COLUMN | Despite Littler dominance and a lack of shocks: Why the UK Open 2025 was a tournament for the history books
PDCNo sooner had Luke Littler lifted his UK Open aloft on Sunday evening than the first voices were raised among darts fans and experts that even the most unpredictable tournament on the PDC calendar had become predictable thanks to the 18-year-old's dominance. At first glance, one might tend to agree with this thesis. On the way to his UK Open triumph, Littler only really came under pressure in his first round match against Peter Wright and recorded the second-highest final win in the tournament's history.
ADVERTISEMENT
But where there is a thesis, the antithesis is usually not far away: the UK Open is far too big and diverse a tournament to be judged on the basis of just one player and a few games. That's why we took a closer look at the "FA Cup of Darts" and show in this article why the UK Open 2025 was a tournament for the history books despite the dominance of the 18-year-old prodigy.
Niko Springer in Phil Taylor's footsteps: the second-highest UK Open average of all time
It didn't take long for the UK Open 2025 to get into full swing: Early on Friday afternoon, Niko Springer produced the second-highest average in tournament history in his duel against Cor Dekker. With 115.92 points, he moved into second place in the all-time ranking behind Phil Taylor, who had set the previous record of 118.66 points in his four-round win over Kevin Painter in 2010.
Springer then beat Dutchman Patrick Geeraets 6-5 in the second round, but lost 5-6 to Ireland's Dylan Slevin in round three. Nevertheless, the 24-year-old once again proved why he is one of the hottest prospects on the PDC circuit. Springer, who recently qualified for the European Tour tournament in Riesa with an average of over 113 points, seems to be gaining more and more ground on the professional tour in his first year as a PDC Tour Card holder.
Read also
The downfall of the defending champion: Dimitri Van den Bergh plays the worst average of his professional career
From record averages to personal lows - the UK Open 2025 had it all on offer. While Niko Springer immortalized himself in the UK Open history books early in the tournament, defending champion Dimitri Van den Bergh played his worst average in over ten years as a PDC Tour Card holder in his round of 16 duel against Michael Smith.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van den Bergh thus remains one of the biggest enigmas of the PDC circuit. After years of searching for himself, in which the 30-year-old Belgian seemed to lose himself in constant rhythm changes and mental gestures, Van den Bergh returned to the PDC stage at the beginning of the year with a refreshing new approach: The Dreammaker not only left his walk-on song and repetitive dance moves behind in the old year, but has also appeared to be back in tune with himself and his game on the dartboard since the start of the new season.
Between genius and madness: Dimitri Van den Bergh's performances currently resemble a miracle bag
With a semi-final in the Winmau World Masters and strong performances against Gary Anderson and Nathan Aspinall, Van den Bergh made a perfect start to the new season. He also won the UK Open relatively comfortably against Raymond van Barneveld and then impressed in particular in his 10-9 comeback win over Chris Dobey. In the end, however, his bizarre performance against Michael Smith was the most memorable - a one-off slip-up or the start of a serious crisis? In the coming weeks and months, it will be exciting to see in which direction the Belgian's career will develop.
The Minehead ball-gate: Curious draw fail makes headlines
In addition to the sporting headlines, the UK Open 2025 also provided plenty to talk about away from the dartboard: one of the most talked-about scenes of the weekend took place on Friday evening when another draw was made after the end of the 4th round. John McDonald and Alan Warriner-Little were assisted by ITV presenter Ned Boulting to determine the matches for the 5th round.
ADVERTISEMENT
When Boulting drew his first ball from the pot and drew the tie between Ryan Searle and Luke Humphries, the experienced presenter made a rookie mistake: Boulting did not place the ball with the number 23 on the table as intended, but threw it back into the pot. Curiously, the trio decided to continue the procedure as normal. Even crazier is the fact that the Humphries ball was not drawn a second time during the draw of all the other games and was the last ball left in the draw pot towards the end of the process.
Read also
Martin Schindler hit by his own dart
A curious scene away from the actual action made the biggest headlines - apart from Niko Springer: In his match against Jonny Clayton, Martin Schindler was the victim of an extraordinary bounce-out.
