Revolutionary idea for the Premier League Darts: Could a player choose their own opponent in the future?
PDC
The PDC continues to grow in popularity, but chief executive Matt Porter knows success is never guaranteed. In an in-depth conversation with Online Darts, he spoke candidly about new TV deals, the future of iconic tournaments such as the World Matchplay, and the importance of storytelling around players.
ADVERTISEMENT
The current ITV deal runs out at the end of this year, but Porter was quick to reassure fans that an announcement is imminent. “By the end of this month we should have something ready to announce,” he said. “It’s really only the summer that’s delayed things. Summer’s difficult because people go on holiday and it slows everything down. But yes, by the end of September we should have something ready.”
For British darts fans, the good news is that the relevant tournaments will remain free-to-air, keeping the sport accessible to a wide audience. The partnership with Butlins – the long-time home of the UK Open and Players Championship Finals – is also up for renewal. “That’s still in process,” Porter explained. “We want to stay at Butlins, it’s a great venue. The fans love it there, we love going there. We’ll get it done.”
Read also
World Matchplay belongs in Blackpool
This year’s World Matchplay was widely hailed as the best ever. But speculation sometimes surfaces about a possible move away from Blackpool. Porter is crystal clear on the subject.“I think there are some events that are in a growth phase, and some that are established. Once something’s established, then you have to ask whether you’re moving it for the right reasons. The World Matchplay is so synonymous with Blackpool and that beautiful room is part of it,” he said.
Since taking on his role in 2007, Porter insists the question of moving has never seriously been raised. “It’s never been a conversation. I don’t think we’ve ever had a conversation about taking the World Matchplay anywhere else.”

For years, the Winter Gardens in Blackpool has been inextricably linked to the World Matchplay
ADVERTISEMENT
Top 16 not guaranteed automatic entry into majors
Among fans and on social media there’s regular debate about the position of the world’s top 16, with some accusing the PDC of giving them too much protection. Porter was asked whether those players could eventually be guaranteed entry into all of the ranked majors.
“The top 16 are in most things anyway,” he said. “But you’ve got to be careful. If you do that and it’s just the same top 16 forever, it becomes boring. We sometimes get accused of protectionism, but we still feel we’ve got enough open doors for players outside the top 16. Guaranteeing them everything would be a step too far.”
He pointed to the qualification race for the TV tournaments in Minehead as an example of added tension. “That’s the balancing act, isn’t it? Top players can’t realistically play all 34 Players Championship events. Do you go hard early, play the first six or eight and bank your money, then pick and choose? If you don’t get the money in early, then you’re chasing and panicking, and you’ve missed some because of holidays, so you’re playing catch up. It’s tricky, but 34 events across the year is plenty of opportunity for everyone to qualify.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Players as brands: the power of storytelling
Porter is clear that the PDC is about more than just staging tournaments – it’s also about telling stories.“Everybody knows the Luke Littler story, the Luke Humphries story, the Michael van Gerwen story. But do people know the Josh Rock story, or the Jan van Veen story, or the Martin Schindler story, or the Ross Smith story? Players who aren’t the headline makers now could be the headline makers of tomorrow, so it’s better if people already know who they are.”
While short, snackable clips dominate today’s digital world, Porter stressed there is still room for long-form features.“We need to get players aware of the need for themselves to become brands,” he said.
He cites Scott Williams as an example. "I saw a TalkSport interview with him – 20 questions in a pub. Scott is a little bit Marmite, but fair play, he’s articulate, he’s got personality, he’s got presence on stage. He doesn’t care if you like him or hate him, he just wants to be on the stage. That’s knowing your brand.”
Stephen Bunting also drew praise. “Stephen Bunting’s done a really good job on social media, being relatable to people. If you’re a player just outside that top bracket, what can you do to build your brand so people know who you are? What’s your point of differentiation? If we can help bring that story out, it sets you up better for when you reach the next level, whether that’s the Premier League or winning trophies.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Alongside player development, the PDC is also working on a major digital upgrade. “We tend to use YouTube for a lot of our archive, which is free for people. But we are relaunching PDC TV, relaunching our website and our app. It’ll all come under one big ecosystem, either at the end of this year or the start of next. It’ll be a much-improved product with new providers, and an exciting destination for darts fans.”
Radical Premier League idea
The interview closed with a bold proposal for the Premier League. Currently in Weeks 9 and 16 the fixtures are set by rankings – first plays eighth, second plays seventh, and so on. The suggestion was to let the league leader choose their opponent live on YouTube or Sky, creating a draft-style drama.
Porter smiled at the idea. “From a purely storytelling perspective, that’s a great idea. I don’t know. Would the players go for it?”
ADVERTISEMENT
The interviewer pushed the scenario. If Luke Littler was top, he might pass on playing bottom-placed Bunting and instead choose Michael van Gerwen or Nathan Aspinall – knowing he often beats Aspinall. Likewise, Aspinall might pick Chris Dobey because of a favourable record. The drama would be instant.
Porter refused to dismiss it outright. “Between now and the end of the year, when you interview a player who you think will or might be in the Premier League, ask them what they think of that idea, and I’ll watch the answers, and then we’ll see where we go.”
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







