“I walked in there... and it absolutely reeked” - Darren Webster lifts lid on Fartgate chaos and brutal pressure behind darts downfall
PDC
Darren Webster has never needed much encouragement to tell a story, but behind the familiar chaos of ‘The Demolition Man’ is a player whose final years on the PDC Tour became defined by pressure, frustration and the brutal reality of chasing survival.
ADVERTISEMENT
A PDC major semi-finalist, former world number 13 and multiple-time PDC World Darts Championship quarter-finalist, Webster spent more than two decades in the professional game before stepping away. Speaking on MODUS Super Series’ Tungsten Talk, the 57-year-old admitted the end of his regular PDC run became a very different version of darts to the one he had loved for so long.
“At the end of the PDC career there, you start to have to win games of darts,” Webster said. “If you don’t win, you are going to lose your card and you are going to lose money. Everything then is pressure.”
That pressure became impossible to escape. Webster returned to Q-School after losing his Tour Card, only to miss out in brutal fashion. “I went to Q School and missed by one leg,” he recalled, adding that “if I hadn’t turned up early, I would have got in by a leg.” Instead, he said, “because I turned up, I lost the card by one leg.”
For Webster, that was not just another narrow sporting defeat. “The pressure is on then,” he said. “Your head has gone and things go on you. That is darts pressure.”
Read also
Webster rediscovers darts after walking away
The end of Webster’s PDC spell did not immediately become a relaxed veteran tour. For a while, he did not want darts at all. After a Challenge Tour appearance and a return to MODUS, Webster felt things “just got on top” of him. His reaction was blunt: “I said to myself: I have done it for 23 years now. I just need a break.”
ADVERTISEMENT
At that stage, even a comeback was not on his mind. Webster said he “wasn’t interested in coming back or doing any more darts” before his son-in-law started playing and gradually pulled him back towards the board.
Now the rhythm looks very different. Webster is practising again, playing three times a week, and recently returned at the Dutch Open. More importantly, the old survival equation has gone. “Now, for me, I don’t have to win anymore,” he said. “I can be happy, come here and want to win a game of darts with no worries.”
That change has altered the whole feel of the game for him. With work matters now settled, Webster said his focus is simply “to enjoy it and still kick a few butts.”
Webster’s slide did not come out of nowhere. He traces the start of the downturn back to the COVID period, when tennis elbow hit him just before the sport was disrupted. At the time, he had ranking money to defend after regular runs to quarter-finals and semi-finals. “For the six months before that, and then when COVID kicked in, I had points to defend,” he said. “I couldn’t defend what I had got. So I went from up there to basically out.”
Away from the oche, the same period brought another blow. Webster’s business suffered during the pandemic and he eventually dissolved it. He stressed that he did not go bankrupt, but said the process “cost me everything.” That left darts carrying even more weight. “After that, it was all pressure,” he said. “It was all, ‘You’ve got to do this, you’ve got to win.’”
ADVERTISEMENT
Webster sees echoes of that battle in Michael Smith’s current position. When he was 13th in the world and playing every TV event, Webster said he could stand on stage “with a smile” because he wanted to win rather than needed to win. Once that security disappears, everything changes. “When you get to that point, your brain goes,” he said. “Tempers flare, everything annoys you, and that is what it did.”

Darren Webster in action at the 2017 World Matchplay
“I had that one in my hand” - Webster’s Van Gerwen regret
For all the late-career frustration, Webster’s peak remains stronger than many newer fans may remember. He reached World Championship quarter-finals at both the Circus Tavern and Alexandra Palace, made back-to-back World Matchplay quarter-finals, won on the ProTour and became a dangerous name in the biggest draws.
His best spell came between 2016 and 2018. Webster called them his “better years”, and there was plenty behind that assessment. He remembered a European Tour quarter-final where he took out 156 at 9-9 against Madars Razma, as well as a 13-11 win over James Wade at the World Matchplay.
ADVERTISEMENT
One match still sits above the rest for regret. At the 2016 Players Championship Finals, Webster led Michael van Gerwen 6-0 in the semi-finals before losing 11-8. “We won’t talk about that one,” he said, before doing exactly that. “I had that one in my hand and blew it.”
Webster believes the door was open for far more than a famous win. Had he beaten Van Gerwen, he would have faced Dave Chisnall in the final, and his confidence was obvious. “I would have been confident then,” he said. The chances were there. Webster said he had “four or five darts at double” during the comeback. “If I hit them, I win. I didn’t.”
His first major televised moment had come much earlier, at the 2005 UK Open against three-time world champion John Lowe. Webster lost 5-4, but the day stayed with him for more than the result. The cameras had gone to interview him at work in Norwich beforehand, while Sid Waddell later described him as “jumping around on the stage on a pogo stick.”
For Webster, sharing a stage with Lowe meant facing someone he had grown up watching. “I used to watch Lowe, Bristow, Deller, all of them,” he said. “To play him, and then I ended up playing regularly with him, that was really enjoyable.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Taylor lessons and Barnsley chaos
Another major strand of Webster’s career came through Phil Taylor. A chance meeting in Blackpool eventually opened the door to practice sessions with the greatest player in the sport’s history.
