
The World Cup of Darts started on Thursday, but England
won’t play until Saturday in Frankfurt. The first seeds will enter the doubles
competition in the Last 16 and will want to avoid defeat at this stage, as they
did last year. 2025 was an embarrassment for the most successful nation to ever
play in the World Cup of Darts, with the 5 times champions losing in Round Two for the
first time since 2020, their only previous second-round exit coming in the
inaugural 2010 tournament. Phil Taylor and Adrian Lewis dominated this competition,
together winning 4 of the 5 titles, with a runner-up in 2014 being the low
point.
ADVERTISEMENT
Part of that 2012 final, Talor and Lewis went hand in hand as the best
pair and the best two players in the world between 2012 and 2016. After Taylor,
different pairs have tried for England, but only Michael Smith and Luke
Humphries have won the title, winning in 2024. Since then, A story of
runners-up, a semi-final and 2 quarter final runs with Rob Cross appearing in
both, suggesting a tricky campaign for the best darting nation. So, with just
one win since Taylor’s absence after 2016, can the two best darts players in
the world come together and win the 2026 edition?
Read also
England at the World Cup of Darts: A Nation's History
| Year | Pairing | Result |
| 2010 | Phil Taylor and James Wade | Round Two |
| 2012 | Phil Taylor and Adrian Lewis | Winners |
| 2013 | Phil Taylor and Adrian Lewis | Winners |
| 2014 | Phil Taylor and Adrian Lewis | Runners Up |
| 2015 | Phil Taylor and Adrian Lewis | Winners |
| 2016 | Phil Taylor and Adrian Lewis | Winners |
| 2017 | Adrian Lewis and Dave Chisnall | Semi Finals |
| 2018 | Rob Cross and Dave Chisnall | Quarter Finals |
| 2019 | Michael Smith and Rob Cross | Runners Up |
| 2020 | Michael Smith and Rob Cross | Round Two |
| 2021 | James Wade and Dave Chisnall | Semi Finals |
| 2022 | Michael Smith and James Wade | Round Two |
| 2023 | Michael Smith and Rob Cross | Quarter Finals |
| 2024 | Luke Humphries and Michael Smith | Winners |
| 2025 | Luke Littler and Luke Humphries | Round Two |
How Humphries and Smith Won it in 2024
After eight years of pain, England were
granted a relatively easy run to the final in 2024. Beating France in the last
16, 8-3, requiring just an 86.23 average from the World Number 1 and 2, painted
the picture of the tournament. A brace of 8-4 victories followed against
Northern Ireland in the quarter finals, and a contentious match against
Scotland following Peter Wright’s trash talk. In the final, Austria came, and
so did a ton plus average, defeating Austria with ease, 10-6. With a tournament
average of 95.49, England were comfortable and picked the title without
breaking a sweat. Smith opened, Humphries finished; the partnership was
cohesive and effective, allowing for Smith’s explosive scoring and Humphries’
special ton plus averages. Humphries had a checkout percentage of 42.08% in
2024 and came into 2026 with 40.83%. Humphries, during the 2026 Premier League,
had trouble finishing, but found his finishing touch at the O2 when it mattered
most, pushing the Premier League final to a deciding leg. The 2024 blueprint is clear, so can Littler
replace Smith as the aggressor on the throw?

England claimed the title at the World Cup of Darts in 2024
ADVERTISEMENT
Can the Blueprint be Replicated? Littler Vs Smith
Luke Littler is currently the best darts player in the
World. Every major Littler has walked into in 2026, he has picked up the title.
His most beaten player in the finals in 2026 has been Luke Humphries, so how
will his 2026 stats benefit Humphries and England at this World Cup? Smith’s
2024 average was 95.37, and a game built on high scoring, Smith hit 266 180s
from the start of 2024 until the World Cup, with a first 9-dart average of
104.23. This proves that Smith’s power scoring lifted England to another level,
expanding the gap from its competitors. With Littler in 2026, however, his
average is 5.97 points higher than Smith's at 101.34, as he hit 59 more 180s
and boasts a 111.64 first 9 average to triumph over Smith in the same time
frame.
Every metric shows Littler is operating at a
higher level than Smith in 2024. What’s most striking is that his first 3
average, the 3 darts he will throw at the start of every leg for England, sit
at 115.35, 12.06 points higher than an already impressive 103.29 average for
Smith that kickstarted England’s legs. Littler will score more heavily from the
very start, on average, leaving a finish at 9 darts that Humphries will fancy.
This cohesion between Littler’s game and Humphries' game will prove the definitive
factor: 2024 worked because Smith averaged 104 in the first 3 darts; why
wouldn’t 2026 work with Littler averaging 115? In finals, Littler has thrown an
average of 106.01, with a high of 111.67 against his teammate at the O2 last
month. The best aggressor in the World Cup is Scotland, with Gary Anderson
holding a 3-dart average of 107.9. This shows the statistical gap between the
closest enemy of Littler. Littler’s shown up in finals this year for himself.
