Order of Merit shake-up coming: Why 2026 is make-or-break for Van Gerwen, Van den Bergh and Cross among others
PDCThe year 2026 promises to be a turning point in the PDC world. Not only because a new generation is increasingly making its presence felt, but especially because prize money is being significantly increased, which will have major consequences for the world rankings. Higher amounts not only mean more opportunities for climbers, but also extra risk for established names who have a hefty sum to defend.
ADVERTISEMENT
The PDC Order of Merit remains based on prize money earned by players over the past two calendar years. Those who won big tournaments or reached finals in that period will see those amounts drop off the rankings in 2026. And that’s precisely where the shoe pinches for several notable names. Players who must defend more than 50 percent of their current prize money, and aren’t in their best form, could go into free fall.
Michael van Gerwen: even the elite aren’t untouchable
Let’s start at the top. Michael van Gerwen, a three-time world champion and for years the face of global darts, faces a crucial year. The Dutchman has to defend no less than £477,000 in 2026. That’s 69 percent of his current ranking total of £691,000.
That figure includes £100,000 from the World Matchplay, £200,000 from the World Darts Championship, and two European Tour titles. Those are numbers you usually associate with absolute dominance. But anyone who has watched Van Gerwen closely over the past year knows his invincibility has faded. There are scenarios in which “Mighty Mike” drops out of the top four. In fact, if his season mirrors the last one, even a spot near the lower end of the top 16 isn’t unthinkable.
A few years ago, that would have been unimaginable. Now it’s a real talking point. Not because Van Gerwen is poor, but because the competition is stronger and the margins are smaller than ever. In recent days, Van Gerwen did show he is ready for a strong year. He lifted the title at the Bahrain Darts Masters, although that is a non-ranking event and therefore doesn’t count toward the world rankings.
Read also
Mike De Decker: from winner to worry case?
ADVERTISEMENT
Another interesting case is Mike De Decker. The Belgian hit a peak with a major title two years ago, but 2025 was anything but consistent. That is now hurting him on the rankings.
De Decker is currently 19th in the world and has thus dropped out of the seeded positions. That means no automatic entry for major tournaments and dependence on the Pro Tour Order of Merit. And that’s exactly where he sits on the brink of the top 16.
He must defend a total of £267,000, or 64.7 percent of his prize money. At the World Grand Prix alone, £120,000 is at stake. In addition, results from the Grand Slam of Darts, multiple majors, and a Pro Tour title will drop off.
If that money falls off the rankings without adequate replacement, De Decker could even slide outside the top 32. While the top 32 no longer carries the same status since the Worlds expanded to 40 players, it remains a psychological threshold. The reality is this: De Decker must perform to stay relevant.

Mike De Decker is currently ranked 19th in the world
ADVERTISEMENT
Rob Cross: technique as the breaking point
Rob Cross, the 2018 world champion, also finds himself in dangerous waters. The Englishman is currently 20th in the world and has to defend £212,000 of his £389,000, good for 54.5 percent.
There were bright spots. At the last World Championship, Cross put up stern resistance against sensation Luke Littler. But beyond that, his season looked fragile. His game particularly fell apart at the Players Championship Finals in Minehead. The cold may have played a role, but more importantly, his technique was visibly unstable.
That is a familiar issue for Cross. If his throw and timing aren’t perfectly aligned, his level drops off a cliff. His ceiling is exceptionally high, but only when everything clicks. Heading into 2026, he will have to work extremely hard in preparation to rebuild that foundation. If he doesn’t, a drop outside the top 32, or rather, out of the safe zone for qualifiers, looms.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Dimitri Van den Bergh: mental and sporting alarm bells
Perhaps the most concerning name on this list is Dimitri Van den Bergh. The Belgian has slipped to number 25 in the world and must defend a staggering £260,000, that’s 78 percent of his total prize money.
That defensive burden includes a UK Open title, a semifinal at the World Grand Prix, a quarterfinal at the World Matchplay, and a Players Championship title.
The past year was downright poor. Where Van den Bergh could previously hide behind the argument that he “hadn’t given everything,” that excuse has now disappeared. He went to the Worlds well prepared, but for the first time even there he failed to produce a result.
That has consequences not only in sporting terms but also mentally. Continuously looking over your shoulder at players closing in affects an athlete. The scenario in which Van den Bergh drops toward the bottom of the top 64, or even loses his PDC Tour Card, is no longer doom-mongering, but a realistic possibility.
ADVERTISEMENT

Dimitri Van den Bergh has slipped to 25th in the world rankings
Other at-risk players: Edhouse and Lukeman
Ritchie Edhouse is also under pressure. He has to defend £251,000 (77 percent), while he earned only £72,000 last year, even with the benefits of his ranking position. Without a clear uptick in form, he could easily tumble back toward places 50 to 60.
The same applies to Martin Lukeman. His surprise run to the 2024 Grand Slam of Darts final against Luke Littler brought him a lot of prize money, but also a problem: 67 percent of his ranking (£152,000) will drop off in 2026. Without a repeat of that success, a sharp decline awaits.
Conclusion: 2026 will be a year of reckoning
ADVERTISEMENT
The increased prize money theoretically makes defending amounts a bit easier, but only for one season. After that, the effect will be felt across the board. For players with a lot of “old money” on the rankings, 2026 is not a transition year, but an examination.
Those who fail will fall hard. Those who pass can reposition themselves at the top. The coming majors will not only award titles, but make or break careers. One thing is certain: the Order of Merit will look completely different at the end of 2026 than it does now.
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026






