"I'm so proud that I've got two majors under my belt" - Dimitri van den Bergh using UK Open win over Luke Humphries as motivation ahead of 2025 World Darts Championship
PDC
Despite taking the second major title of his career at the UK Open earlier this year, Dimitri van den Bergh doesn't head to the 2025 PDC World Darts Championship on the back of the best year. Nevertheless, the ever-positive Belgian is looking to use his Minehead success as motivation ahead of his Ally Pally return.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Funnily enough, when i was playing in that final [against Luke Humphries], I wasn't thinking in that moment that I was playing the world champion and the world number one," Van den Bergh recalls of the UK Open final back in March, in conversation with The Mirror. "I was thinking 'it's first to 11 and whoever gets there first will win the title', and that was on my mind. For me it was just make sure you get that last leg, and if you hit that last double of the game that means you're going to be a major champion, that for me was on my mind. But also my sports psychologist said to me 'if you're going up there in that final, this is your gift from all your hard work. this is not a punishment', so just because of these words, for some reason the pressure just went off my shoulders."
"There was no monkey on my back any more, it was just me going on that stage, having a bit of fun, and then obviously some things happened during the game, like great finishes at the right time, that gave me more belief that this was my tournament and it's going to happen, it's going to be my trophy," the Belgian continues. "If you can have that feeling while you're playing in a major final, it's unreal to have some feelings like that and then afterwards, when you think about it, that it was against the world champion and the world number one. So, for me, i'm so proud that i've got two majors under my belt. it's something i couldn't have dreamt of five years ago."
Van den Bergh posing with the UK Open title
Van den Bergh has been open and honest about his use of a psychologist in order to further his darting ambitions and the 30-year-old is happy with how things are going. "It's definitely a long term thing, because i'm one of them that thinks you need to give someone time to work with you," he explains.
"They say Rome wasn't built in a day, so for me it's always if I try something new I need to give it some time, and then you will know afterwards if it works or not. That's why i went from the first time: 'look, we start in January and the first thing we've got on our calendar that i want to be really good at is the UK Open'," continues Van den Bergh. "We had the motto back then as 'they never saw me coming', and i can't even believe how much it surprised me, because i didn't even see me coming to win the trophy. You want to do well, but winning it was something i didn't see coming myself."
ADVERTISEMENT
As such, the former World Championship semifinalist is returning to the Alexandra Palace full of optimism. "For me, at Ally Pally as well, for some reason it just works fine. I have no idea why but it just clicks," the Belgian previews. "The only pressure that would be extra is me doing it to myself, if I would put myself more under pressure for some reason, but most of the time that's not the case. i'm always at the venue four hours before my game, getting myself ready and prepared, listening to music and listening to the right things that give me that boost of going on that stage and feeling comfortable, feeling ready."
In the second round, Van den Bergh will face off against either William O'Connor or Dylan Slevin on the evening of Sunday, December 22nd.
Read also
Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026