"For how well Josh Rock throws, he doesn't win much" - Van Gerwen gave rival a lesson in winning during World Series Finals claims Van der Voort
PDC
After weeks of doubt, criticism and disappointing performances, Michael van Gerwen suddenly found himself back on stage as a winner this weekend. At the AFAS Live in Amsterdam, the Dutchman won the 2025 World Series of Darts Finals - ending a two-year televised trophy drought. "If someone had said that on Friday, you would have said: he is not right in the head," Vincent van der Voort summed it up on the podcast Darts Draait Door.
ADVERTISEMENT
The expectations surrounding Van Gerwen were anything but high beforehand. He was not in great form in recent weeks, and the draw did not bode well. Opponents such as Rob Cross, Luke Humphries, Josh Rock and Luke Littler, all world class players, were lurking. Still, Van Gerwen rolled back the years with some brilliant performances.
Van der Voort: "He really had a tough draw. They were all top players. When was the last time he played such matches in a row? With a tournament average of 102, Van Gerwen proved that he can still play at the highest level. Damian Vlottes emphasized it in the podcast: "Finally the confirmation that this is still in it. That's very important."
The title came at a special time for Van Gerwen. After his divorce, the Dutchman was going through a difficult period. The presence of daughter Zoë gave the success an extra charge. "On the way back in the car, she immediately fell asleep on his shoulder. Eight years old, after a weekend like that, then of course you are completely devastated," Van der Voort said. Van Gerwen himself visibly fought back tears afterwards: "Everyone knows where I come from and how hard I had to work. This gives a lot of satisfaction." His circle of friends also celebrated exuberantly. "Yesterday he had 37 guests with him," Van der Voort laughed. "When you win, you have friends."
Read also
Thin line between success and disappointment
That Van Gerwen was able to win the tournament at all was not solely in his own hands. Already in the first round he escaped against Wessel Nijman, who missed a matchdart on double 16. "It's as simple as that," Van der Voort said. "The first two rounds Michael gets two matchdarts against him. Nijman just played really well. If that 112 goes out, Van Gerwen is already out in the first round."
Nijman played strongly, but looked tense. "You could see from his face that there was a lot of tension. And that's logical, he doesn't have that much experience. But starting the deciding leg with 41... that still sticks," Vlottes said. Where Nijman struggled with the pressure, Van Gerwen showed the essence of a champion: the difference between playing well and winning.
ADVERTISEMENT
'Mighty Mike' then managed to fight his way past Cross, thanks in part to a phenomenal 122 finish, and then eliminated Luke Humphries and Josh Rock in high-level matches. Against Rock, he threw perhaps his best match of the weekend, according to Van der Voort. It marked the mentality of the three-time world champion: "The difference between very good darters and winners. Michael knows what it is to win a tournament. He is not afraid of those moments," Van der Voort analysed.
Even in the final against teenage sensation Luke Littler, he held his own, though his energy visibly sank. "That might still be the only point," Van der Voort admitted. "He has become much fitter, but at the end you could see he was empty. Still, he then throws a decisive 130 finish, which is class."
The role of the audience: entertainment or disruption?
A recurring theme in the podcast was the role of the audience. Van Gerwen knows better than anyone how to get a room behind you, but for other Dutchmen it worked out very differently. For example, Cor Dekker, born in the Netherlands but playing under the flag of Norway, was loudly booed in his match against Raymond van Barneveld when he missed six match darts. "Everyone just wanted Raymond to win," Van der Voort stated. "That can't be justified, but it shouldn't be a surprise either. When you miss six matchdarts, the public becomes merciless."
ADVERTISEMENT
Dekker reacted angrily and did not congratulate Van Barneveld. A striking choice, which Van der Voort said mainly exposed his inexperience: "You throw yourself wrong. Of course that's tough, but then not to give a hand ... that's not strong."
So Van Barneveld escaped against Dekker, but then showed against Gerwyn Price that he can still compete at the highest level. Price's physical condition was remarkable. The dart player has lost some weight lately, but according to Van der Voort he looked too vulnerable: "He was really worn out. Normally he screams everything together, now it seemed like he needed a chair at any moment." His lack of energy eventually cost him his head in his semifinal against Littler, in which he gave up the match despite a 9-6 lead.
Read also
The tournament also once again showed the strength of the new generation of darters. Luke Littler continues to amaze week after week, even though the final this time went to Van Gerwen. Josh Rock also proved his status as an emerging world champion, but lacked just that bit of killer instinct. "For how well Rock throws, he doesn't win much," Van der Voort concluded. "That's the difference with Michael: when he's good, he wins, too."
That perhaps makes Van Gerwen's victory extra special. Against the darters who embody the future, he showed that he still remains a factor of significance.
ADVERTISEMENT
Afterwards, Van Gerwen was asked how it felt to be the first player this year to beat both Humphries and Littler on a big stage as well as win the tournament. His answer was "vintage" Van Gerwen: "Was I the first? I will also be the second and the third." Van der Voort was not surprised by this answer. "He is of the extremes. He can't answer cleanly then."
The question remains, however, whether Van Gerwen can maintain this level. Van der Voort tempered expectations: "This is one tournament, and that's fantastic. But he has to continue on this. After the Worlds we also said: he's back. And after that we didn't see much."
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026










