"I simply said: ‘I’m worried about you, about what you’ve been doing in recent years’” – Van der Voort unveils confrontational conversation with Van Gerwen
PDC
The World Series has kicked off in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, bringing that annual sense of transition: from the high-stakes World Darts Championship to events where sporting intent can clash with commercial reality. In the latest episode of Darts Draait Door, Damian Vlottes and Vincent van der Voort make no bones about how they view this phase.
ADVERTISEMENT
“You always need a moment to get going again,” says Van der Voort. “The Worlds are so important. The stakes are high, everything revolves around it. And then this follows. That does take some getting used to.”
That observation applies not only to viewers, but is also clearly visible among the players. “You can also tell from the players that it’s not being played with a knife between the teeth," says Van der Voort. "Some do, of course, because they have more to prove. Others you can tell are quite relaxed about it."
The World Series in Bahrain once again handed a stage to local players, but competitively the gap to the world’s elite remained wide. A recurring sight was Abdullah Saeed, drawn against Luke Humphries for the third year running.
“That’s not what you want,” comes the dry verdict. “Facing the same opponent for the third year, and losing 6-0 again. You want someone different at least once. If only so you can say in ten years: I played him.”
That perspective may be the only bright spot. Athletically, the gulf was painfully clear again. “He probably won’t win a leg even over ten tries,” says Van der Voort. “In previous years he hadn’t even had a dart at a double.”
Fellow Bahraini Basem Mahmood also showed the level gap remains significant, though he did at least nick a leg against Danny Noppert. “Slightly better,” Van der Voort calls it. “But not by much.” The conclusion is blunt and clear: “You always hope a new sensation emerges from somewhere, but I don’t get the feeling Bahrain is about to produce another Littler.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Meaningful win for Van Gerwen in Bahrain
A sporting high point in Bahrain was Michael van Gerwen’s tournament win, as he saw off Gian van Veen in the final. A match-up with more weight than it might seem at first glance.
“Gian was genuinely playing to win,” notes Van der Voort. “it was his first World Series appearance outside the Netherlands. And Van Gerwen has something to prove this year, so he’s clearly working towards top form. Both of them were really there to perform." That dynamic is intriguing, especially now that Van Veen is on paper the Dutch number one. “The media mention that a lot,” says Vlottes. “So it’s important for Michael to just beat him a few times.”
Van Gerwen did that, but not without resistance. Van Veen battled back and even finished the match stronger. “But Michael kept his edge,” analyses Van der Voort. “You saw that go wrong at the European Championship. Not now.”
A crucial 103 checkout helped. “Gian was better at the end,” admits Van der Voort. “But he was already 6-2 down. And Michael didn’t let that momentum flip.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The victory feels like a first step in the right direction, not a finish line. “You can see he’s not there yet,” Van der Voort says candidly. "There’s still a lot of work to do. But this is a great boost heading into the new season."
Van Gerwen started 2026 in style by winning the Bahrain Darts Masters.
“I told him: I’m worried about you”
Perhaps the most telling moment of the podcast is Van der Voort’s candid account of a conversation he had with Van Gerwen, announced during the Worlds. "I clearly explained everything I think is going wrong," he says. “And it wasn’t just between him and me. There were several people there. I simply said: ‘I’m worried about you, about what you’ve been doing in recent years.’”
According to Van der Voort, Van Gerwen had long known himself that things weren’t right. “He said: I knew you had a point, but I wasn’t ready. Because of everything going on privately. Because of everything happening in my life.” Priorities lay elsewhere. “His children, his private life, everything. He used this period to do all sorts of things, but not to put his priorities on darts.”
ADVERTISEMENT
The realization came later. “He said: I knew it was going wrong, but I couldn’t turn it around. And now I know what went wrong. And now we’re heading in the right direction.” According to Van der Voort, they are back on the same page. “It just went wrong in recent years because of his situation at home. He simply couldn’t get it done and then you start pushing back against it. He just couldn’t summon it. That’s not strange either, because he’s been at the top of the world for twenty years. I hope the tide has turned now.”
Read also
For Gian van Veen, Bahrain mainly confirmed the strong spell he’s in. “You’re in the final, you show again that you belong,” says Van der Voort. “We already knew that, but this helps.”
That matters, especially with a first Premier League season on the horizon. “Everyone has an opinion. And if you lose early twice, they’ll say: told you so.” Van Veen, however, held firm. “It looks polished, steady, and he’s in form. That’s mentally very important.”
A striking moment came during the quarterfinal between Van Veen and Noppert, when out of nowhere everything went black after a power outage. “All the lights going out… how is that possible?” wondered Vlottes. Van der Voort recalls similar situations. We had it once in Exeter. It was too cold in the practice area and the PDC thought: we’ve only been playing here for the sixth year, let’s do something about it. During warm-up they brought in heaters and then all the fuses blew as well. Everyone was sitting in the dark then too.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Van der Voort found it a remarkable moment anyway. “It took a while as well, because it was pretty dark. You couldn’t see anything,” he said with a laugh. “You also have to watch your step on stage so you don’t trip over anything. That can be tricky in the dark.”
Littler, motivation and the limits of entertainment
The name of Luke Littler also came up, who looked “unmotivated” against Gerwyn Price. Showboating, different darts and unusual checkouts drew frowns from many darts fans. “That’s what a tournament like this lends itself to,” Van der Voort qualified. “The PDC is often about entertainment, and these little events were created to make money. Not for the players… then you get these kinds of things. The calendar is so busy.”
Read also
Van der Voort was then told that players can be fined if they take the stage unmotivated. He finds that a difficult line to draw. “That’s very hard to determine,” he believes. “With him it often looks unmotivated and then everything lands in the treble. I do get it, but I’m not much in favor of handing out fines and that sort of thing.”
ADVERTISEMENT
“Bookmakers won’t be too happy about it,” Vlottes noted. But Van der Voort feels that’s the PDC’s own doing. “They’ve brought that on themselves a bit by staging these kinds of tournaments. Then it doesn’t matter all that much.”
Finally, the new Euro Tour rules were discussed, which were changed again right before the start. “They’ve changed it back again,” sighed Van der Voort.
His criticism is structural. “Change it once and do it right. Instead of throwing everything around every year. There are people there who have never played sports themselves. Great businesspeople, but zero understanding of sport. Go talk to former players. John Part, Wayne Mardle, Mark Webster. Ask what’s fair.” The adjustments are, in his view, correct in substance, but not in process. “This should never have been decided like this,” he concluded on a critical note.

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 3visitors 3
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







