Winmau World Masters Round-up | Littler and Humphries breeze to whitewash wins as van Veen and Price complete semi-final lineup
PDC
It was a walk in the park for Luke Littler in the quarter-finals of the Winmau World Masters, as he wasted no
time in dumping out an average Josh Rock 4-0 in a highly anticipated matchup on
the Marshall Arena stage.
ADVERTISEMENT
Rock has a tendency of flying out of the blocks against the
world number one, but that was not to the case in this scenario. It was a
stroll in the park for Littler in the first set. Rock’s level nowhere near the
standards fans are accustomed to early on, averaging in the low 90’s. After
Littler won a third leg on the spin, Rock overcame numerous missed attempts on
double 16 to finally get his first leg, but a clinical 121 from Littler saw the
world champion move halfway from a first World Masters semi-final.
The stray darts continued to fly in for Rock, who was
punished with a 180 from Littler, setting him up on 65 which the 19-year-old
takes out in two. He hits five perfect darts before seeing out the set on tops
after Rock missed the bull with an unconvincing attempt.
‘The Nuke’ was defeated last year in the quarter-finals to
eventual runner-up Jonny Clayton while averaging over 108. It was a lot easier
this time around, finishing with a 105 average as Rock came nowhere his usual level.
He was not missing at tops as he finished up the match in just over 12 minutes to
make it into a first World Masters semi-final in his second appearance.
| Luke Littler | VS | Josh Rock |
|---|---|---|
| 105.92 | Average (3 Darts) | 94.1 |
| 8 | 100+ Thrown | 9 |
| 5 | 140+ Thrown | 6 |
| 8 | 180 Thrown | 3 |
| 121 | Highest Checkout | 32 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 50 | Checkout percentage | 16.7 |
| 8 / 16 | Checkout | 1 / 6 |
Humphries breezes into semi-finals
The reigning champion Luke Humphries continues to show his strong title credentials. His maximum hitting sky-rocketed in a decisive display against Danny Noppert, winning 4-0.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries blew away Noppert in the early stages of the
match. He went out in 14 darts to hold before almost repeating the events of yesterday,
going six into the perfect leg before plonking a dart in the middle of the
treble one bed, ending those fleeting dreams. He saw it out on double 19 to
sprint in front. He then punished missed doubles from ‘The freeze’ to break but
was broken back instantly by a brilliant 106 outshot. He had a chance to see
the set out but a dart at tops was dragged low. No such problem for Humphries
who launched his last dart in hand right in the middle of the double 16 bed to sail
further out in front.
Noppert went one better into the perfect leg, nailing seven treble 20's before being unable to find the 57 to set him on his way to a first nine darter on the big stage. Despite this flying start, Humphries brutally nabbed the set off him before almost delivering another sucker punch with a 160, narrowly missing tops. He still managed to claim the set thanks to sloppy darts from Noppert on double 18 and nine.
The former UK Open champion was not going to give up without a fight. He halted his doubling woes with a first time effort at tops, but it would prolong in the next two legs. He almost got away with it if not for a clutch effort on double five as Humphries moves closer to another semi-final. He then sealed the win on double six, with revenge against a familiar foe on the cards later today.
| Luke Humphries | VS | Danny Noppert |
|---|---|---|
| 101.67 | Average (3 Darts) | 97.63 |
| 12 | 100+ Thrown | 13 |
| 9 | 140+ Thrown | 5 |
| 5 | 180 Thrown | 6 |
| 98 | Highest Checkout | 106 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 40 | Checkout percentage | 14.3 |
| 8 / 20 | Checkout | 2 / 14 |
Clinical van Veen betters Wade
ADVERTISEMENT
Gian van Veen took James Wade’s comments about the young
players personally after he put an incredible performance in to fend off a
tricky customer 4-2.
Van Veen was the faster out of the blocks. He hit a 180 to
leave 44 before clinically taking it out for an 11-darter and more importantly
a break. This allowed him to motor away and seal the first set in commanding
fashion. Despite this, Wade responded instantly. Some erratic darts at double
from the Dutchman allowed Wade to capitalise, before a 110 outshot on tops saw ‘The
Machine’ bring proceedings level.
Gian van Veen is into the Winmau World Masters semi-finals for the first time
It was an instant reply from van Veen, who in a bit of Déjà
vu found an 11-dart break of throw, this time on double 15. It was an almost
carbon copy of the first set, again nailing double 16 for a 15-darter to take
the third set and the lead. He then went seven into the perfect leg, narrowly
missing an eighth treble to get him to a double. He then took out 70 in two, and
the quarter-final was again level.
The darts in the match was of the upmost quality. At this
point both players were averaging 107. Van Veen kept up this world class darts
with a third 11-dart break of throw. For the first time in the match, the set
was not sealed two legs with the 2014 champion breaking to force a decider.
Despite the Englishman throwing for it, van Veen raced ahead and got it done on
tops. After Wade missed two at double 18, ‘The Giant’ got just one dart at
tops, which he pinned with perfection to annoy Wade and move him closer to the semi-final.
More squandered doubles from Wade allowed the recent World Championship
runner-up to finish him off. Humphries is his next task as he looks to continue his imperious form over the former world number one.
ADVERTISEMENT
| Gian van Veen | VS | James Wade |
|---|---|---|
| 102.66 | Average (3 Darts) | 103.68 |
| 11 | 100+ Thrown | 18 |
| 11 | 140+ Thrown | 9 |
| 5 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 90 | Highest Checkout | 110 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 72.7 | Checkout percentage | 45.5 |
| 8 / 11 | Checkout | 5 / 11 |
Price powers past Dobey
Gerwyn Price was not satisfied with his showing in Milton
Keynes but was still good enough to take down Chris Dobey 4-2, who would pay
dearly for costly double misses.
Read also
Price found little joy on his favourite double 20 in the
first couple of sets. He missed it which allowed Dobey to hit the target before
Price broke straight back to level up. He was now throwing for the set but missed
another double at the top of the top. Just before, Dobey had missed the bull
for a 132 but pinned double 16 for the first set. The breaks continued
throughout the match as Price takes out 72 but a fifth consecutive break from
Dobey tied it at 1-1. The Englishman had a dart for the set but once more
missed the bull, this time for a 170 checkout. Price finally pinned tops,
letting out a huge roar with the match level.
ADVERTISEMENT
The third set saw the holds dominate. Price would benefit
with him throwing first and was forced to see it out after Dobey eventually got
over the line on double eight. The Iceman takes out 90 in three darts to take
the lead. Dobey had another chance at the 170 but again missed the bull, this
time a lot closer. Price was there to capitalise, taking out the first ton+
outshot of the match in the form of a 116 to claim a two-set cushion.
He was looking to see it out with no queries, but Dobey was
not going to let him do that. After Dobey missed another key dart at the bull,
73 went for Price who moved within one of the match. However, the 2023 champion
was able to claw his way back, finding a composed dart at double 20 to keep his
title ambitions afloat. It would be premature as Price won the next two legs to
secure a spot in the semi-finals for the first time since 2021. It was a frustrated
Welshman at the end who was not fully satisfied with his showing. He will be
wanting to be better when clashing against Littler tonight.
| Chris Dobey | VS | Gerwyn Price |
|---|---|---|
| 96.2 | Average (3 Darts) | 96.95 |
| 18 | 100+ Thrown | 23 |
| 11 | 140+ Thrown | 12 |
| 4 | 180 Thrown | 1 |
| 78 | Highest Checkout | 116 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 33.3 | Checkout percentage | 58.8 |
| 6 / 18 | Checkout | 10 / 17 |

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 1visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







