"I’m not down in the dumps. Dimitri is, though, and that’s very understandable" - Mike De Decker supports struggling teammate as World Cup hopes fade
PDC
Belgian came into the event surrounded by caution. Their team made up of Mide de Decker and Dimitri Van den Bergh may seemed like the best on paper and in the rankings, but prior bad form on the oche concerned everyone. While De Decker lived up to the hype, Van de Bergh failed to produce any backup as they lost their opening group match 4-2 to Hong Kong.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was always going to be tricky against a nation like Hong Kong. Boasting Man Lok Leung and Lok Yin Lee proved to be a step ahead of the pair in a very commendable performance. They averaged over 87 and missed just five darts at a double. Belgium averaged slightly more but could only get four darts on the outer ring. While De Decker averaged 106, Van den Bergh languished at a dreadful 66.
Hong Kong strode confidently into a 2-0 lead after a hectic second leg where all four players missed darts to secure the leg. A 14-dart break clinically moved Hong Kong on the edge of glory, but Belgium would muster up an attempted comeback. Hong Kong resisted the pressure and edged through to win and take a huge leap towards qualification. For Belgium, once notoriously a dark horse at the World Cup, their chances have faded massively with a miracle needed to advance.
Van den Bergh not living up to the expectation
De Decker produced a very high level on stage, and was not feeling too down due to that. The same could not be said for his teammate who was very sombre as De Decker described in his press conference.
“I couldn’t do any more,” De Decker stated after the match. “With that average of Dimitri’s, it’s going to be tough. He also picked it up very poorly, which I already suspected and which is logical. Dimitri got away quickly, and that’s not his usual style. There’s little we can do about it. You win with two and you lose with two. I did manage to get through it after the second leg, with consistent 100 or 85 and a few 140s. I thought: ‘If I can keep this up, maybe I can pull Dimitri along.’ However, that wasn’t the case.”
Read also
He could obviously be very satisfied about his own showing, but the former World Grand Prix champion knew that there was work to be done. “Yeah, it doesn't exactly seem to be my thing. But if I look purely at myself, I can be quite satisfied. I’ve recently started playing with shorter points and my darts are just flying really well. The chances I got here – apart from that 90 – also went out. I really hoped to be able to catch Dimitri in my flow, but that didn't happen. Too bad.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Tricky year for both Belgians
De Decker is under pressure at the end of the year with a lot of prize money to defend. He is not hitting his stride and struggling to find his best darts, making early exits seem like the norm.
This has been the case for Van de Bergh for a while now. The two-time major champion has really struggled for any form and momentum, especially on the big stage, and is in real danger of stumbling off the tour if he is unable to find his best darts once more. Already losing the money won from the UK Open, he is in danger.
This pain on stage continued while De Decker shone. However, that is the cruel reality of pairs. One person can drag the team down, and Van den Bergh knew that. “This pretty much sums up my season. Generally speaking, I’m not throwing too badly," he admitted. "I feel that things have been running much better with those shorter points for the past week or two. I feel much more consistency in training—and this was my first tournament with this—and look at my average.
Dimitri van den Bergh could only average 66 in an abkect performance in Frankfurt
ADVERTISEMENT
"For example: Dimitri came to train last Tuesday and in the first fifteen minutes I threw almost ten 170s. Then things are looking good, right? I feel like I threw well here, so I’m not down in the dumps. Dimitri is, though, and that’s very understandable.”
A performance like this does boost 'The Real Deal' in a hope to turn this torrid year around and finally get something going on the oche. “I just feel that the results are coming for me. After a year and a half of searching and frustrations, it’s about time. I feel it. It just needs to come out more consistently; that inconsistency has to go.
Read also
"That I have to perform now? Okay, but if all my ranking money from 2024 disappears, I’ll still be 36th or 37th on the world rankings. So there’s nothing to worry about. This tournament is – despite the result – a boost for now. I have confidence in my throw; it just has to stop being one good match and one bad one. It certainly seems to be on an upward trend.”
Slovenia is the other team in Group B, and a win is mandatory if they are to stand any chance of making it through. Belgium will be up first with nothing but a win good enough. It will be then down to Slovenia pulling off a result against Hong Kong in the evening. If this happens, all the teams will be on three points and leg difference comes into play.
ADVERTISEMENT
Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026