ITV retains broadcast rights to PDC Darts with contract signed until 2028 but with considerable shake-up expected
PDC
ITV Sport will remain the home of free-to-air darts until at least 2028. The channel has reached a new agreement with the PDC to broadcast the sport's major tournaments beyond November. Still, 2026 promises to be a new era: Matchroom Media, the media company owned by Barry and Eddie Hearn, will take over full production of the broadcasts - and that will significantly change the face of darts on television.
ADVERTISEMENT
End of current contract
The current contract between the PDC and ITV expires after the Players Championship Finals in Minehead, which take place next month. Under this agreement, ITV broadcasts several major events annually, including the UK Open, the European Darts Championship, the World Series of Darts Finals and the Players Championship Finals.
World Series tournaments around the world - from Bahrain to the Netherlands - are also regular fixtures on the ITV program.
Although it seemed for a while that ITV would lose its position as a darts broadcaster, it now appears that the channel will largely retain the rights. Still, the way broadcasts are made and presented will change dramatically.
Read also
Matchroom takes the reins
From 2026, Matchroom Media, the media company owned by Barry and Eddie Hearn, will be responsible for the full production of all PDC events not under the Sky Sports umbrella. This will give Matchroom control not only of the picture, but also of the presentation, the commentator teams and the overall style of the broadcasts.
ADVERTISEMENT
For the regular ITV team, this marks the end of an era. The production staff and several regular faces of the darts broadcasts were recently informed that their services will no longer be needed after the Players Championship Finals.
Former pro darter Chris Mason has been one of the regular commentators on ITV for many years
One of those trusted voices, Chris Mason, let it be known via social media that it was the end of an era. "One more event to do with the current team before production is put in the safe hands of Matchroom.
"18 years is a long old time to spend with colleagues that have become friends. Darts of course will be staying on ITV Sport but it’s going feel and look very different."
Presenters and commentators such as Dan Dawson, Mark Webster, Mark Wilson and Ali Drew were also still involved this year in broadcasting the World Series of Darts in Bahrain and the Netherlands and likely will be among those involved in the coverage of the new format. Albeit Mason has also worked for PDCTV on European Tour and ProTours so may still be involved.
ADVERTISEMENT
Matt Porter, Chief Executive of the PDC spoke of their delight amid the signing of the new deal. "We are delighted to continue our long-standing relationship with ITV, with the new deal set to take our partnership beyond 20 years."With more buzz around darts than ever before, we are pleased to be able to deliver free-to-air coverage of so many of our popular events to UK fans."
While Niall Sloane, Director of Sport for ITV was pleased to confirm their stay and their relationship with the PDC. "We are pleased to expand and extend our live darts coverage here at ITV Sport, as we look to keep the biggest events in professional darts free-to-air for the UK audience to enjoy.
"We have a great relationship with the Professional Darts Corporation (PDC) and look forward to continuing our work with them into 2028."
Barry Hearn: 'The future is digital'
Matchroom president Barry Hearn spoke openly earlier this year about his vision for the future of sports broadcasting. According to him, the media landscape is in the midst of change and the dart world must adapt to new generations of viewers. "We live in a numbers game. ITV4 has been fantastically successful for us in the numbers it’s got. We need to be more encouraging to the younger market, which involves talking to them in the language that they understand and the medium that they understand.
ADVERTISEMENT
“And that’s why the world is becoming more digital. The future is more Netflix than free-to-air. It’s going to involve a multiple number of broadcasters. Some free-to-air, some behind the pay-model.
“People will be able to watch what they want to watch, the sports they want to watch, when they want to watch it and for a price they can afford. I find that really exciting.”

Barry and son Eddie Hearn
Despite ITV largely retaining, it could see the rights shared. In May, the British press reported that Channel 5 would be in advanced talks about securing some broadcast rights that became available. Whether those negotiations led to a concrete deal is unclear at this time. It could be that some events will soon be split between multiple channels, something that fits with Hearn's vision of a "multi-platform" approach.
A new chapter for darts on television
ADVERTISEMENT
What is certain: darts on ITV will remain, but in a whole new format. Matchroom is known for its modern, dynamic productions with a strong focus on digital content, social media and international streaming. For viewers, that likely means a fresh, contemporary look - but also the farewell of some familiar faces who for years became household names.
So after 18 years, a familiar formula is coming to an end, but it seems only the beginning of a new chapter in the meteoric growth of the PDC. One thing is certain: the darts will continue to fly - only the stage where we see them will look a lot different starting in 2026.
The Players Championship Finals will be the final chapter but also a dawning of a new era as ITV have managed to stave off competition to keep the rights.

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 10visitors 9
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026






