Luke Littler denies Michael van Gerwen back-to-back World Series titles, seals inaugural Saudi Arabia Darts Masters
PDC
It is a fifth World Series of Darts crown for Luke Littler who has scooped the inaugural Saudi Arabia Darts Masters in Riyadh defeating Michael van Gerwen in the final 8-5.
ADVERTISEMENT
Van Gerwen has shown that he is very much still a player to watch in title contention during the Middle Eastern sojourn as he won Bahrain and lost here to Littler in the final of Saudi Arabia. In the end, Littler who hit a 111 average earlier in seeing off Gian van Veen hit 104.84, 8/13 on the doubles and a high checkout of 132.
It is his first World Series of the year and joins his double last year in Australia and New Zealand as well as Bahrain previously and Poland also in 2024.
It was all Littler to start. He hit a 180 and double 20 to hold and then a 132 checkout to lead 2-0. He was 3/3 on the doubles as he went 3-0 up. Van Gerwen missed 91 as Littler sealed a 4-0 lead.
Read also
Van Gerwen pinned 121 for a 12-darter to break and he was finally on the board at 4-1 down. Van Gerwen missed three darts and Littler after missing 128 returned only to miss darts himself to break straight back and Van Gerwen took the tricky 13 on double four for a 4-2 deficit. An 86 checkout for MVG saw him 4-3 down and throwing for parity.
Van Gerwen missed 151 and was made to pay missing another chance and Littler broke with a 115 for 5-3. Van Gerwen went 5-4 down but Littler hit the afterburners picking out 65 and then sealing the win from there 8-5.
Van Gerwen defies Aspinall as Price downed by Littler
ADVERTISEMENT
That bid for a back-to-back World Series crown for Van Gerwen went through a certain Nathan Aspinall.
He overcame a 4-2 deficit to sink 'The Asp'. Van Gerwen held with a 154 checkout for 1-1. Aspinall hit double 12 for 2-1. Van Gerwen hit double four to draw level at 2-2.
Aspinall needed to hit a 105 to hold with Van Gerwen sat on double 20. He did so and it was 3-2. A superb 128 checkout from The Asp followed who went 4-2 up. Aspinall missed 150 and Van Gerwen returned for 51. He was now 4-3 down. MVG held for 4-4. He broke to make it 5-4 hitting 96 for a 12-darter.
Aspinall broke back hitting double 20 for 5-5. But Van Gerwen surged in style to win 7-5.
ADVERTISEMENT
Then in the other semi-final, Luke Littler found his way past Gerwyn Price. To start, Price missed 167 for 2-0 and Littler was back for 121 to make it 1-1.
Price held after missing 170 pinning a 25 checkout. With Price sat on 68, Littler had to hit 41 to hold for 2-2. Price hit double four to lead 3-2. He had the impetus as he hit a 100 checkout for 4-2.
But his issue throughout the tie was golden chances missed as he missed two chances to hold which saw Littler go 4-3 down then 5-4 up. Littler held to go one away on double 10 and sealed the deal 7-5. Price was way back on 158 and after missing 130, Littler returned for 130 to seal teh win.
Littler dazzles in Quarter-Finals as Price seals dramatic Humphries win
Luke Littler produced the performance of the weekend during the Quarter-Finals averaging 111.58 in seeing off Gian van Veen in a World final repeat surging in a 6-4 win.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was all Van Veen to start. A 12-darter and a break for Van Veen to begin with a 41 checkout for 1-0 and he held throw to go two up. Littler cut the gap at 3-1 down hitting 56. Littler held with a 76 checkout and he was one behind at 3-2.
Van Veen kept him at arms length with a break back being quelled by GVV The Giant pinning a 46 checkout and was throwing to go one away. But this is where the late surge came as The Nuke broke back with an 11-darter to make it 4-4. He broke again to win it as he hit a 124 checkout to seal the win 6-4.
While after that, it was drama personified as Gerwyn Price nicked his win over Luke Humphries in a decider to set up yet another meeting as mentioned with 'The Nuke' who he beat last week in Bahrain.
A 108 checkout to start for Price who held to lead. After missing 41 initially and further darts, Price returned for a 13-darter to break for 2-0. Price hit 75 to hold with Humphries unable to hit 135 and he made it 3-0. Humphries finally got on the board and broke with a 70 checkout to make it 3-2.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries missed three darts to hold but Price missed a dart at 80 to seal a break back and it was now 3-3. Price responded with a 97 to make it 4-3. But a 101 to leave 64 for Humphries. He missed a dart for it and Price returned only to stumble into treble five and Humphries made it 4-4. Suddenly he was 5-4 up missing 129 and Price set up 82 but missed a dart and Humphries returned to break for 5-4. Price picked his pocket after Humphries missed 86 for the match. An 81 checkout pinned and it was 5-5.
Price hit 134, 100 and 139 to be first to a finish. He sat on 128 with Humphries not able to pounce. He left 40 with Humphries merely having to hit and hope. This was to no avail as Price sealed it.
While prior to that there were wins for Nathan Aspinall and Michael van Gerwen who met in that semi-final aforementioned.
Van Gerwen took down Stephen Bunting who only averaged 81 in his defeat. Albeit it was a match characterised by breaks of throw. Van Gerwen went 3-2 up but Bunting hit double 20 to make it 3-3. Van Gerwen hit a 120 checkout to break and goes 4-3 up.
Bunting made it 4-4 after Van Gerwen missed dart after dart to hold. Van Gerwen breaks again pinning 66 for 5-4 and was now throwing for the win which he sealed with a 127.
ADVERTISEMENT
While Nathan Aspinall took down Man Lok Leung. The final bastion of Asian darts left going into this session. He started the brighter of the two taking the lead but Aspinall broke with a 59 checkout.
Leung stayed in it with a 64 checkout but could not break back as Aspinall maintained his impetus. Aspinall after Leung couldn't hit 68 to break stumbled over the line to hold at 5-3 and was now throwing for the win. Aspinall moved into the semi-finals after pinning double 16 for 6-4.
Read also

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








