"I didn't know who to turn to, I still don't": James Wade opens up on struggles with son as darting mindset changes
PDCJames Wade produced one of the standout performances of the 2025 European Championship in Dortmund, defeating Luke Littler to reach the quarter-finals and afterwards delivered a heartfelt and emotional interview dedicated to his son, Arthur.
ADVERTISEMENT
Speaking after his victory to the media including DartsNews, The Machine admitted the performance wasn’t perfect but was proud of the way he dug in to secure the win at the European Championship. “Yeah, you know, it was tricky,” Wade reflected. “It probably wasn’t quite what it should have been. I think we should have won by quite a margin, but you know, it is what it is.”
Although Wade let Littler back into the contest at times, he was ultimately just happy to get the job done. “Yeah, I mean, I let him in a multitude of times,” he said. “So, you know, I’m just happy to win. It’s a great thing for someone like my son that’s struggling at the moment. So, Arthur — we can do it.”
The win carried extra meaning for Wade, who noted it was his first televised victory over Littler. “I mean, I should have beaten him at the World Matchplay. It was 14-all, I missed three darts at a double,” he recalled. “I register those things. People like yourselves might not do — or you might do — but I do things like this now just to say to my son, who’s seven years old, that we all have our little differences, but we can do it. And I told you, Arthur — we can do it. Me and you, mate, we’ll do it. We’ll take on everyone.”
Read also
“The sport is changing — but I’m still here”
With darts continuing to surge in popularity and younger players dominating the headlines, Wade was asked whether his performances this year prove that the sport’s veterans can still compete with the new generation.
“Yeah, I’ve been here for 25 years,” he said. “But as I go back to it all, you know, my son’s struggling like mad with things. And as I say — Arthur, Daddy does it, and you can do it. It’s really, really easy. We’ll just keep doing what we do, because there are ways and ways of winners at times.
ADVERTISEMENT
My seven-year-old son will watch this, and it’s really magical, and it’s really important to me. I’m not coming here all hyped up — I’m relaxed, I’m calm, and I’m cool. My son will do good things, you know. I told you, Arthur — we could do it.”
“It’s not about money anymore”
Reflecting on his longevity and continued success, Wade insisted his motivation now lies beyond trophies and rankings. “I’m not really proud, you know — I’m just doing my job,” he said. “As I say, I’ve got a son that’s struggling a hell of a lot, but we’re doing all right. We’re doing just fine. It’s not about money, it’s not about rewards. I’ve done the money course, and I’ve done the rewards course. At the moment, it’s about proving to my son that people who are quirky — we can do this stuff.
"It sounds like a bit of silliness or nonsense, but I need to prove to my son that I can do it, because he said he can do better. And my son will do it. My son, at seven years old, will do better than I’m doing now — a hundred million percent — because he’s got me backing him. Not at darts, hopefully something far different.”
| Luke Littler | VS | James Wade |
|---|---|---|
| 97.75 | Average (3 Darts) | 97.75 |
| 17 | 100+ Thrown | 28 |
| 9 | 140+ Thrown | 14 |
| 8 | 180 Thrown | 3 |
| 85 | Highest Checkout | 121 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 3 |
| 33.3 | Checkout percentage | 45.5 |
| 7 / 21 | Checkout | 10 / 22 |
ADVERTISEMENT
“I want to help others like us”
Wade went on to speak candidly about his personal journey as a father and how personal news about his son has changed his outlook on life and darts.“When Arthur was first born, I thought he’d evade my amazing gift — but unfortunately, he’s inherited it all,” he said.
“I’d like to think that my biggest charm in the world now is — and you can all call it rubbish or crap or whatever you want — my biggest challenge now is to help people like myself who understand children’s problems because they’ve inherited them from their parents. That’s my biggest thing now. I won’t lie or die until it’s recognised as much as I can.”
He continued with a moment of heartfelt honesty: “Recently, when my child was diagnosed with a lot of problems — who do you turn to? If you have a child that’s got a few problems, and my boy is magical as well, who do you turn to?
"I didn’t know who to turn to, and I still don’t know who to turn to. So I believe the PDC will help me, because I know they’re amazing people. And there are dart players outside of that — MODUS have already said they’ll turn and help me. Despite what’s happened now on stage, for me now, I’m driven by something different. It’s the first time I’ve been driven by something different in 20 years.
ADVERTISEMENT
"I’m driven by something new, and I’m excited to do that. I want to try and be an ambassador for something new — something that doesn’t even exist yet.”
“My son is my biggest hero”
As the interview wrapped up, Wade’s focus remained on the same theme that ran through every answer — family, purpose, and pride. “Yeah, I got really nervous, no I didn't,” he said when asked about the Dortmund crowd. “I believe I should have got it over and done with quicker. I’m happy to win, and I’m happy to move forward.
"But as I say, someone like me, who comes from a normal upbringing — which most dart players do — I won’t be ignorant to someone like my son. I’m driven by something new in the last month, maybe two months. Yeah, I’m enjoying things — and my son is my biggest hero.”
ADVERTISEMENT
After more than two decades at the top level, James Wade continues to find new meaning in the sport he loves — not through trophies or rankings, but through setting an example for the person who matters most to him. “I told you, Arthur — we can do it.”
Read also

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






