
In the fast-growing world of professional darts, very few
accomplishments figure more in debate than the ‘Triple Crown’. Described as
winning the PDC World Darts Championship, the World Matchplay, and the Premier League Darts.
The idea behind the title is unofficial, yet widely regarded by many fans and players as the ultimate
achievement in the sport.
ADVERTISEMENT
While the Triple Crown has gained traction among commentators
and fans, especially with Luke Littler’s mention of the title after he won the
World Matchplay, there is some ongoing controversy surrounding the inclusion of
the Premier League. The Premier League being an invitational, non-ranking
event. This leaves the argument- is the Triple Crown a legitimate
benchmark of greatness?
Here is all the info you need to know about the Triple Crown
1. What is the darts triple crown?
2. Why the Triple Crown is controversial
3. ‘It’s an Exhibition’ - Why fans argue against it
4. The PDC’s Role in the Debate
5. Who has won the elusive ‘Triple Crown’?
6. What Do Players Think?
7. Should the Premier League Be Part of the Triple Crown?
8. Alternative Views on the ‘Triple Crown’
9. Summing up the debate
1. What is the darts triple crown?
2. Why the Triple Crown is controversial
3. ‘It’s an Exhibition’ - Why fans argue against it
4. The PDC’s Role in the Debate
5. Who has won the elusive ‘Triple Crown’?
6. What Do Players Think?
7. Should the Premier League Be Part of the Triple Crown?
8. Alternative Views on the ‘Triple Crown’
9. Summing up the debate
1. What Is The Darts Triple Crown?
The Triple Crown refers to winning three of the Professional
Darts Corporations most high-profile events:
1. PDC World Darts Championship which is held annually at the Ally Pally in London. It is the biggest tournament in Darts, with the most amount of televised coverage and large prize pool.
2. World Matchplay which is held each summer in Blackpool in the Iconic Winter Gardens. This is known for its long leg format that provides endless amounts of drama.
3. Premier League Darts, a league type format that runs across several months featuring the top players every week, in different venues. It is a tournament like no other.
Winning all three of these across a single year or across a career is seen as the highest honour and achievement in the sport.
1. PDC World Darts Championship which is held annually at the Ally Pally in London. It is the biggest tournament in Darts, with the most amount of televised coverage and large prize pool.
2. World Matchplay which is held each summer in Blackpool in the Iconic Winter Gardens. This is known for its long leg format that provides endless amounts of drama.
3. Premier League Darts, a league type format that runs across several months featuring the top players every week, in different venues. It is a tournament like no other.
Winning all three of these across a single year or across a career is seen as the highest honour and achievement in the sport.
Read also
2. Why The Triple Crown Is Controversial
While the PDC World Darts Championship and World Matchplay are seen as
ranked majors with open qualification paths, allowing access to a large pool of
players, the Premier League is different. This is what causes controversy. The Premier League is an invite only format that selects
only eight players to compete, which is often bases partly on rankings but also the
player’s commercial appeal. The event does not affect the PDC Order of Merit, that
includes wins and losses and also prize money. It has also experienced many formats over the years, including
round robins, mini knockouts and most recently a league format system.
ADVERTISEMENT

3. ‘It’s an Exhibition’ - Why fans argue against it
Many traditional darts fans argue that the Premier League is
more of an exhibition, put on to advertise and grow the sport more than a contest.
Originally designed as a promotional tool to bring large crowds and new audiences
in different cities. The competitive edge of the tournament has long been
questioned. In contrast, other ranked events such as the UK Open, Grand
Slam and Grand Prix feature broader qualification systems and are often more competitive
from a player perspective.
Read also
4. The PDC’s Role in the Debate
ADVERTISEMENT
The PDC has never officially defined a ‘Triple Crown’. However, its broadcast partners often mention the title but also refer
to players performances in the Premier League alongside the two major ranking
titles. The marketing value
of the League adds to the perception that is on equal footing with the two major
titles, a claim that some fans and even players push against.
5. Who has won the elusive ‘Triple Crown’?
Each of these five players have achieved dominance across
different formats and eras making the natural candidates for any debates
regarding the greatest in the sport. Littler is the latest winner with Humphries being prior to him having won the Premier League Darts title earlier this season.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Luke Littler has become the youngest ever darts player to complete the career Triple Crown 👑 pic.twitter.com/GKL9DmuVwC
— Sky Sports Darts (@SkySportsDarts) July 27, 2025
6. What Do Players Think?
Player opinions vary. Some
players like Jonny Clayton, who won the 2021 Premier League, view it as a
massive milestone. Others place more emphasis on ranking majors. Still, most players recognise
the Premier League’s role in raising the sport’s profile and providing
consistent income, even if it doesn’t offer the same legacy-defining prestige
as winning at Alexandra Palace.

7. Should the Premier League Be Part of the Triple Crown?
ADVERTISEMENT
Arguments For
Inclusion:
- The Premier League is watched by millions and offers the second-highest prize fund after the PDC World Darts Championship.
- Only the top players are invited, making the competition intense and high-quality.
- It has existed for nearly two decades and remains one of the most-viewed darts events annually.
- The Premier League is watched by millions and offers the second-highest prize fund after the PDC World Darts Championship.
- Only the top players are invited, making the competition intense and high-quality.
- It has existed for nearly two decades and remains one of the most-viewed darts events annually.
Arguments Against
Inclusion:
- No Qualification Path: You can’t “earn” your way in and can only get invited.
- No Ranking Points: It has no effect on players’ standings or future qualification.
- Changing Formats: Lack of consistency makes it hard to evaluate achievements historically.
- No Qualification Path: You can’t “earn” your way in and can only get invited.
- No Ranking Points: It has no effect on players’ standings or future qualification.
- Changing Formats: Lack of consistency makes it hard to evaluate achievements historically.

8. Alternative Views on the ‘Triple Crown’
Some fans suggest that there should be a Triple Crown that only
includes ranking events, allowing a large pool of players the chance to win the
title. Both the UK Open and Grand Slam of Darts are the titles that fans believe
could replace the Premier League in order to complete the ‘Triple Crown’.
ADVERTISEMENT
9. Summing up the debate
The darts Triple Crown remains an open-ended debate for all those
involved in the sports. While winning all three is an impressive achievement,
its legitimacy will continue to be undermined and questioned by fans and
players. As darts evolves, the debate will grow and continue in defining the real
Triple Crown and whether it will be officially recognised remains unknown.
Read also
Connor Prescott, a rising sports journalist contributing to both DartsNews.com and Tennisuptodate.com, two respected independent platforms in the world of digital sports media. Having recently graduated with a degree in Sports Journalism, i bring a fresh, informed perspective to the field showing a combination academic training with real-world experience.
At DartsNews.com and Tennisuptodate.com, i play a role in producing engaging and factual content. My work consists of breaking news, feature writing, player interviews, and live blogs, helping to ensure both platforms remain trusted sources for fans around the world.
With a background that also includes experience in covering basketball, football and darts i have developed a well-rounded understanding of the broader sports media landscape. I have a passion for storytelling, and a willingness to learn and grow make me an emerging voice in modern sports journalism.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026









