"If you keep stopping, it probably gets worse, so you’ve just got to get on with it": Luke Woodhouse unhappy with whistlers post Krcmar win
PDCLuke Woodhouse admitted he felt the weight of expectation and nerves at Alexandra Palace as he battled through a scrappy opening-round victory at the 2026 PDC World Darts Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
Competing at the Worlds as a seed for the first time in his career, Woodhouse arrived in north London ranked 25th in the world — his highest seeding to date — and acknowledged that the label brought with it added pressure, even if the occasion itself still felt familiar.
“It’s the first year I’ve been a seed at the Worlds,” Woodhouse said. “I know we’re all starting from the first round, but having that sort of seed tag does come with a bit more pressure. I felt all right on the stage, it just didn’t really click. Hopefully next round I can play to my full potential.”
Woodhouse not at his best but through
Despite not producing his best darts, Woodhouse found a way to come through a tense contest, describing the performance as far from perfect but ultimately job done.
“It probably wasn’t the best performance in the world,” he admitted. “When he missed those six darts to win the third set, I just knew I had to win that set. Then it was my darts. I was very, very lucky — he didn’t really perform that well in the last set. It was a scrappy game, but I’m happy to come through.”
Read also
The build-up to the tournament had not been straightforward either. Woodhouse revealed that his practice sessions in the week leading up to the match had caused him concern, particularly given the importance of the World Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I’ve been texting my wife and a couple of my mates saying, ‘I don’t even know what’s going on here,’” he explained. “Because it’s such a big tournament, I probably up my practice quite a lot and put myself under a bit of unneeded pressure. But I’m always fairly confident that once I’m on the stage it’ll click. I’m not saying it did today, but I managed to get through.”
The match itself was played in a lively atmosphere, with Woodhouse’s opponent Boris making his presence felt both physically and vocally on stage. While acknowledging his opponent’s size and celebrations, Woodhouse was unfazed. “As a dart player, no, he’s not intimidating,” Woodhouse said. “As a person, yeah — he’s huge. But he’s a really nice, polite guy. Before the game he came up and shook my hand backstage. When he gave it big after winning a set, he’s got every right to do that.”
Krcmar form and whistling
Woodhouse also touched on the challenge of playing against an opponent whose recent form was largely unknown, given Boris’s time away from the PDC tour. “I knew he’d turn up prepared and know what this is all about,” he said. “I wanted to try and put him away early, but it didn’t work out that way. The win is the most important thing.”

Luke Woodhouse misses darts and his reaction says it all.
ADVERTISEMENT
Nerves, he insisted, were inevitable on such a stage — regardless of ranking or reputation. “Every player feels edgy first round,” Woodhouse said. “It doesn’t matter if you’re Luke Humphries or anyone else. Nobody comes up here thinking they’re just going to breeze through it. You come up the hill, see Alexandra Palace — it’s a different feeling. You can’t prepare yourself for it.”
The contest was also disrupted by noticeable whistling from the crowd, something Woodhouse admitted briefly affected his rhythm. “It shouldn’t be part of the game, but it is what it is,” he said. “If you keep stopping, it probably gets worse, so you’ve just got to get on with it.”
The Ally Pally wasp and a deep Ally Pally run
Adding to the Alexandra Palace chaos was yet another appearance from the now-infamous Ally Pally wasps, with Woodhouse becoming the latest player to be distracted mid-match. “It’s a bizarre thing,” he laughed. “The other Luke had it on the first night, now I’ve got it. It’s not helpful, is it? It’s been a thing forever here. When it flies through your vision on the board, you can’t control it — you’ve just got to deal with it.”
Looking ahead, Woodhouse remains grounded despite reaching the last 16 at last year’s World Championship and now progressing once again. “If I can make the last 16 again, it’d be brilliant,” he said. “But it’s a boring answer — the next game, I’ll take it. Every round is a new game of darts.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He will face either Martin Lukeman or Max Hopp next, but insists there is no preference. “It doesn’t really matter who I play,” Woodhouse said. “If I go up there and play as well as I can, I’ll put in a good performance, and hopefully that means I win.”
While realistic about the gap between himself and the sport’s elite, Woodhouse believes a deeper run is possible if he can relax and trust his game. “Luke Littler and Luke Humphries are where they are because of what they’ve done over the last few years — they’re probably on a different level,” he said. “But if I can relax in the next game, I genuinely believe I can make it after Christmas. Then who knows?”
And despite carrying the banner for a region with limited representation, Woodhouse insists his focus remains firmly on the oche. “I’ve not even thought about it,” he said. “I’ll get some really good support back home in Worcestershire, plenty of messages, and everyone’s behind me. Hopefully I can go on and make them proud.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







