Red-hot Luke Littler averages 115 to seal back-to-back World Series titles at New Zealand Darts Masters
PDCLuke Littler is on a different darting planet right now with 'The Nuke' going into orbit with a 115 average as he took down Luke Humphries 8-4 to seal his second World Series of Darts title in the space of seven days.
ADVERTISEMENT
Littler mooted that he wouldn't return to Australia and New Zealand next year so he is making up for the lost time as he ends a superb run. Often jibed for not winning or playing too much this year, he has silenced the doubters by winning the World Matchplay and both World Series crowns.
The same can be said for Luke Humphries even in defeat who has received criticism and has been down on his own displays but a final run shows he is very much still in business apart from running into the wall that is Littler today. Littler sealed the title with seven 180's and 50% on the doubles. Not bad for a player who didn't hit a 180 at all in his opener yesterday.
Quarter-Finals - Dobey and Bunting hit the stratosphere
To start the session, it was the Dobey and Bunting show as Dobey narrowly sealed the win over the top seed albeit the darts on show were out of this world as Dobey averaged 110 and Bunting averaged 108. A first time on the World Series in the Oceanic double that both players had averaged 108.
Read also
This featured three 180’s from Dobey, a spell binding 167 and one of the best games all year on the World Series. Dobey started superbly anyway going 2-0 up pinning a 112 checkout. Bunting cut the gap with an 11-dart 92 checkout.
But despite averaging close to 110. Dobey produced an epic 167 checkout to make it 4-1. Dobey hit double 20 to make it 5-2 and while Bunting hit 130 to make it 5-3. He missed 112 to stay in it and Dobey hit double 19 to seal it.
ADVERTISEMENT
| Stephen Bunting | VS | Chris Dobey |
|---|---|---|
| 108 | Average (3 Darts) | 110.36 |
| 9 | 100+ Thrown | 6 |
| 7 | 140+ Thrown | 7 |
| 3 | 180 Thrown | 3 |
| 130 | Highest Checkout | 167 |
| 1 | Checkout 100+ | 2 |
| 60 | Checkout percentage | 66.7 |
| 3 / 5 | Checkout | 6 / 9 |
Then it was the turn of Humphries and Heta. ‘Cool Hand Luke’ sealed an opening break and Heta missed darts to hold and Humphries pounced consolidating for 2-0 with an 84 checkout. Humphries missed the bull for a 170 but returned for 25 for 3-0. Heta broke back but couldn’t find a way to extend it as Humphries missed 103 for 5-1 but he was eventually back to make it one away. He hit double 16 to make it 5-2 albeit Humphries held throw to make it 6-2.
Then it was the turn of Gerwyn Price and Luke Littler to win through to the semi-finals. Starting with the Iceman who battled past Josh Rock in a superb comeback win. Rock hit a 180 to leave double 11 and he got a go with Price unable to hit 101. 'Rocky' struck first to break for 1-0.
Rock continued his rampant start and missed the bull for an 84 checkout. Price couldn't get near 132 and Rock made it 2-0. Price finally got on the board at 2-1 down. Rock set up double 16 off 121 and pinned double eight eventually for 3-1. Price sat on 147 for a nine-dart finish. He couldn't hit it and Rock looked at 121. A lapse of concentration saw Rock not even get a shot after hitting a treble. Price hit double 20 for a level game. Price hit two double 20's for an epic 137. Price hit double 11 for a 79 checkout and was suddenly one away.
Gerwyn Price surged past Josh Rock before falling to Littler.
Rock broke back with a 54 checkout and Rock sent it all the way. But an incredible leg saw Price snare it. Price went into treble one going for 170 but would return for 47. He missed two darts for the match and Rock looked at 101 but he missed double 12. Price returned for double 10.
ADVERTISEMENT
A match with Littler loomed if he get past Mike de Decker and that he did. De Decker opened with an 88 checkout for a break. Littler hit back with a 41 checkout and held for 2-1. He also finally hit his first maximum. Littler started to motor. He pinned a 100 checkout for 3-1 and was half way to the finish throwing for 4-1. De Decker broke back with a 65 checkout to make it 3-2 but Littler came back and went one away. That he sealed as De Decker missed dart after dart to hold throw and Littler claimed it.
