"I said emotionally: ‘This isn’t Premier League worthy.' At that moment, it genuinely felt like that" - Gian van Veen 'proud' of debut Premier League campaign despite setbacks
PDCThe first season of Gian van Veen in the Premier League Darts had everything that can make a top sporting year so volatile. The Dutchman started his debut campaign sensationally, immediately reached multiple nightly finals, and remained firmly in the play-off race for a long time. But a major physical setback and a difficult second half of the season meant his adventure definitively ended on Thursday night in Sheffield.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Veen looked back at length on his first months among the absolute elite on the podcast Darts Draait Door. The 24-year-old Dutchman did not spare himself. “A five-and-a-half or maybe a six. I’d say a six-and-a-half,” Van Veen judged his own season. “It hasn’t gone completely the way I maybe hoped it would, but obviously there were a few other things that happened along the way as well. Overall, I don’t think I can be too unhappy.”
The Premier League nevertheless began spectacularly for the player from Poederoijen. Van Veen reached a nightly final in three of the first four match weeks and seemed to slot in effortlessly alongside names like Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Michael van Gerwen. Yet a nightly win kept eluding him, and the Dutchman grew increasingly critical of his own level. Especially after the night in Rotterdam, Van Veen was strikingly harsh on himself.
"During Rotterdam Ahoy, after my match, I said emotionally: ‘This isn’t Premier League worthy',” he said. “At that moment, it genuinely felt like that. I don’t think I showed the level of darts I’d hoped for.” With some distance, however, Van Veen can also draw positive conclusions from his debut year. “But the fact I was still in contention for the play-offs going into the penultimate week means I can definitely be proud of that. There are plenty of players who played their first Premier League season and were barely seen afterwards. Luckily, that hasn’t happened to me.”
Gian van Veen finished seventh in his debut Premier League campaign
Kidney stones trigger a major slump
Where Van Veen initially seemed to slot in effortlessly at the top of the table, his season completely changed due to an attack of kidney stones. The Dutchman had to undergo surgery and even missed an entire night in Berlin as a result.
That absence automatically handed him a 6-0 defeat against Van Gerwen, but according to Van Veen the biggest damage came in the weeks thereafter. “A huge impact, definitely,” he admitted. “Not just because I missed one week. Physically, the week after wasn’t great either, although after that it improved.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Van Veen does not claim that without those medical problems he would have made the play-offs automatically, but he does realise how much the timing of that physical blow mattered. "I’m not saying I’d definitely have made the play-offs without the operation and the kidney stones, but I’d certainly have been in a much better position. In the old format, if you missed a week you could still recover later. That’s impossible now.”
The Dutchman also notices he was affected longer by the consequences than he initially wanted to admit to himself. “I probably convinced myself it wasn’t affecting me as much as it actually was, and that’s a shame. I wouldn’t say I’m still really suffering from it now, but I do notice I’m not the same player I was a few months ago. At the same time, I feel like that level is starting to come back.”
The busy Premier League schedule also proved a serious challenge for Van Veen. Especially combined with the many ProTour events, Euro Tours, and other commitments, the first half-year felt particularly intense.
"I skipped a few Players Championship events this year. After the operation, and especially during the Premier League, I probably should have skipped even more for my own schedule."
ADVERTISEMENT
Row around Luke Littler kept rumbling on
As if the physical problems were not enough, Van Veen also came under scrutiny in Manchester after an incident with Littler. The situation sparked weeks of debate within the darts world and was widely covered on social media.
Van Veen himself now seems to have largely put the matter behind him. “Obviously there was a lot of attention around it,” he said matter-of-factly. “But luckily things have calmed down now.”
Read also
According to the Dutchman, the row ultimately had little impact on his performances. “It didn’t really affect my performances, and I also haven’t played him again since then, which probably helps too.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The relationship between the two players also does not seem to have changed materially. “Not really any differently than before. He’s a perfectly fine guy, but even before all that we never had loads of contact. If I saw him in the corridor, I’d ask how he was doing, and that was about it. So there’s no real drama.”

Gian van Veen and Luke Littler had a controversial confrontation in the Premier League Darts 2026
New darts to provide fresh impetus
The difficult second half of the season ultimately led Van Veen to a significant equipment change. He had been struggling with grip issues for some time, regularly splitting his thumb open during last year’s European Championship.
Because he performed excellently then, he did not dare to change his darts. During the Premier League he eventually decided to take the step anyway. “I knew something had to change eventually. But things were going so well,” Van Veen said. “During the Premier League, when things started going worse and after the operation, my confidence dropped. Then I received a new set of darts and thought: this feels like the right moment."
ADVERTISEMENT
For now, that change seems to bring more calm. “From then on, it was simply a case of putting the old darts away and continuing with the new ones.”
Read also

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








