“It felt quite surreal” – Women’s world champion Deta Hedman receives OBE after four decades at the heart of darts
OtherWhen Deta Hedman walked into St James's Palace this week to receive her OBE from Princess Anne, it marked a moment few figures in women’s darts could claim.
ADVERTISEMENT
“It felt quite surreal,” Hedman said afterwards. “She’s so lovely. We were having a right proper laugh. She’s a sportswoman herself. So, we were having a little chat. It just felt quite surreal, to be honest. It was a little bit mind-blowing.”
Only weeks earlier, the 66-year-old had completed the final chapter of her career by winning the WDF Women's World Championship title. The honour may have been for services to darts and charity, but inside the sport, it represents recognition that has been building for decades.
More than longevity
Hedman has been competing at the elite level since the 1980s. She won her first WDF ranking title in 1989 and lifted the World Masters crown in both 1994 and 2013, a gap that alone tells the story of her longevity.
She competed through the height of the BDO era, through its decline, into the WDF structure and across into the modern PDC women’s landscape. Very few names in darts are recognised across all of those generations. Hers is one of them.
This is why the OBE lands with such weight for darts followers. It is not tied to a single recent result. It is an acknowledgement of a lifetime spent at the centre of the women’s game.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
A voice as well as a player
Hedman’s legacy in darts is not built only on titles and finals. She has also been one of the most open voices about the racism she experienced within the sport and the effect it had on her career. She has spoken publicly about the abuse she received and about periods where it contributed to her stepping away from the game.
That honesty is a significant part of why she is held in such regard. She did not simply compete for forty years. She helped change how women’s darts talks about inclusion, respect and opportunity.
Alongside that, she has long been associated with charity work supporting children with disabilities, earning her the nickname “The Heart of Darts” in WDF circles.
And throughout all of this, she worked full-time. “Most people don’t believe that I do have a full-time job and play darts,” she said in an interview with BBC Essex. “It’s just a hobby that I happen to be fairly good at, and I enjoy very much. And if you enjoy something, you will excel at it.”
ADVERTISEMENT
A world champion who still worked for Royal Mail is not a contradiction. It is a reflection of the reality she has lived for decades in women’s darts.
Deta Hedman celebrates her Lakeside win
Standing up for the women’s game
Hedman has also remained a prominent and outspoken voice when it comes to protecting opportunities within the women’s category. In recent years, she has spoken firmly about fairness and the importance of ensuring that women’s darts remains a space where female players can compete on equal terms and build meaningful careers.
Those views have placed her at the centre of difficult and sometimes uncomfortable conversations within the sport. But they have also underlined why she is still such a relevant figure in 2026, not simply a respected name from the past.
ADVERTISEMENT
Her comments this week reflect that continued focus on the future of the women’s game. “At the moment, darts is just having such a great revival and long may that continue, and more girls get into it,” she said. “But it will catch up to a much better level where girls can say, ‘right, this is my caree,r and I can make a good living’. But everything takes time.”
Those words come from someone who has lived the gap between passion and financial reality for forty years.
Born in Jamaica and arriving in the UK in 1973, Hedman built her life in Essex and built her reputation on darts stages across Europe. She stepped away from the sport at times when work and life demanded it. She returned again and again to compete at the highest level. And in December, she finally lifted the world title that had eluded her.
A few weeks later, she stood in St James’s Palace receiving an OBE. The ceremony itself may have felt light, friendly and “mind-blowing” in her own words. For darts, it felt like long overdue recognition of a pioneer whose impact on the women’s game extends far beyond trophies and into the very conversations that continue to shape it today.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026







