
We're sure to see some fireworks in Las Vegas on Day Two of the US Darts Masters.
ADVERTISEMENT
The eight PDC invitees all stormed their way into the second round, against opponents who may have had an eye on the impending North American Championship. It's the first time that the top dogs have all met on the second day of play, which makes the outcome of the US Darts Masters hard to call.
Fear And Loathing In Las Vegas
Most of the time, when you're calling the winner of any tournament that features a certain Michael van Gerwen in the roster, the choice is clear. The US Darts Masters isn't an exception. But the Dutchman wobbled a bit in round one against Darin Young. He admitted that Big Daddy's methodical style upset his rhythm a little, which makes Michael Smith the perfect tonic. The St Helens ace was pushed by Jim Long but kept the Canadian at arm's length, and can now have another shot at the man who denied him a first world title back in January.
Ooooh. Oh-ho-ho. Here we go. Rub your hands together, lick your lips. This going to be TASTY.
...or not. Gary Anderson and Gerwyn Price aren't interested in reigniting the rivalry that exploded in a shower of controversy at the Grand Slam last year. The pair haven't met since that fateful Wolverhampton clash. This could be a little awkward, but it's unlikely to be acrimonious. Anderson is the sort of player who prefers to step up, play, and get off sharpish. Price, meanwhile, has become a much more focused player in recent months. The only aim is US Darts Masters success.
Given their quality, this should be an excellent game - despite the pair not playing at their best on Thursday. But if not; can we get just a little bit of needle, please?
ADVERTISEMENT
Rat Race
Now all the North American entrants are gone, Nathan Aspinall is the rank outsider for the US Darts Masters title. As the least experienced of the group (bar perhaps his opponent Rob Cross, who has been on the Pro Tour for two years fewer), and the lowest in the world rankings, the Asp has it all to do. Cross was excellent against the talented Leonard Gates, not letting the Texan get a look in. Do that again, and Voltage will almost certainly avenge a disappointing UK Open final defeat to the Stockport star.
Daniel Baggish's run to the North American Championship title has put Daryl Gurney's 6-1 US Darts Masters win over the Floridian into even starker context. The American scored well in places; Gurney simply refused to give him a look in. The Northern Irishman goes through spells of absolute ruthlessness which make him one of the game's most dangerous players. Peter Wright, a nervy winner over defeated NAC finalist Jeff Smith, is in the firing line.
The Hangover
ADVERTISEMENT
There won't be too much time for the players to recover from their quarter-finals before the latter two stages of the tournament.
We know there'll be a Michael in the last four. Van Gerwen or Smith's semi-final opponent will be either Gary Anderson or Gerwyn Price. The winner of Rob Cross and Nathan Aspinall's meeting will play Daryl Gurney or Peter Wright.
It means we could yet see a repeat of either the 2017 US Darts Masters final, where Michael van Gerwen beat Daryl Gurney, or the 2018 edition, where Gary Anderson defeated Rob Cross.
All the action tonight starts at 8pm BST, with the ITV4 coverage starting at 7.45pm.
US Darts Masters schedule, Day Two
ADVERTISEMENT
Quarter-Finals
20:00 Michael van Gerwen v Michael Smith
20:50 Gary Anderson v Gerwyn Price
21:40 Rob Cross v Nathan Aspinall
22:30 Daryl Gurney v Peter Wright
20:00 Michael van Gerwen v Michael Smith
20:50 Gary Anderson v Gerwyn Price
21:40 Rob Cross v Nathan Aspinall
22:30 Daryl Gurney v Peter Wright
Semi-Finals
Van Gerwen/Smith v Anderson/Price
Cross/Aspinall v Gurney/Wright
Van Gerwen/Smith v Anderson/Price
Cross/Aspinall v Gurney/Wright
Final
Winner SF1 v Winner SF2
Winner SF1 v Winner SF2
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026






