PDC World Darts Championship Round-up | Gary Anderson rolls back the years as he defeats Michael van Gerwen while Humphries avoids upset against Doets
PDCGary Anderson showed his class with a brilliant performance in his last-16 match to defeat three-time world champion Michael van Gerwen 4-1 in a thriller
between two legends of the sport at the PDC World Darts Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
Anderson started with a bang, taking out 101 on double 16.
After van Gerwen levelled, the Flying Scotsman’s doubling took a turn for the
worse after six sloppy efforts allowed the Dutchman to break. A missed dart at
the bull for a show-stopping 125 checkout proved to be costly. Anderson won the
next two legs and went a set up.
Similar to the first set, the second went to a last-leg
decider. Anderson had pinned double 12 in the previous leg and fell back on the
double which secured his two world titles in superb fashion. He doubled his lead
and moved into a fantastic position.
The Scot came out and held with a clean 67 checkout, but van
Gerwen stepped on the afterburners. He held with a 10-darter before breaking
the throw on double 12. He wrapped up the set with another very good leg,
holding in 14 darts to get a step into this tie.
Read also
The Green Machine should have made it four legs on the bounce,
but five missed doubles allowed Anderson to return to break. The two-time world
champion then missed three of his own to move within one of the set, as van
Gerwen made no mistake on the outer ring. Anderson’s scoring was better in the
last two legs of the set, but that could have been in vein if van Gerwen
managed to navigate the bull for a stunning 164 checkout. Anderson went ahead
once more before holding in 15-darts to move within one of the quarter-finals.
A clutch dart on double 10 from van Gerwen levels up the
set. A period of missed doubles saw the match balance on the fence. Anderson
missed twice before van Gerwen slipped up himself. Anderson continued to miss at
double four before three wayward efforts in the madhouse allowed Anderson to
return, and he made no mistake at that target. He fends off a legend in a high
quality thriller, and will make a return to the quarter-final stage for the
first time since 2022 as he comes up against Justin Hood.
| Michael Van Gerwen | VS | Gary Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| 99.81 | Average (3 Darts) | 99.1 |
| 23 | 100+ Thrown | 32 |
| 16 | 140+ Thrown | 11 |
| 8 | 180 Thrown | 11 |
| 80 | Highest Checkout | 101 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 31 | Checkout percentage | 38.2 |
| 9 / 29 | Checkout | 13 / 34 |
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries with a statement performance
Luke Humphries is a man on a mission to regain his title. After losing at this point last year, he made no error as he defeated Kevin Doets 4-1 while averaging
The pair of them both raced out of the blocks. Three
consecutive breaks kicked off the first set. Doets teased the crowd with six
perfect darts and took out 88 on the bull with Humphries breathing down his
neck. He clinched the first hold of the match to take the first set. This is
despite Humphries averaging over 110.
The pair could not continue at the level they were at, but
Doets drop off was much larger than Humphries was. Cool Hand Luke averaged over
a ton in set two as he started to show his class over his opponent. He took out
66 on tops to brings the match all square.
ADVERTISEMENT
Missed darts on the bull cost Humphries winning the leg 3-0.
It almost made him go 2-1 down, but thankfully for him Doets could not take out
120. He did not waste time in taking a set lead for the first time in the match.
He followed it straight up with a break on tops after Hawkeye could not nail
that intended target. He had all the time in the world on double 16 in the next
leg before double 10 was utilised to move him a set away. He averaged over 107
for that set.
Humphries made it seven consecutive legs as he moved within one of the match with a fantastic 118 checkout. He ended on double eight to complete an utterly dominant performance.
| Luke Humphries | VS | Kevin Doets |
|---|---|---|
| 103.07 | Average (3 Darts) | 92.33 |
| 16 | 100+ Thrown | 12 |
| 15 | 140+ Thrown | 7 |
| 8 | 180 Thrown | 9 |
| 118 | Highest Checkout | 88 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 48.1 | Checkout percentage | 45.5 |
| 13 / 27 | Checkout | 5 / 11 |
Van Veen romps through
Gian van Veen kept his title ambitions alive after defeating
Charlie Manby 4-1. The two players have entertained each other on the
Development Tour, but this was a completely different scenario. Van Veen
started the brighter, holding in 14-darts before a miscount from Manby was not
punished. He backed this with a break of the Dutchman’s throw, but van Veen
took the reigns straight back. After Manby missed a dart for the set, he took
out 84 on double 11 before an 11-darter wrapped up the set.
ADVERTISEMENT
A 107 checkout on double 16 was a positive start to the
second set for Manby, which was followed with a 116 from van Veen. He almost
added a 120 to the collection of ton+ finishes but missed tops before three more
darts were squandered to break. Manby got away with one before the 20-year-old
takes out 64 in two to level up proceedings.
Read also
Van Veen’s scoring was allowing him to regularly storm ahead
of Manby. Two 13-darters saw him take a very positive lead. After Manby broke
back, van Veen was not prepared to let him back in it. He took out a
scintillating 132 on the bull to clinch the set. After breaking once more, van
Veen leaves 16 after nine but has to settle for a 16-darter after a plethora of
missed doubles. He was much more clinical on the bull, where he won a fourth leg
in a row and moved within one of the last-eight.
Before this tournament, van Veen had never even won a match
at Ally Pally. He won the next two legs with a 13 and 14 darter to move within
one leg of a maiden Ally Pally quarter-final. Manby took out 80 in two to keep
his hopes alive but in the end he was no match for the brilliant van Veen. He will reignite his rivalry with Humphires in the quarter-finals on New Year's Day.
| Charlie Manby | VS | Gian van Veen |
|---|---|---|
| 94.74 | Average (3 Darts) | 98.48 |
| 22 | 100+ Thrown | 23 |
| 20 | 140+ Thrown | 11 |
| 1 | 180 Thrown | 9 |
| 107 | Highest Checkout | 132 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 2 |
| 47.1 | Checkout percentage | 48.1 |
| 8 / 17 | Checkout | 13 / 27 |
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







