"I hope the hunger is back in him, because he’s a class guy and player": Jimmy van Schie randomly stumbled upon Benito van de Pas in bar, hopes for Big Ben return
PDC
After years of building, setbacks, and perseverance, Jimmy van Schie finally captured his coveted PDC Tour Card at Q-School last week. Speaking to Tungsten Tales, the Dutchman looked back in detail on an emotional yet controlled week at the qualifying event. The contrast with twelve months earlier could hardly have been greater. Where the pressure was paralyzing back then, this time he stepped up as a player who knew what he could do, what he wanted, and how to finish the job.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I’m feeling very good,” Van Schie said. “Happy to get the card, of course. I’m very curious to see how the year is going to go.”
That it ultimately worked out was not a complete surprise to Van Schie. Quite the opposite. “Yes, I played very good on the first day of the first stage,” he explained. “I directly qualified for the final stage and then I played very consistent on the final stage, so that made me win my card.”
That quick qualification gave him peace of mind. Q-School is known as a gruelling stretch of long days, packed schedules and mental fatigue. “To be honest, I wanted to get it done as quick as possible,” he said. “I don’t want to get a scenario that I wouldn’t get through. I was actually happy with two days extra rest because it was a very tough few months for me. I was very happy that I got it on the first day.”
The difference from last year: confidence
Anyone who saw Van Schie at Q-School last year saw a different player. Expectations were high, the pressure immense — and that is exactly what broke him. “Yes, I think it felt a lot different,” he said. “I’m going in there with a lot more confidence because of course I won the WDF World Championship and the World Masters, so I was not that nervous to go into Q-School this year.”
That confidence was missing a year earlier. “Last year I felt a lot of pressure because everybody was expecting me to get a card and the confidence wasn’t really there,” he admitted. “I was playing well, but the last days I didn’t know what to do. I felt so nervous and just couldn’t hold my nerves and didn’t get it.” This time, the approach was different. “This year I’ve stayed calm, stayed relaxed, stayed focused, stayed prepared, so that made me win my card.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Not everything went smoothly this year either. In the final stage there were moments when things threatened to slip away. “The first day I lost against Damien Moore,” Van Schie recalled. “I started off like a train, a 12- or 13-darter, and then after that his checkouts were just amazing and I didn’t get any chances. He punished me a few times.”
A day later brought another painful defeat, this time against Alexander Merkx. “I was 5–1 up,” he said. “I think I made a mistake there to relax a bit too much in that game. I think I got over the line, but he kept on fighting and he beat me, so I was a bit disappointed with myself.” Still, Van Schie did not panic. “I didn’t play poorly, so I knew I had the games to beat these guys.”
The decisive day: quality under pressure
On the third day, Van Schie sensed the challenge ahead. “I already had a feeling that my draw was going to be heavy,” he said. “And then I looked at the draw and I saw Benjamin Pratnemer. Of course I always take one game as it comes, but you look further and see the winner of Uren van der Velde and Alexander Merckx and you think, ‘Come on Jimmy, you can do this.’”
The match against Pratnemer proved to be one of the moments of the tournament. “That game was so good,” Van Schie said. “He hit a 147 to break me, to go 5–4 ahead. I just looked at the board and I was like, ‘Are you kidding me?’ But I stayed focused, threw a 12-darter and then a 14-darter to win the game and carried on from there.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Schie managed to become world champion at the WDF in December.
The remarkable thing about the final day was that Van Schie already knew he had accumulated enough points. “You always think about how many points is enough,” he explained. “We were like nine with a good leg difference, and with ten it’s almost impossible to beat. At that moment I had eleven, I think, when I was in the final.”
That created a strange dynamic. “I just wanted to win it,” he said. “But I also felt a little bit relieved because I already knew in the back of my mind that I had it. When I lost that last game, I didn’t panic because I knew I already had it.”
Whether the final day felt odd because of that was a question he heard a lot. “I had a lot of questions about that,” Van Schie said. “For me, I just want to make a statement. I want to make sure I play consistent every time I play. Unfortunately it didn’t happen, but when I lost, I just wanted to go home and celebrate.”
With a Tour Card secured, a new chapter now begins: two years on the PDC tour. “In a dream world?” Van Schie smiled. “I’ll get my goals. I always put small goals for myself.” One of the first targets is clear. “I want to play a Euro Tour tournament. I lost twice in qualifiers before, but now I have a lot more opportunities. I want to win a lot of rounds on the Pro Tours and then hopefully the World Championships at the end of the year.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Life as a full-time PDC player
Strikingly, Van Schie actually expects to have more time. “I think I have a lot more time now,” he said. “Before I was doing everything — Challenge Tour, WDF, Modus, local tournaments, everything. And now it’s only PDC.” That doesn’t mean stepping away entirely from grassroots darts. “I will make sure I keep playing the local tournaments and the local leagues, because I want to be as consistent as I can.”
That shift also means saying goodbye to familiar circuits. “On the WDF, I think I completed it,” Van Schie said. “I didn’t win the Dutch Open, but I won the World Masters and the WDF World Championship.” His time at MODUS was just as productive. “I won a special week, I won multiple normal weeks, and I lost in the Champions League final twice. That’s a pity, but the PDC Tour Card is for me now the best thing that could happen.”
Still, Van Schie remains a strong advocate of the WDF route. “Before, I was only playing Challenge Tour,” he explained. “My manager said to me, ‘Jimmy, do you want to join me on the tour of the WDF?’ He told me that if you win tournaments, it gives you a lot more confidence and stage experience.”
That advice proved crucial. “I went to the Romania Open and I won it,” Van Schie recalled. “I felt so nervous on that stage again, but I also felt the hunger again to do it more. I was very, very proud of myself that I directly won it. That was the key.”
ADVERTISEMENT
According to Van Schie, his journey — like that of others — shows the pathway still works. “There are so many tournaments and so many good players,” he said. “If somebody loses their card, most players will go back to the WDF because they love darts and it’s good for the progression again.”
Self-belief as a weapon
Self-belief has always been a trademark of Van Schie, and he believes it will serve him well on the PDC tour. “I’ve already played a few games on the Pro Tour and I’ve also won a few games already, also against big names,” he said. “For me, I play better when I get pushed, and I know I’m going to get pushed on the Pro Tour.”
Asked who he would most like to face, the answer came easily. “I would love to play against Luke Littler, or Luke Humphries, or one of the other big names — Michael van Gerwen, for example. I haven’t played against them yet, so that will be fun.”
Despite recent shifts in Dutch darts, Van Schie’s respect for the country’s greatest player remains absolute. “Michael van Gerwen is still the GOAT in the Netherlands,” he said. “Gian van Veen is playing very, very good, but the respect is always there for Michael.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Finally, Van Schie shared a notable moment from the past week: a chance meeting with Benito van de Pas. “Last Tuesday I was at the Oranjebar, where I always play my local tournaments,” he said. “I came across Benito and thought, ‘Wow, that’s a really long time ago.’ He picked up his darts again and played very decent. I hope the hunger is back in him, because he’s a class guy and a class player as well.”
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026