"It hurt too much to watch the Worlds": Mike de Decker blocked the PDC account and shut himself off darts after Munyua Ally Pally upset
PDC
After a season of doubt and technical tweaks, Mike De Decker stands on the brink of a new darts year. 2026 has to be different. Better. More consistent. With confidence. Speaking to Tungsten Tales, the Belgian reflects candidly on a difficult spell, in which a switch of equipment disrupted his game, confidence gradually ebbed away, and even a lead at the World Championship offered no foothold.
ADVERTISEMENT
A new season, a different feeling
De Decker looks relaxed as he looks ahead to what’s coming. The build-up to the new season is clearly different from twelve months ago.
“I had a difficult year last year with changing to Mission and not getting used to the setup,” he admitted to Tungsten Tales. “But we made some tweaks and now it feels really good. So yeah, I’m looking forward to it.”
The move to Mission proved bigger than expected. After years of playing with virtually the same gear, he suddenly had to rediscover feel, balance and belief. With the season approaching fast, the focus is already sharp. “It’s a week and a half now until the World Masters starts,” he says. “So hopefully we can start the season well.”
Read also
After a year in which consistency was hard to find, that early momentum feels important. And while 2025 was difficult, there were still positives. De Decker reached a World Series final and produced some strong performances early in the year. “But the whole season was with ups and downs,” he reflects. “I had a couple of good games and a couple of bad games. There was no straight line in it.”
He has little hesitation in identifying the root cause. “Yeah, it was definitely that,” he says of the equipment change. “I was too stubborn to make a change early in the season.”
ADVERTISEMENT
A run to the final in Wieze only reinforced that thinking at the time. “I made a final in Wieze and then I thought, yeah, it can’t be the setup.” But the underlying feeling never disappeared. “I knew something had to change and I think I just waited a bit too long with it.”
Eventually, multiple adjustments followed. “I think I made three changes in my darts,” he explains. “And now it feels really good in practice and I feel comfortable with them. So yeah, that’s a big thing that hopefully will work out this year.”
Preparation has also shifted compared to last season. De Decker has been putting in more hours, but on his own terms. “If I have to practise on my own, I get bored quite easily,” he admits. “After an hour I just put them aside and I stop because it’s just so boring alone.”
The solution is simple: company and competition. “I try to invite some friends over to practise and do some Autodarts as well,” he says. “I just play some tournaments on it to keep myself busy with darts.” The difference is noticeable. “I’ve been pushing myself to practise more,” he adds. “A lot more than I did last year.”
The Worlds as a sore spot
ADVERTISEMENT
The World Darts Championship remains an open wound. De Decker’s exit to David Munyua was painful, even if he showed little emotion on stage.
“That game kind of summed up my year,” he says. “I had good patches and really bad patches, and that was one of the patches that wasn’t so good.”
He had taken control early, racing into a 2–0 lead in sets. But that was when doubt crept in. “It was kind of funny because I was 2–0 up and I started to get nervous,” he recalls. “And then when he got his first set on the board, there was something in me that said, yeah, you’re going to lose this.”
De Decker went out in painful fashion against Kenyan debutant David Munyua at the World Darts Championship.
That mindset, even while leading, was damaging. “That’s not a good thing to have when you’re 2–0 or 2–1 up.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Outwardly, De Decker remained composed. Inwardly, the disappointment cut deep. “It’s in the past and it’s in 2025, so we’ll forget about it,” he says. But forgetting wasn’t immediate. “None,” he answers when asked how much of the World Championship he watched afterwards. “It hurt too much to watch the Worlds.”
He even distanced himself from darts on social media. “You can restrict certain pages on Instagram as well,” De Decker explains. “So I restricted the PDC and all darts-related content pages. Yeah, I just couldn’t look at it.”
The frustration ran deeper than one match. “I’ve been trying to survive Christmas for the last five years,” he says. “And then it’s just not working on that stage and it’s frustrating.”
Read also
Those doubts weren’t isolated to Alexandra Palace. “A couple of times, yes, this year,” he says when asked if he’d felt similar nerves in other matches. “I think just because the confidence hasn’t been there like it was in 2023 or 2024.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Again, the equipment change looms large. “Before I changed to Mission, I played with the same set of darts for like eight or nine years,” he says. “So to then have to switch to a different setup, it took me longer to get used to them than I expected.” Others adapted more quickly. “Look at Josh Rock, he switched to Target and he played an amazing year,” De Decker notes. For him, it works differently. “I need to get confidence in my setup,” he explains. “If something doesn’t feel right or something is off, then it just won’t work.”
That understanding underpins the renewed optimism for the year ahead. “That’s why we made the changes,” he says. “And then hopefully 2026 will be better.”
Mental steps
The work hasn’t been limited to the oche. Mentally, De Decker feels he has turned a corner. “I’ve made some steps that I didn’t think I was ever going to do,” he says. “Privately then, and it’s been helping out a lot about how to deal with certain stuff and certain moments.”
The result is a stronger platform heading into the new season. “I’m in a better place with my darts and mentally than last year.”
ADVERTISEMENT
When it comes to goals, De Decker keeps things deliberately simple. “Well, I hope I just do well,” he says. Still, one tournament stands out. “If there’s one tournament I have to pick out, it’s the World Grand Prix, because I have to defend the money from 2024,” he explains. “So hopefully I can go on a run there.”
Beyond that, it’s about rediscovering form. “I want to do well in every tournament and I just want to be playing well again,” he says. “I don’t necessarily have to win titles — just the feeling that I’m playing well would be a massive boost after last year.”
Practice is offering encouragement. “I do a lot of best-of-19 games, so first to 10,” he says. “And my average has been up in the high 90s, low 100s.”
Still, he remains realistic. “That’s practice — everyone can play well in practice,” he adds. “It’s on the stage and in the PDC tournaments that you have to show that.”
Belgian darts: distance and realism
ADVERTISEMENT
When it comes to Belgian darts more broadly, De Decker admits he’s somewhat detached. “I don’t really play many tournaments in Belgium,” he says. “So I don’t really see the talents and the new guys coming on.”
Asked about the next generation, his answer is honest. “I have no idea if there’s anyone that’s going to make it to the scene next year or in a couple of years,” he says. “I know one name and that’s Lex Paeshuyse, because everyone knows his name. But other than that, I just have no idea.”
What he does see is the appetite for darts back home. “When the ticket sale goes live for Antwerp and Wieze especially, it’s sold out in minutes,” he says. “So I really think the Premier League night in Antwerp is going to be booming.”
The Premier League itself remains an ambition, even if it’s a distant one. “Everyone wants to be in the Premier League, or everyone wants to be in the Premier League just once,” De Decker says. “It’s the biggest honour in darts in my eyes, because you get selected as one of the top eight players of the world.”
A home night would be special. “It would be a massive, massive thing,” he admits. But realism remains. “I have to play a lot better than I did last year.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026






