"If I’ve upset a few media outlets for a couple of weeks, then so be it": Luke Humphries glad to quieten World Number One noise after Littler exit
PDC
Luke Humphries says he had to “dig deep” to overcome Cameron Menzies in a gripping encounter at the 2025 European Championship praising his Scottish opponent’s performance while insisting his focus remains on winning major titles rather than holding onto the world number one spot.
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries battled through a tense clash 10-9 with Menzies to book his place in the Quarter-Finals at the European Championship, and he admitted afterwards including to DartsNews that the match was every bit as tough as it looked. “Yeah, I'd assess it the same to be honest, it was a great game of darts,” Humphries said. “Cameron was really good in patches there to be fair. I feel it takes two to make a great game, and we both played well. It probably deserved to go all the way — it was really close. I felt like I was playing well scoring-wise, and in a couple of legs Cameron was just superb. I think he threw 11-, 12-, 13-darters, whatever it was. He really pushed me hard and yeah, he played well. I did as well.”
The world number one showed visible emotion on stage at times, roaring himself on during key moments — something he admits can bring out his best form when controlled properly. “Yeah, I think sometimes when I get a little bit fired up, I’m very dangerous because then I’m really determined and I don’t want to lose,” he explained. “Sometimes when you’re relaxed, you’re kind of open to the fact of losing — I don’t know how to put it, but when I’m fired up, losing isn’t an option.
“That suits me sometimes, but I can’t do it all the time. If I did that for 19 legs, I’d be worn out! But yeah, something was firing me up tonight and I’m proud of the way I came back, finished the game off and took it from the jaws of defeat to win.”
Read also
Menzies distraction and big names falling being far from the truth
There were also some brief moments of distraction on stage including Menzies dropping a dart and some tension in the arena, but Humphries was quick to clarify there was no malice involved.
“Yeah, it wasn’t the crowd. The crowd did nothing wrong. And I don’t think Cameron was doing anything on purpose — he’s not that kind of guy,” Humphries said. “But there were little things I could hear, and when you’re in a stressful situation, the tiniest things can really annoy you. It was annoying me a bit, and sometimes when it’s happening, you’re looking back thinking, ‘What are you doing?’ But again, he wasn’t doing it deliberately. He did stop in the end. It was just nervous energy, really.”
ADVERTISEMENT
With several seeded players falling earlier in the session, Humphries was asked whether there was added pressure on him as the world number one to avoid joining them on the way out — but he dismissed the idea that the tournament had opened up.
“I still think there are a lot of big names in this tournament,” he insisted. “People are saying all the big names have gone, but that’s not true. James Wade’s still in, Gian van Veen’s still in, Michael van Gerwen’s still in — they’re all big names. Danny Noppert as well, he’s a big name in my eyes.
“That’s four or five right there, and there are still plenty of top players left. It’s going to be a really tough one to win.”
World Number One distracted narrative
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries also addressed the ongoing narrative surrounding the world number one ranking, with social media and pundits heavily discussing his battle to retain top spot. For the Humphries however that chase is secondary to adding more silverware to his growing collection as Luke Littler fell earlier tonight.
“Yeah, I mean if that was the whole agenda for the week, then it’s a bit of a shame to be honest,” he said. “Being world number one is great, but I’d rather be a major winner, a major champion, than just number one. If I’ve upset a few media outlets for a couple of weeks, then so be it — I’m sure they had a few things ready to post about Luke losing it, but fortunately I’ve upset them all, so I apologise!
“I’m still fighting. Like I said yesterday, I’m not going to give it away easily. I’ll try my hardest to keep hold of it. Maybe some of the focus has been too much on that instead of the tournament itself — I’ve seen that on social media, like ‘This is what Luke needs to do to stay number one.’
“It probably puts him under pressure as well. He’ll probably get it eventually, but right now, this is a massive tournament to win. That’s more important than the race for number one.”
Luke Littler lost on Saturday night.
ADVERTISEMENT
Having already won multiple majors in the past two years, Humphries now has his sights set on another big title to add to his legacy. “Yeah, of course I really want to win it,” he said. “I think this is the third or fourth time I’ve made it to the final here, so I really want to go one better.
“I know if I did win overall, I’d stay world number one, but it’s not about that. I want to win this as a major because it’s such an amazing one to win. It’s really tough — you’ve got all the best players in the world here.
“It’d be another one to tick off, yeah, but then I’ll want my tenth, and then I’ll want to overtake people. I want to create history and a legacy, like I always tell you guys. So this is another step forward, but tomorrow will be another tough day and another tough game against James.”
And Humphries was full of praise for Menzies, who pushed him all the way in a thrilling encounter. “Yeah, I think he’s got the talent and the scoring power,” he said. “Tonight he showed a lot of bottle in big moments. Usually when you put him under pressure, he can sometimes fold a little bit, but tonight he didn’t. I was putting him under immense pressure, scoring well, and he stood up to it.
“He’ll be disappointed to lose, but I think he’ll come away thinking, ‘I really pushed the world number one — I’m not far away.’ I like Cameron, I always get on well with him. He’s got the potential, but he has to make sure he’s mentally strong in the big moments, because that’s what separates the good players from the great players.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






