European Championship Round-Up | Luke Humphries knocks out James Wade as trio of Dutch stars make up semi-final spots
PDCLuke Humphries was dominant in his 10-3 win over James Wade
in the quarter-final of the European Championship, with him joining a trio of
Dutchman in tonight’s semi-finals. The former world number one racked off eight legs in a row to
dispose of Wade.
ADVERTISEMENT
It was a sluggish start for Wade, but he still went ahead
thanks to Humphries missing five on the outer ring. Cool Hand Luke would win two
legs to take the lead, but Wade fought back immediately with two legs of his own.
The world number one came out in the second session a different
man, sweeping up all five legs to race into a 7-3 lead. He was not at his best,
with missed doubles going unpunished by The Machine. He won the remaining three
legs to secure his spot in the semi-finals, with a 121 checkout on double 18
the highlight of those checkouts. Humphries will continue as the number one for
at least another competition, with the hopes of winning a major he has never won
still on the cards.
| James Wade | VS | Luke Humphries |
|---|---|---|
| 92.61 | Average (3 Darts) | 100.82 |
| 22 | 100+ Thrown | 20 |
| 10 | 140+ Thrown | 14 |
| 1 | 180 Thrown | 4 |
| 61 | Highest Checkout | 121 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 2 |
| 37.5 | Checkout percentage | 35.7 |
| 3 / 8 | Checkout | 10 / 28 |
Mighty Mike defies Super Chin
Michael van Gerwen got the better of Daryl Gurney 10-5 to
keep him enroute for a fifth European Championship title. The tie was started
with two 13-dart breaks of throws, with Gurney squandering three darts at
double 16 to claim his advantage back. Van Gerwen punished him, and once again
survived another missed opportunity from Gurney who missed the bull for a 130
checkout at the end of the first session.
The breaks continued, with three consecutive legs against
the throw beginning with a sublime 124 outshot from The Green Machine. This was
finished by another ton+ checkout, this time a 120 from van Gerwen to put him
6-3 ahead. He was pegged back by a ton+ from Gurney, as he pinned the bull for
a statement 127 checkout. This was upstaged in the next leg by the four-time
champion, who took out 134 to prolong the holds. Gurney came close to extending
the ton+ checkouts but missed tops for a 120 before cleaning up to make the
score 7-5.
ADVERTISEMENT
From here it was just routine hold of throws, with either opponent
unable to make any headway when not throwing first. This would be a disaster
for Gurney, who would be able to get back into the match, allowing van Gerwen
to casually wrap up the match on double eight. He is set to play in his seventh
European Championship semi-final.
| Michael Van Gerwen | VS | Daryl Gurney |
|---|---|---|
| 99.57 | Average (3 Darts) | 96.61 |
| 21 | 100+ Thrown | 27 |
| 11 | 140+ Thrown | 10 |
| 4 | 180 Thrown | 2 |
| 134 | Highest Checkout | 127 |
| 3 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 55.6 | Checkout percentage | 36.8 |
| 10 / 18 | Checkout | 7 / 19 |
Van Veen continues to impress
Gian van Veen has been one of the standout players in Dortmund
and continued his progress with a convincing 10-5 victory over debutant Ryan
Joyce. Early missed doubles at tops from Joyce allowed van Veen to snatch a
break. He followed that with another 14-darter, then found the triple 20 seven times
on the bounce to get the German crowd on their feet but could not find the rare
perfect leg. Two missed big numbers allowed Joyce to clinically take out 107 to
get his first leg on the board. He should have made it 3-2 on that same target,
but his missed opportunity allowed van Veen to race 4-1 ahead.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
After falling four legs behind, Joyce wone three consecutive
legs to get back in it, but a crucial hold from van Veen prevented the match from
going level. At this point, Joyce was 15 points behind in the averages but was
only two legs behind thanks to his superb finishing. Two legs at the start of
the third session saw van Veen take further command in the tie, before another
two-leg spurt culminated the match, putting him through to his second European
Championship semi-final.
| Ryan Joyce | VS | Gian van Veen |
|---|---|---|
| 90.76 | Average (3 Darts) | 101.4 |
| 18 | 100+ Thrown | 21 |
| 5 | 140+ Thrown | 9 |
| 2 | 180 Thrown | 7 |
| 107 | Highest Checkout | 96 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 35.7 | Checkout percentage | 47.6 |
| 5 / 14 | Checkout | 10 / 21 |
Noppert sees off Pietreczko
Danny Noppert saw off home-favourite Ricardo Pietreczko 10-5
to reach a fourth major final in 2025, and third in the European Championship. Noppert
took control from the start, going ahead in the first leg after missing a
number of doubles. Pietreczko levelled up before Noppert won three on the spin,
including a clinical 130 checkout on the bull. Pietreczko came out in the
second session much more competitive. After going 5-1 down, he won two legs
while keeping his 100% checkout rate.
ADVERTISEMENT
Numerous holds followed, with Noppert struggling to consistently
put the leg away, while the German stuck with him. This same pattern occurred
until the penultimate leg of the match, where a number of missed doubles from
most players made for a nervous ending. Noppert eventually found double five to
clinch an important break to go 9-5 ahead before comfortably seeing the match
out to join his fellow countrymen in the semi-finals in Dortmund.
| Danny Noppert | VS | Ricardo Pietreczko |
|---|---|---|
| 95.22 | Average (3 Darts) | 90.29 |
| 16 | 100+ Thrown | 24 |
| 18 | 140+ Thrown | 12 |
| 2 | 180 Thrown | 2 |
| 130 | Highest Checkout | 60 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 29.4 | Checkout percentage | 29.4 |
| 10 / 34 | Checkout | 5 / 17 |

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 11visitors 1
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







