"Bookies be careful as it could cost you a lot of money": New major winners not a huge surprise says Dimitri van den Bergh
PDC
Dimitri van den Bergh did not buck the trend of big names heading out of the PDC World Darts Championship on a Sunday night of carnage at Ally Pally with The Dreammaker being the only seed to make it through.
ADVERTISEMENT
But he is keeping his head level and on the ground. He spoke afterwards about how in his view those reaching the top right now in De Decker, Edhouse and Wattimena aren't a massive shock, his views on the 13-year-old prodigy Lex Paeshuyse. As well as whether he thinks he will be in the Premier League.
Read also
"I grew into the game, but fair play to Dylan, I have a lot of respect him," said Van den Bergh.
"You don't want to be a part of that group. But second of all focus because it's not just a finger click that you're through to the next round you need to make sure that you're on point. You've got to do your job."
"I'm already looking forward to the game against Callan, and I will be back on the board tomorrow, because the World Championship isn't over! It might be Christmas, but I've still got a job to do, and I still have dreams to make true."
"Callan is very unstable, he played an amazing first game and I said to him Cal where have you been all that time. He just said I needed to go to the toilet and I said come on man don't be an idiot."
ADVERTISEMENT
"He played against a very strong opponent and it wasn't going as easy as the first game so I can't calculate what kind of a player he is. But I can say that we all know that the first game compared to the second game was unstable so that'll give me a lot of confidence."

Dimitri van den Bergh managed to get past Dylan Slevin on Sunday night.
But he also said he won't rest on his laurels despite the big names getting culled left right and centre.
"Normally everybody was saying that MVG and Gary Anderson were going to bump into each other. I think I'm not 100% sure, it will be the Quarter-Finals. The highest seed in my section is Dave Chisnall, as an 11th seed I am the highest seed in my section. I always push myself to be focused on what I need to do instead of what could happen."
New major winners not a shock, thoughts on 13-year-old prodigy
ADVERTISEMENT
Whilst also saying that in his view, those who won majors this year or reached finals aren't as much of a shock as people let out due to their runs to complete such a feat.
"Since Mike won against Damon, nobody could touch Mike. Mike was incredibly good, from the World Champion in the final Luke Humphries all the way to the Last 16 nobody could beat him. He beat me, Humphries, Wade, Anderson after he won against Heta, that's not an easy run."
"Afterwards Ritchie Edhouse, we have seen so many high quality games from Ritchie Edhouse over the whole year. He hasn't just been doing once, he's been doing it on a consistent basis. It's not a surprise that they all of a sudden got to a final including Jermaine Wattimena. Look to the World Championship, he was doing well getting to the European Championship final. He took it onto the Grand Slam getting to the Quarter-Finals. Now he's into the third round, twice he played phenomenal. Players are not maybe considered higher than what they can do. That's up to the bookies, that's their choices. I am saying bookies be careful as it could cost you a lot of money."
Lex Paeshuyse won the JDC World Championship yesterday and he spoke about not wanting to put too much pressure on at 13 as he continues to rise in stature but that he has good signs that the levelhead nature will continue.
"I've heard his name so many times before. But I've also said everybody don't forget he's only 13, he's still so young. But I've also said after when I've met Lex and his parents that he's in a good place. He's got an older brother so the parents already know that there's a lot of things coming unto his path. They've got a very wise head on their shoulders, I'm very proud of the young kid. Semi-finals Lakeside, WDF World Masters, JDC World Champion, second in the WDF Order of Merit."
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
100/1 not a bone of contention, Premier League thoughts
Also he doesn't see why he should be ranked higher by the bookies in comparison to others. He said he doesn't get odds as a concept and that he is merely looking to reach his dreams.
"Of course not. Why should I. Am I winning multiple majors in a year, no I'm not. I've won two in the space of four years but before 2020, I didn't win any of them. So why should I be all of a sudden high. I keep my feet on the ground, work my ass off. I've got a lot of dreams. I want to earn the money I need to build my dream house, get my dream car, have holidays whenever I want. I can only say thank you to the PDC you guys give all of us professional players this opportunity. All of the players probably don't recognise this as much as I do."
One of those is not the Premier League right now. Van den Bergh continued that he is not focused on that and instead wants one goal.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I'm not focused on Premier League. I've got one goal. I want to be in the top 16 of the two year Order of Merit. At the minute I'm not and I don't like it. Today was my first round, first game and that was one of the first steps I needed."

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026









