“Gary Anderson is everybody’s idol" - Luke Humphries pays tribute to Scottish darting legend amid Ally Pally resurgence
PDC
Luke Humphries spoke after his 4-1 win over Kevin Doets with a mix of satisfaction and hunger.
ADVERTISEMENT
The 2024 world champion booked his place in the quarter-finals of the 2026 PDC World Darts Championship with an impressive victory, but he was clear that the job is nowhere near finished. One point, in particular, came through again and again: this level will not be enough if he wants to lift the trophy again.
“It was a strong win,” Humphries said. “The start of the game was a good precedent for what happened, and I carried it on.”
He felt his opening set was close to perfect, but he also praised Doets for the standard he brought early on. “I think Kev carried on from his game against Nathan, and if he carries on like that, he’s going to win,” Humphries said. “He was unbelievable. I said, ‘OK, well, you’ve played well there. If he carries that on, you’re just going to shake his hand and say, ‘Fair play.’’”
Read also
Control without a peak
Humphries said he felt in control early, not because everything clicked, but because he stayed steady over the long format. “There were a couple of moments where I dropped off a little bit, silly scores, but you can’t be too critical in a long format,” he explained. “You’re going to have moments where you’re up and down.”
At 3-1 up in sets, there was no panic, even with memories of matches where a big lead can still be tested. “No, it’s not in the back of your mind, but those scenarios give you good experience,” he said. “You think, ‘OK, I’m 3-1 up. Come into this fifth set and really just blow him away and end the game as quick as you can.’”
ADVERTISEMENT
He did not claim it was a demolition in the fifth, but he felt he played it smartly and capitalised on the openings he was offered. “He gave me opportunities,” Humphries said. “And obviously the 118, when that goes in, I’m thinking, ‘Yeah, you’re in prime position now. You’re going to have two throws to win this set.’”
Averages over 100, but still not satisfied
The numbers are strong. Humphries is averaging over a ton across the tournament. But his assessment of his own form was blunt. “It’s at a level that’s decent, but I don’t think it’s at a level that will win the tournament,” he said.
He also suggested the standard required now is higher than during his previous title run. “A lot’s different from the time I won it before,” Humphries said. “I could coast through a few games here and there. Quarters and semis I did in 2024. This time I don’t get that. So I’m going to have to perform at my best now if I want to go on and win it again.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Looking ahead, he knows there is no margin for error. “I’m going to have to be at the best of my abilities if I want to win this tournament,” he said.
Read also
Gian van Veen: a tricky hurdle
Humphries’ quarter-final against Gian van Veen comes with an obvious edge: van Veen has beaten him four times this year. Humphries did not hide the significance, but he also framed it in the only way that matters at Ally Pally. “If I win this one, then the ones I lost before don’t matter,” he said. “If you offered me: you win the one in the World Championship and you lose the other three, I’d take the win in the Worlds because it gives you the opportunity to be world champion again.”
He described their previous meetings as extremely fine margins. “The games we’ve played before have been really tight,” Humphries said. “This is a long format, something I’m experienced in as well. It doesn’t mean I’m going to beat him, but it plays into my favour a little bit. I know I’ve got a tough game to win there.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Luke Humphries faces Gian van Veen in the quarterfinals
More consistent, with more in the tank
Afterwards, Humphries looked energised by the performance, and he said it felt good to put in a steadier showing than in some of his recent stage outings. “It was nice to be a little bit more consistent,” he said. “It’s been a bit here and there. That game was a little bit more consistent.”
Crucially, he believes there is another gear still to come. “I felt there was a lot more to give,” Humphries said. “I’m really pleased with that win, but I do feel there’s a little bit more in there, or a lot more, actually.”
He also returned to something he considers a strength: finding his best at the right moment. “A lot of times in my career, I’ve found that level when I really needed it,” he said. “Loads of other times I’ve not been good at it, but I feel like I’ve been good at it more than I haven’t.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
New Year’s Eve in low spirits? Quite the opposite
And New Year’s Eve? No wild parties. “Just quiet,” he smiled. “With the family, ring in the new year and get to bed on time.” The real celebration comes later, he stressed. “You only truly celebrate when the tournament is over.”
The turn of the year feels like a fresh start for Humphries. “Last year ended disappointingly. This is a much better way to close the year.” Still, he remains cautious. “It’s been a good year, but it only becomes a great year if I become world champion.”
Admiration for Anderson and Premier League debate
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries also spoke warmly about Gary Anderson’s form and what it says about the current depth in the sport. “Gary is like everybody’s idol in a way,” he said, also mentioning “the fluency, the easiness they make it look” from Anderson and Adrian Lewis.
The Premier League debate came up too, with Humphries weighing the balance between exclusivity and opportunity. “Eight feels really elite,” he said. “I think 12 is probably too much, it’s not elite then. I think 10 is probably the maximum.”
And when asked what separates the very best, Humphries’ answer was immediate. “Mentality is the main thing if you want to be at the top of the game,” he said, before putting a number on it. “I’d say 70, 80, 90 percent is definitely mental, because if you feel mentally good, usually the darts go good as well.”
Humphries is back where he believes he should be: a fifth quarter-final at Alexandra Palace, and another New Year’s Day date with the biggest stage in darts. But he was also honest about what that means for a former world champion. “Making quarter-finals is great,” he said. “But for players like me, the minimum is a final. Minimum is winning it once you’ve won it once before.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