Can he for England?
Read also
The Upgrade: Why Littler Gives Humphries
More Than Smith Ever Could
ADVERTISEMENT
| Metric | Smith 2024 | Littler 2026 | Difference |
| Average | 95.37 | 101.34 | +5.97 |
| 180s | 266 | 325 | +59 |
| First 9 Average | 104.23 | 111.64 | +7.41 |
| First 3 Average | 103.29 | 115.35 | +12.06 |
The Rivalry Dynamic
Luke Humphries has been the victim of
Littler’s dominance in darts, losing 23 matches in 37 against him. Frequent
Premier League matches, 2 major finals in 2026, are hurting Humphries, as it
hurts with 2 major finals, losing a deciding set at the Masters and a deciding
leg at the Premier League. Humphries loves England. If Luke had beaten him 37
times out of 37, he still wouldn’t turn down playing with him. “No one's going
to turn down playing for England. I would never turn it down in a million
years, no matter how tired I was, how ill I was,” he told Online Darts. 2025
failed through this rivalry that wasn’t addressed. Humphries was world Number
1, with Littler Number 2, and a fierce battle ensued that the World Cup was
shoehorned into. Chemistry failed, and they walked into the Eissporthalle
expecting to win. 2026 is different. “We're fully aware that we're going to be
massive favourites and everyone's going to expect us to win. But I feel like we
have to take away that pressure and just go out and enjoy it," Humphries
told Online Darts. The rivalry still stands, but the flame isn’t as bright.
Committed to the English cause as a team, as the two appear to have grown
closer off the oche, 2026 should supply a team, not two individuals. “Luke and
I are up for it,” Luke Littler told Oche 180. It’s in England’s hands but they
know this. Their darts will show whether that title will be in their hands.

England was beaten by Germany last year
The 2025 Warning and What Must Change
ADVERTISEMENT
2025 can’t happen again for England.
Humiliation, pain and booing. The latter won’t change, especially with Littler
back in Germany. 2025 included booing to levels Littler has become numb to, but
not Humphries. A German crowd backing their nation saw an 8-4 win, with England
averaging a low 93.34. Martin Schindler and Ricardo Pietreczko will represent
Germany this year, but were a different animal last year and proved a great
pairing against England. "Ricardo and Martin, they definitely played a good
game with each other. Luke and I had a few good moments in the game, but we
just didn't really bond on that stage." Littler told Oche 180, showing the
awareness that the 2025 exit, painful as it was, may have been necessary. Both players are averaging over 101
individually in 2026; the ability is not in question. The pair format of course
requires chemistry and communication, with pressure all the different with the
nation’s expectations on your backs. The German loss wasn’t a talent problem;
it was a chemistry problem, and that showed. As a pair, the two Lukes have transcended from rivals to
friends and have respect for each other. Littler hasn’t just had one tournament
representing his country, with the WDF giving him countless opportunities to
wear an England jersey. Therefore, with the PDC lesson learnt, England couldn’t
be more ready to win.
Read also
Frankfurt’s Foregone Conclusion?
First Seeds. Bookies Favourites. Ranked 1 and
2. Everything spells out an England triumph. But that same mistake happened
last year. Closest rivals will come in the form of the Netherlands, with an
in-form Van Gerwen fancied at 11/2 by the bookies, compared to ½ for England. A
combined ranking money of £4,127,500, there really isn’t an excuse for England
losing. No nation in the field on paper has the depth of quality and talent.
The only question that remains is chemistry. Both players are publicly committed
and motivated, but Humphries will know what it takes; this will need to be
shared with Littler. The seeding removes group stage danger, but with even a
fraction of their 2026 individual form, England should blow the field away. For
me, if England win their opening match, the only remaining question is how many
legs they drop along the way.
Ben James is a darts writer at DartsNews.com, covering professional darts with a focus on analysis, player storylines, and match context. He contributes articles on tournaments, player performances, and developments across the PDC calendar.
Ben is currently completing his A Levels in History, Sociology, and Business, with predicted grades of A, A, and A. He also completed an Extended Project Qualification (EPQ), awarded an A grade, titled “To what extent do psychological factors and equipment specifications determine performance in competitive darts?”, reflecting a strong interest in the analytical and psychological aspects of the sport.
He has published early work on platforms such as Medium, including articles on Joe Cullen and Niels Zonneveld, and is developing his experience in sports journalism. Ben is also set to attend a PDC event, building first-hand insight into the professional darts environment.
His interest in darts spans player narratives, match dynamics, scoring strategy, and the mathematical and psychological elements of performance. In his writing, he focuses on clear structure, contextual analysis, and accurate reporting.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026









