Injury no problem? Luke Humphries hammers Jurjen van der Velde with 108 average, Gerwyn Price and Michael Smith also through
PDCLuke Humphries is through to the Quarter-Finals of the Grand Slam of Darts despite being in pain. He is battling injury but managed to thrash debutant Jurjen van der Velde in a 10-3 win with wins also for Gerwyn Price, Michael Smith and Ricky Evans.
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries managed to average 108.5, hit seven 180's and 10/13 on the doubles despite being injured in what was a spellbinding display and likely put some egg on the face of those who thought perhaps Grand Slam debutant Van der Velde could pull off the upset against the injured 'Cool Hand Luke'.
He romped to the opening five legs without reply as he produced an insane average of 117.42 and 5/6 on the doubles to confound his pain as he seemingly wanted to get off the stage as quick as possible. The 2024 World Youth finalist did have a retort as he got off the mark to claim two out of three legs to sit 8-2 down.
Read also
But the whirlwind of this match meant that these were mere consolations as Humphries hit double 16 for 9-2 and then thumped in double 20 for a 13-darter to conclude it. Beware the injured dart player at your peril.
Follow the Grand Slam of Darts via our live scores!
Follow the Grand Slam of Darts via our live scores!
Gerwyn Price stayed on the charge to a potential fourth Grand Slam title as he ended the charge of Martin Schindler. Only Lukas Wenig and Niko Springer remain German wise and they face each other so only one will be in the Quarter-Finals.
Price landed a 170 checkout en route to seeing off Schindler as he routed through 10-6. Usually a slow starter, he was at te races very early. He raced three legs clear with a 98.2 average and 66% on the doubles at 4-1 up. Schindler won a leg in which he bust 130 before punishing several missed darts at doubles from the Welshman to then close the gap to 6-4.
But Price stopped the rot hitting a 170 checkout and restored a two leg cushion at 7-5. Schindler hit double five for 7-6 down but Price hit a 12-darter which set him on the way as he broke from there to seal it 9-6 on double 18. He held throw from there on double 20 with an 11-darter.
ADVERTISEMENT
Smith's comeback dream continues
Michael Smith has been through the ringer to say the least over the last 18 months but this win perhaps might be one of the most satisfying as he ended the night.
He saw off Chris Dobey 10-9 in a thrilling decider where both missed match dart after dart. 'Hollywood' will be kicking himself but after all the heartbreak and pain, these are the breaks a player like Smith needed and he got it in earnest as he sealed the win to move through to the last eight.
Dobey led early hitting double 20 to hold throw and he broke for 4-2 on double 11 for a 15-darter. He led from there until Smith broke back on double 16 for 5-4. Smith led as he broke again with an 86 checkout at 6-7 and then he held for 6-8.
ADVERTISEMENT
The crazy run began though as Dobey hit double two with Smith unable to hold to go one away. Only to do so with Dobey unable to hit 82 and he made it 9-8 but again Smith couldn't hold and Dobey sent it the distance.
In the decider, it was very much the case that nobody wanted to win the match. Smith left 100 in case Dobey didn't hit 56 and he missed nine match darts as Smith himself was there with a hatful before he finally fell over the line at 10-9.
Read also
Evans produces superb comeback over Woodhouse
Ricky Evans started the night by winning through to his third major ranking final recovering from 8-5 down to edge past Luke Woodhouse in a decider 10-9 with 'Woody' seemingly ready to head through before his charge hit the brakes.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was a below par start from Woodhouse which saw him average 88.4 in the first mini-session and it's Evans who hit the front hitting three 180's and a 93.7 average at 3-2 up.
It was Evans getting the joy more on Woodhouse's throw albeit without a break with both holding throw with Evans the more comfortable of the two. But there was a sting in the tail as Evans couldn't hit a 116 checkout and he left it handy on 56 but Woodhouse did too on double 20 from 138 and he pinned double 20 for a break and a 13-darter. He was sat 5-4 and held to go 6-4 up in the race to ten.
Woodhouse broke again as it looked very likely that he would reach the Quarter-Finals. He hit double four to go 8-5 up. Evans hit a 72 checkout to go 8-6 down and this started the revival as he broke after Woodhouse missed chances to hold and go 9-5 up.
Evans hit double two to go 8-7 down and right at the brink, Evans hit a 57 checkout to make it 9-9 and broke throw to send it suddenly into a decider. Evans hit a 76 checkout to seal the win with Woodhouse way back in a heartbreaking end for the Bewdley ace but one to save for the popular Rapid.
ADVERTISEMENT

Milly ThomsonLive Darts Blogger
Milly Thomson is an aspiring journalist with a deep-rooted passion for a wide range of sports, including football, darts, and cricket. She recently completed her university studies, earning a BA (Hons) in Football Business and Media—a degree that has given her a solid foundation in both the commercial and communications aspects of the sporting world.
Milly combines her academic background with her genuine enthusiasm for sports to produce engaging and insightful coverage across multiple disciplines. Her writing reflects a strong understanding of the games she follows, as well as a keen interest in the stories behind the athletes and events.
As she continues to grow in the field of journalism, Milly is committed to using her voice to inform, entertain, and connect with fellow sports fans. With a clear focus on developing her skills and expanding her portfolio, she is excited to contribute meaningful content to the wider sporting community.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