Read also
Semi-Finals - Price hits the wall as Humphries battles past Dobey
Prior to setting up that final, we had Luke Humphries facing off against Chris Dobey in the first semi-final of the evening. After Dobey’s heroics we might have expected the same again but in the end, it was a pretty one sided win for Luke Humphries who managed to produce his best yet over the World Series double header.
He averaged 102 with seven 180’s and 7/14 on the doubles to see off ‘Hollywood’. Humphries led early doors breaking throw and holding on double 10 for 2-0. He broke again in the race to seven with Dobey missing his chance to hold and gain a foothold in the tie as he was still getting beaten to nil. Humphries was averaging well in excess of 109. Humphries hit 60 to break back after Dobey finally claimed a leg and he did it in some style with a 60 checkout. Dobey reduced the arrears to 5-2 but missed a dart at double 20 for 5-3. Humphries returned to get a dart at double 20 off 77 and made no mistake to go one away. Humphries messed around completing the job and Dobey looked at 150 and pinned double 18 for 6-3. Dobey broke with a 68 checkout but his swansong wouldn’t last long as Humphries broke to seal the win.
ADVERTISEMENT
While onto the second semi-final as Luke Littler faced Gerwyn Price in a hotly anticipated tie. He was dominant over Price who averaged 103 and still lost 7-2. Littler hit a 108.8 average, five 180’s and a high checkout of 140.
He broke to start the tie with an 11-dart 56 checkout. He held from there on double 15. The difference was in fact the early break for Littler as Price managed to hold but he couldn’t break. Littler could break though and did so twice in a row. He hit a 140 checkout to make it 5-2 and then held on double four for 6-2.
Littler sealed the deal from there on double 20 for an 11-darter, truly spellbinding from the 18-year-old as he aims to make it back-to-back.
| Gerwyn Price | VS | Luke Littler |
|---|---|---|
| 103.03 | Average (3 Darts) | 108.81 |
| 8 | 100+ Thrown | 8 |
| 6 | 140+ Thrown | 7 |
| 4 | 180 Thrown | 5 |
| 40 | Highest Checkout | 140 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 1 |
| 50 | Checkout percentage | 53.8 |
| 2 / 4 | Checkout | 7 / 13 |
Final - Littler goes back-to-back
ADVERTISEMENT
Then Littler sealed the title in superb style seeing off Luke Humphries 8-4 to bookend an incredible month that saw him crowned the World Matchplay champion as well as winning both World Series.
Littler hit double 20 for a 13-darter to open up the race to eight. Littler held throw on double 16 and with Humphries missing double 20 for a 100 checkout, 'The Nuke' sprung into life pinning double 20 for 3-0. Littler missed darts to hold throw and this time was punished as Humphries left 41 and took it out for 3-1 down. He was on the board and throwing for 3-2 down. Humphries held for 3-2 down but Littler has surged ahead again hitting an 83 checkout on double eight to go half way to the finish.
Humphries missed 81 for a hold after the break and Littler had another break to go 5-2 up. He went three away. This proved vital as Littler went one away. After seven perfect darts, Littler hit 41 to go 7-3 up. Humphries hit back with an 11-darter to hold on double 16 but Littler was throwing for it. Littler sealed the title with an 11-darter himself pinning 81 to seal the win.
Read also
| Luke Humphries | VS | Luke Littler |
|---|---|---|
| 102.31 | Average (3 Darts) | 115.02 |
| 14 | 100+ Thrown | 12 |
| 9 | 140+ Thrown | 13 |
| 3 | 180 Thrown | 7 |
| 44 | Highest Checkout | 83 |
| 0 | Checkout 100+ | 0 |
| 44.4 | Checkout percentage | 50 |
| 4 / 9 | Checkout | 8 / 16 |
ADVERTISEMENT

Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026







