"He’s closer to Littler than Van Gerwen was last year" - Van der Voort believes in world title prospects of Gian van Veen
PDCIn the latest episode of the WK Darts Draait Door podcast, Vincent van der Voort and Damien Vlottes looked back on a historic night at Alexandra Palace. Gian van Veen wrote a new chapter in Dutch darts history by reaching the final of the PDC World Darts Championship for the first time in his career.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van der Voort visibly enjoyed his semi-final against Gary Anderson. Not just the standard, but especially the way Van Veen did it. “I thought it was a truly fantastic match,” he said. “How Gian played that match, from start to finish: really superb. And he fully deserved to win.” Anderson did everything to turn the match around. “There were spells where he was brilliant on scoring and still Gian had the answer. Just great to watch.”
Mentioned in the same breath as Van Gerwen and Van Barneveld
Vlottes immediately put the achievement into historical context: Van Veen is only the third Dutchman to reach the PDC World Championship final. That puts him in a list that until now was exclusive to Michael van Gerwen and Raymond van Barneveld. “He simply joins the list with Van Gerwen and Van Barneveld,” Vlottes stated.
Van der Voort agreed. “Yes, absolutely. That’s such a major achievement. And he’s still so young, there’s so much more to come. Words fail with this performance.”
Read also
Neither Van der Voort nor Vlottes expected it to happen this quickly. “If I’m very honest, I didn’t think this would come so soon,” said Vlottes. Van der Voort responded immediately: “No, no, no. But no one really saw this coming.”
Van der Voort recalled that Van Veen has also been through a difficult time, including dartitis. That’s exactly why he finds it so striking how mature and controlled Van Veen now looks. He also outlined a key difference from some other stars who broke through: Van Veen did not arrive as a mega-talent who had been tipped for years as a future world champion.
ADVERTISEMENT
“It’s not like he’s this mega-talent breaking through or something, he never was,” said Van der Voort. “But he has developed so much.” That development, he believes, is not only in his throwing but also in how Van Veen approaches his profession. “He’s also very professional. And the way he deals with the media and the things he says, he comes across as very mature.”
Vlottes pressed on, because Van Veen also impressed in a media moment with his comments about Michael van Gerwen. Van der Voort felt Van Veen struck exactly the right tone. “He basically said all the right things. That’s how we know him: whether he’s speaking to the English press, the Dutch press, wherever he is.”
What stood out most was that it didn’t sound rehearsed. “He comes across very naturally. I also don’t get the sense he’s acting. He’s actually very relaxed about everything. Even though so much is coming his way. And that’s admirable.”
Van Veen held firm despite a hostile crowd
Against Gary Anderson, Van Veen not only faced a top darter, but also a crowd that increasingly turned against him as the match went on. When Van Veen pulled too far ahead, the crowd started to get involved. “As the match went on, when he got too far in front, the crowd started to get involved,” said Van der Voort. The dangerous moment came when Anderson clawed his way back into the match. “Then he got close at 4-3.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Afterward, Van Veen admitted he briefly thought it might slip through his fingers because of that. “He also said in the interview: I was a little afraid I might lose the match because of it,” said Van der Voort. “Fortunately that didn’t happen and he beat Anderson on merit.”
That ‘beating him on merit’ was not only down to scoring power, but especially mental strength. Vlottes pointed to moments when Van Veen took hits—also through missed set darts—and still didn’t break. Van der Voort: “He was there again in the next leg. As if it didn’t affect him.”
Of course form plays a role, he admitted. “I know all that. But it’s also class. If you can do that, then you’re the real deal. We’ve had a lot of players in history who had a very good tournament. And when they faced something like this, it collapsed… Or they had an error. And he simply didn’t suffer from that.”
In Van der Voort’s eyes, Van Veen behaved like a seasoned pro. “He handled it like someone who’s been doing this for years. That he knows exactly what to do to turn it around again.”
What’s remarkable is that you could barely see the tension on his face. “He just stays so relaxed. That’s special too. You only really saw after the match how much pressure there was. During the match you hardly saw it at all.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Where does that calm come from? Van der Voort believes Van Veen has played the entire tournament with a conviction he didn’t previously have at this level. “I think that European Championship gave him so much confidence. That he knows he can beat anyone.”
And then there’s that one match that can act as a mental turbo: the win over Luke Humphries. “If you just beat the world number two 5-1… and you’re mentally better in every aspect too: that obviously gives you a good feeling.”
Read also
Details that decided the semi-final
In the match against Anderson, the standard was often insanely high, with legs flying by at blistering speed. Van der Voort referred to a set in which both men played at the peak of their powers. “There were just four legs finished within twelve darts.” And yet, even when Anderson played fantastically for three or four sets in a row, he only won two. “So that shows how good Gian was. In the key moments.”
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Van der Voort, the difference also lay in something you often see with great champions: deciding legs. “Every time a fifth leg is played, he throws a strong leg. He also just starts with 180 very often. Yes, that’s bizarre too. It means you’re in a good place mentally.”
Anderson’s sportsmanship also stood out to him. He didn’t get grumpy or snappy. “You could see Anderson too: he didn’t get irritated or anything like that. He simply did everything he could to win. And he just ran into someone who was that bit better.”
What does this say about the final?
If Van Veen hits this level again, he can really turn the final into a battle. Van der Voort offered a percentage estimate beforehand: “I think beforehand it’s 60-40 in Littler’s favor.”
ADVERTISEMENT
But Van Veen is certainly not without a chance. “I also don’t think he’s very far off,” said Van der Voort. The key question: can he produce it again? “Can he reproduce what he did today? Yes, then it becomes very difficult for Littler as well.”
Vlottes also asked whether Van Veen is closer to Littler than Michael van Gerwen was last year in their final. Van der Voort answered without hesitation: “Yes, definitely.” He explained why: Van Veen, in his view, plays much freer and, above all, more consistently at a high level. “All his averages are over a hundred and scoring. He’s simply closer than Van Gerwen was last year.”
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