Webster first met Taylor after staying with a couple recommended by his mother. A link through the hotel led him to Taylor, who later invited him to stay again the following year. The real spark came in practice. “Phil said, ‘Come on, let’s have a game,’” Webster recalled. “He beat me 16-15 and I hit six 10-darters, twice back-to-back. That is where it all started.”
That connection became part of Webster’s education on tour. If Webster was already out of an event and Taylor was still playing, he would practise until Taylor had finished. “He used to win most of them,” Webster said, “so I would be practising with him all day.”
Not every Webster story belongs to the practice board. In 2018, he suffered a broken nose in Barnsley after being attacked by a football supporter while walking with friends.
ADVERTISEMENT
Webster was wearing a red and black shirt and was mistaken for a Sheffield supporter. He tried to explain that he was in town for darts, not football, but was hit as he looked down at his shirt. “As a darts player, you touch a dart on the nose,” he said of the aftermath, with every throw causing pain before his match against Max Hopp the next day. “That was the broken nose incident,” he said.
Fartgate and the pressure behind the punchlines
Webster’s career is dotted with incidents that made him one of darts’ most recognisable characters. His so-called ‘Watergate’ row with William O’Connor began when Webster accidentally spilled water into the Irishman’s case during a match.
Webster said the whole thing was “news to me until I got back to my room.” He had turned over a glass, poured water in and realised too late that another glass was still upside down, causing water to splash into O’Connor’s case. “I just said, ‘Willie, I just spilled a bit of water in your case,’” Webster recalled. “That is all I know about it.”
By the time he returned to his room, the incident had grown into something far bigger. Webster denied any gamesmanship, joking that if he had really meant to cause trouble, “I would have tipped it over his head.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Then came ‘Fartgate’, the MODUS Super Series incident involving Ron Meulenkamp that somehow ended up on newspaper front pages. Webster pushed back on the idea that the accusation came from Meulenkamp, insisting he was the one who first raised the smell on stage. “I walked in there, walked up the corner and it absolutely reeked,” Webster said. “I looked at the ref and went, ‘Are you drunk?’”
When the denial came back, Webster said he knew it was not him and pointed towards Meulenkamp. The row escalated from there, with Webster admitting pressure played its part in his own reaction. “I did say a couple of things I shouldn’t have done,” he said, “but I took it down immediately.”
The next day brought a very Webster-like shock. “Everyone was going, ‘Darren, you’ve done it again,’” he said. “I was like, ‘What? He’s got me in the newspaper? What for? Him trumping?’”
Behind the punchline, Webster again returned to the same theme. At that stage, he was playing under pressure for money, ranking and survival. “Your mind goes to different places,” he said. The same subject led Webster into a wider point about rhythm, gamesmanship and the strain of playing when every match feels like a must-win. He brought up recent debate around Michael Smith and Mickey Mansell, while also making a distinction between naturally slow players and opponents who deliberately disturb the pace.
Webster said he never had a problem with Justin Pipe, despite Pipe’s famously slow throw, because Pipe played his own rhythm without holding opponents up. His frustration was with players who stop, stare at the scoreboard or take extra time over small actions.
ADVERTISEMENT
“When people stop, look at the scoreboard, take ages picking a dart, to me, they are trying to slow you down,” Webster said. “In my eyes, they know they are not good enough to beat you, so they have to try to stop you playing your game.”
That kind of thing, Webster believes, is easier to handle when results are coming. When the pressure builds, it becomes harder to shrug off. “When you are happy and winning, you deal with it,” he said. “When you are under pressure and you have got to win, that is when the gremlins come in your head.”
Read also
“That is what darts is all about”
For all the strange stories, Webster’s happiest memories still come from the board. His 2017 Players Championship title, sealed with victory over Daryl Gurney in the final, remains one of the standout days of his career.
Webster was keen to point out it was not his first PDC ranked title. He had previously beaten Co Stompe in Nieuwegein, winning 3-2 in sets in a ranked event in the Netherlands. The Gurney win, though, came during the strongest spell of his later career and with friends there to see it. “I was playing well that day,” he said. “I played really well. My mates were there as well to witness it.”
The next day, Gurney beat him in the quarter-finals, but Webster still looks back on that weekend with obvious warmth. “That was brilliant,” he said. “That is what darts is all about. It is about the good moments.”
Webster knows how many bad days the sport can throw at a player. The missed doubles, missed cards and missed chances have all left their mark. But with the pressure eased, the board has started to feel different again. “There are millions of darts players out there,” Webster said. “You have 50 million bad ones, then you have one good one, and you laugh and think you can do it. That is what we play for. We play for those good moments.”
Webster is no longer carrying darts in quite the same way. The pressure has eased, the stories have not dried up, and the old competitive edge is still there.
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 5visitors 5
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026
- Joking aside, it is the second most watched sport on sky (more than golf, F1 etc) behind football only, and in participation is second to only football and swimming. It doesn't get the attention or sponsorship of "bigger" sports because it's not as sexy, but it's right up there.BandB13-10-2026