While Schindler was warming up with the usual practice darts after a break in play, one of his darts bounced off the board and sailed straight back to the sender. The 28-year-old ultimately had to remove the dart from his own shoe, which not only led to a viral clip on social media, but also to loud laughter among the fans in Minehead.
No mercy with buddy Searle: Humphries gives heavy metal a 10-0 thrashing
ADVERTISEMENT
Enough of the Minehead stories - back to the sport: World number one Luke Humphries achieved a rare feat last weekend: his 10-0 whitewash against Ryan Searle in round five was the first 10-0 win at the UK Open since 2016, when Jelle Klaasen gave Australian Kyle Anderson no chance. It was only the fourth time in UK Open history that this result has been achieved.
The lick and a UK Open milestone: The eternal James Wade
Humphries, who followed up his 10-0 win over Searle with a dominant 10-2 victory over Ryan Joyce, was finally stopped in the quarter-finals by The Machine James Wade. In English, the tournament weekend of the UK Open record holder Wade would probably be described with the word "box office". From a lick to injury worries in the final to ice-cold checkouts - a look back at a weekend in which James Wade reminded the darts world that the professional circuit would be a worse place without the 41-year-old.
Read also
No player is as much a part of the UK Open inventory as James Wade, the only player to take part in every edition of the FA Cup of Darts. Last weekend, in typical Wade fashion, The Machine attracted attention for a number of reasons. In sporting terms, Wade became only the second player after Phil Taylor to break the 50-win barrier at the UK Open. By reaching the final, Wade also reached the final of a PDC Major for the first time since the European Championship in October 2023. As a result, he moved up two places in the Order of Merit and regained his place in the top 10 in 12th place.
ADVERTISEMENT
As already mentioned, the three-time UK Open champion also made a name for himself off the oche. Wade's behavior in the quarter-final duel with Luke Humphries was the most controversial when he licked the world number one's neck in greeting. Humphries later expressed his displeasure at his opponent's behavior in a now-deleted post on X (formerly Twitter): "I didn't want to hug someone who didn't deserve my respect after what he did during the match - that's just me being honest."
James Wade also knew how to draw attention to himself in the final legs of the UK Open. Although The Machine was mercilessly outclassed in the final against Luke Littler and was in danger of going down to zero until his first double in the tenth leg, he enjoyed the full attention of the crowd. After the first break of the match James Wade returned to the stage limping and with a pained face. When he injured his hand while pulling out a dart, the James Wade Show was in full swing. Between sporting brilliance and typical Wade mannerisms: the UK Open 2025 exemplified the complete James Wade package.
The youngest UK Open champion of all time: Luke Littler makes history - as always
James Wade was not only dominated by Luke Littler in the final of the UK Open 2025, but also dethroned as the youngest winner of the tournament. As the record for youngest ever UK Open champion still belonged to the 25-year-old Wade from 2008, it was to be expected that Littler would break this record in the next few years. However, the manner in which he broke the 17-year-old record was extraordinary.
Littler beat Peter Wright (10-9), Jermaine Wattimena (10-4), Krzysztof Ratajski (10-8), Gian van Veen (10-4), Jonny Clayton (10-6) and James Wade (11-2) on his way to the UK Open title. The 18-year-old played a tournament average of 104.39 points, with his highest average of 108.69 points in his first round duel against Wright. Littler's 11-2 win over James Wade was also the second-highest final win in UK Open history in the best-of-21 legs format - only Adrian Lewis achieved a clearer triumph in 2014 with his 11-1 win over Terry Jenkins. Littler also broke the record for the most 180s ever scored in a UK Open campaign. This record was previously held by Michael Smith with 40 180s - Littler scored 47 perfect scores last weekend.
ADVERTISEMENT
In conclusion, it can be said that the UK Open 2025 offered far more than just a sporting dominator - it provided entertainment in a class of its own. While Luke Littler made history with his outstanding performance, James Wade once again provided a talking point with his idiosyncrasies. But that is exactly what makes darts so unique: it is full of characters that bring every stage to life. A tournament without drama, emotion and unforgettable moments? That would be a much greater challenge in this sport.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







