"I’d like to buy next door’s bungalow and expand the garden": Andrew Gilding names £1million prize money purchase without neighbours knowing plan
PDC
Andrew Gilding admitted he was left surprised after booking his place in the next round of the 2026 World Darts Championship, insisting that his opponent Cam Crabtree never quite found his best form on the Alexandra Palace stage.
ADVERTISEMENT
Gilding averaged 97.9 and hit an incredible 161 checkout to overcome the debutant who shone on the Development Tour and also at times at the Grand Slam of Darts but he faltered on his PDC World Darts Championship debut.
“Surprised, actually,” Gilding said when asked how he felt after the win. “Cam didn’t play as well as he could.”
Nervy opponent
Despite that assessment, Gilding was quick to acknowledge the quality of the young challenger and suggested that experience may have played a decisive role on the night. Facing Crabtree on the sport’s biggest stage, Gilding felt the occasion may have told. “It seems like it, doesn’t it?” he said. “It seemed like he got a little bit nervous up there. I don’t know, but that was his first time on the stage and definitely my seventh time. I’ve got over the nerves somewhat.”
That experience continues to serve Gilding well under the bright lights. A World Matchplay quarter-finalist earlier in the year, he remains at ease on the sport’s biggest platforms and admitted he thrives on the atmosphere. “That’s pretty great, actually,” he said. “There’s something about the atmosphere. I used to say the Matchplay was the loudest venue, but it seems to be louder here.”
Read also
Having previously reached the last 32 at Alexandra Palace, Gilding is keen to push deeper into the tournament, though his outlook remains typically measured. “I’ll take it one game at a time,” he said. “I always do.”
ADVERTISEMENT
That grounded approach has helped turn Gilding into something of a cult hero at Ally Pally, where the crowd once again rose to their feet. Asked what brings out the best in him with the fans behind him, he shrugged off the praise. “I don’t know, really,” he said. “Probably because they know I’m a bit of an imposter. I’m just a normal bloke who gets up there and plays.”
When reminded of his previous televised success, including his memorable UK Open triumph, Gilding reflected honestly on the ups and downs of his career. “Who knows?” he said when asked how close he is to rediscovering that form. “I’ve had dips in my form before. Eight or nine years ago I got to a semi-final of the UK Open and then had a big dip, and then I came back again a few years ago. Who knows what’s going to happen?”
His one million dream...but his neighbours don't know
The lure of a second TV title is clear, but one prize in particular stands out above the rest. “This one,” Gilding said. “Anyone would do, but this one would mean a million quid.”
That life-changing figure inevitably prompted thoughts of what he might do with the money. Gilding revealed, with a smile, a very down-to-earth ambition. “I’d like to—well, they don’t know about it—but I’d like to buy next door’s bungalow and expand the garden.” Asked whether his neighbours were aware of the plan, he laughed: “No, of course not. I haven’t got the money to tell them that.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Beyond the humour, Gilding spoke candidly about what financial security would mean to him. “That would be security in my old age,” he said, explaining one of the key reasons he continues to compete. “I was a bit of a late starter, so I didn’t really invest in a pension or anything. I’ve got to keep going, otherwise I’m stuffed, really.”

With every 180 score, Andrew Gilding sticks his thumb in the air
From a performance perspective, Gilding admitted he surprised himself with the numbers he posted against Crabtree. “I just looked at the average and the checkout percentage, and that surprised me,” he said. “Like I keep saying, Cam didn’t play as well as he could. With his form this year, he’s definitely someone I didn’t want to draw.”
Looking back on his 2025 season as a whole, Gilding felt it was stronger than it perhaps appeared at first glance. “Not quite as good as before,” he admitted, “but when I look back on it I got to a European Tour final and the quarter-finals of the Matchplay again, so I can’t really grumble.”
Attention will soon turn to his next opponent, with Chris Dobey or Xiaochen Zong waiting in the wings. Gilding made no secret of who he would relish facing. “I think I owe Chris one,” he said. “I think he’s beaten me quite recently. He’s obviously a hot favourite, so I’d like to beat him.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Expanding on that, Gilding acknowledged Dobey’s status despite their shared major titles. “He was the hot favourite for his first-round game,” he said. “I don’t think I’ve beaten him recently, so I definitely owe him one.”
MVG called me an assassin - Gilding
Asked to reflect on how far the sport has come, Gilding admitted he never imagined playing for such huge sums when he first picked up darts. “No, no,” he said. “When I started playing—15 years ago or something like that—darts wasn’t quite as big. Then Luke Littler came along and suddenly everyone wants to play darts. It’s even surpassed what it was in the 80s.”
While the influx of young talent excites him, Gilding joked that it presents a challenge for the established names. “It’s great for the sport,” he said. “Not so good for us oldies. There are loads of youngsters on the rise now, but it gives us a chance to win a few more quid, so that’s good.”
Despite his popularity with the crowd, Gilding was reluctant to label himself a showman. “I wouldn’t say so,” he insisted. “I don’t thump my chest every time I hit a 180.” Still, his now-famous thumb gesture has become a fan favourite. “I don’t know where the thumb came from,” he said. “It’s just a natural thing. It’s become a thing for me now, so everyone says I should start selling foam thumbs.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Gilding’s reputation within the field is also growing. Asked whether he is now a player others might want to avoid in the draw, he smiled. “I think Michael van Gerwen once called me the assassin,” he said. “So I hope I’m someone that people fear.”
Assessing his current form compared to the player who lifted the UK Open trophy, Gilding was characteristically honest. “I’m always hot and cold,” he said. “At the moment I feel pretty good. I’ve had light duties for the last three weeks since the Players Championship, got some energy back, and things feel like they’re going well.”
The conversation ended on a lighter note, with Gilding once again addressing his ‘Goldfinger’ nickname and long-standing wish to walk on to the iconic Bond theme. “That would be fantastic,” he said. “I haven’t lodged anything. Ian White wanted to walk on to Diamonds Are Forever as well. I used to come on to Shirley Bassey at county level, and there’s nothing quite like the horns at the start to get the crowd going. I wish that could happen.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026








