’s journey to the world title has been anything but straightforward. Several years ago, he was focussed on the Challenge Tour, but on the advice of his manager he decided to give the WDF a try. “My WDF manager said to me, ‘Let’s go and play WDF.’ I said, ‘All right, I’ll give it a try.’ And I won the Romanian Open. And I played on the stage again. I felt so nervous. I’m like, ‘Whoa, this is something new again.’ And yeah, I won the Romanian Open. And after that, I felt a hunger again. And I kept winning titles, kept winning titles. And I set goals for myself. And the first goal was to win the World Masters. I won it. And then the second goal was this. And I won this. So I’m so happy with it.”
The next step: a PDC Tour Card
Naturally, the question followed: what’s next? For Van Schie, the answer is immediate. “Yeah, a Tour Card, of course. That’s the next step. But I was so close last year. I think I bottled a bit. But yeah, I lost in the final the first day. And then I had some tough games after this. But it is what it is. If I had my Tour Card, then I wouldn’t have won this. So, you know, I’m happy.”
ADVERTISEMENT
A week of celebrations – and puppies
The short term holds no tournaments, but plenty of celebrations and family time. “Lots of celebrating,” he grinned. “My dog actually gave birth. So I had to miss my dog for like 10 weeks. So, you know, I’m going to get my dog and my other dog and the puppies as well. … I think I’m going to go for a nice dinner as well. And then maybe a little holiday. And then prepare for Q-School. That’s what I’m going to do.”

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026





