Luke Woodhouse averages over 110 in stunning victory over Dave Chisnall as Peter Wright suffers another early Euro Tour exit in Swiss darts Trophy
PDC
It is a hugely important weekend for many darters at the Swiss
Darts Trophy, with the cut-off for the World Grand Prix occurring right
after the conclusion of the event. With the pressure on, Dave Chisnall, Peter Wright
and William O’Connor failed to deliver.
ADVERTISEMENT
Chisnall was blown away by a ruthless Luke Woodhouse, who
not only recorded a tournament record average, but his personal best. Woody
began with back-to-back 13 darters, before hitting a 12-darter with a 121
checkout on the bull to go 3-1 ahead. Two consecutive 14-darters bumped his
average to around 114. He then sealed the victory with a scintillating 160
checkout. His average climaxed at a massive 110.69.
For Chizzy, it is his ninth European Tour defeat in a row,
and eighth consecutive second-round exit. He will go into the final Euro Tour
event in Hildesheim outside the top 32. More worryingly, if Martin Schindler
wins his match against fellow German Ricardo Pietreczko, Chisnall will not
qualify for the Grand Prix.
Wright is also looking behind his back after a comprehensive
defeat against Cor Dekker. The tall Norwegian went double-double on tops on the
way to a 3-0 lead, before Snakebite found a similar checkout involving tops and
double 18 to get back into the match. The match stayed on throw up until
5-2 to Dekker, when he had chances to win. Like Amsterdam a few weeks ago, he
failed to take his doubles, as the two-time World Champion prolonged the
seemingly inevitable.
In the end, Dekker clinched victory in the next leg, coming
out on top 6-3. For Wright, the barren spell of average performances continues,
only being able to muster up a woeful 78 average, while missing 14 darts at
double.
It is all over for William O'Connor, who will not make the
journey to Leicester after a 6-3 loss to the Hungarian Darts Trophy finalist
Danny Noppert. The Freeze raced into a 3-0 lead, but was pegged back by the
Irishman, who had woken up with shoulder problems. He shrugged them off and levelled the score at 4-4. It then
went to a last-leg decider, where Noppert sealed victory with an 11 darter.
| Dave Chisnall | VS | Luke Woodhouse |
|---|---|---|
| 97.2 | Average (3 Darts) | 110.69 |
| 10 | 100+ Thrown | 11 |
| 5 | 140+ Thrown | 7 |
| 2 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 64 | Highest Checkout | 160 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 2 |
| 50 | Checkout percentage | 66.7 |
| 2 / 4 | Checkout | 6 / 9 |
Ratajski and Cross march towards European Championships
ADVERTISEMENT
It was a hugely important result for Krzysztof Ratajski, who pipped Mike De Decker in a last-leg decider. The Belgian missed three match darts at double 16 after winning four legs on the bounce. The Polish Eagle clinically took out 107 on the same target and wrapped up a key victory in his European Championship ambitions. He now rises to 31st in the order of merit, £4,000 ahead of Chisnall with the chance to earn more.
Soon after, he was knocked down to 32nd after Rob Cross over took him with a commanding 6-2 win over Richard Veenstra. Voltage averaged 10 more points than his opponent, and won the last five legs to send him through to tomorrow's action.
At the start of the session, Ryan Searle dashing any faint hope in Niels Zonneveld qualifying for the Grand Prix. The Englishman won 6-3, despite his opponent averaging 109 halfway through the match. He pinned two ton+ checkouts, including a key 136 outshot, while boasting a 60% checkout rate.
It was a bit more one-sided in the all Dutch clash between Gian van Veen and Dirk van Duijvenbode, where van Veen cruised to a 6-0 victory over his fellow countryman, racking up his first victory against him. The Giant reeled in the big fish along the way, and averaged over 102 in a phenomenal showing.
The last match of the day was supposed to be a huge tie for Ritchie Edhouse, who would face Ross Smith. Unfortunately for Smudger, he had to leave the tournament on personal reasons, giving a bye for Edhouse into the next round.
ADVERTISEMENT
| Mike De Decker | VS | Krzysztof Ratajski |
|---|---|---|
| 97.36 | Average (3 Darts) | 94.03 |
| 12 | 100+ Thrown | 19 |
| 8 | 140+ Thrown | 4 |
| 5 | 180 Thrown | 1 |
| 110 | Highest Checkout | 107 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 23.8 | Checkout percentage | 50 |
| 5 / 21 | Checkout | 6 / 12 |
Read also

Milly ThomsonLive Darts Blogger
Milly Thomson is an aspiring journalist with a deep-rooted passion for a wide range of sports, including football, darts, and cricket. She recently completed her university studies, earning a BA (Hons) in Football Business and Media—a degree that has given her a solid foundation in both the commercial and communications aspects of the sporting world.
Milly combines her academic background with her genuine enthusiasm for sports to produce engaging and insightful coverage across multiple disciplines. Her writing reflects a strong understanding of the games she follows, as well as a keen interest in the stories behind the athletes and events.
As she continues to grow in the field of journalism, Milly is committed to using her voice to inform, entertain, and connect with fellow sports fans. With a clear focus on developing her skills and expanding her portfolio, she is excited to contribute meaningful content to the wider sporting community.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







