"Second in the table... call it off now!" - Gian van Veen makes immediate impact with final run on Premier League Darts debut
PDCFor Gian van Veen, it was a night he won’t soon forget. His very first Premier League Darts appearance immediately ended with a spot in the final and three valuable points on the board.
ADVERTISEMENT
And that while he’s the first to admit that, technically speaking, the performance was far from perfect. That’s precisely what might make this opening night all the more telling for the young Dutchman.
“It was quite positive,” Van Veen reflected honestly to Viaplay. “I wasn’t good tonight. Everyone saw that. I wasn’t what I might have expected from myself.”
Those are the words of a player who is critical of his own performance, yet also sees the bigger picture. Because despite patchy scoring and missed doubles, Van Veen still ended the night in the final.
Read also
Not good, yet a final
It sounds almost contradictory: unhappy with your game, yet reaching the final on your Premier League debut. Yet that is exactly what Van Veen experienced. “Scoring-wise it didn’t quite click,” he admitted. “But if you still make the final, well, that’s simply a decent night.”
The interviewer noticed that too. On a night when you’d think you need to be at your absolute best, Van Veen clearly wasn’t. And still he won matches. “That’s nice as well,” he said with a smile. “It gives you confidence that it can happen even when you’re not at your best.”
ADVERTISEMENT
That feeling may be more important than a high average or a spectacular checkout. Knowing that you can survive on off-days at the very highest level is a crucial step in any elite athlete’s development.
Surviving rather than dominating
In his first matches, Van Veen visibly had to battle. Doubles were missed, legs took longer than desired, but time and again he fought his way back. “Even if you’re not at your best, you don’t go out in the first round straight away,” he explained. “That it still happens gives extra confidence for the coming weeks.”
That resilience is no coincidence. Van Veen is known for strong mentality, someone who doesn’t panic easily. That was clear again tonight. In both his first and second matches he let chances slip on the doubles, but he kept believing in himself. Against Michael van Gerwen the story changed.
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Frustration against Van Gerwen
In the final, none other than Michael van Gerwen awaited. For Van Veen, an opponent against whom you always want to show something extra. “I’m really gutted about that,” he said candidly. “Scoring-wise I just wasn’t good against Michael. And of course you want to win a night like this. Especially against Michael. That’s also a match you want to win even more.”
The respect for Van Gerwen is evident, but so is the hunger to beat him. That it didn’t happen this time was accepted without excuses. “It just wasn’t there today. I’m disappointed about that, but hey, that’s part of it.”
That level-headed approach fits Van Veen. No exaggerated disappointment, no frustration towards himself, but acceptance that some nights simply don’t yield the maximum, even if you ‘only’ finish runner-up.
A venue that impresses
ADVERTISEMENT
Beyond the sporting side, there was the experience. The Premier League Darts is known for large arenas, light shows, and an intense atmosphere. For Van Veen, it was all new. “Amazing,” he said with evident enthusiasm. “It’s great to make my debut here. First Premier League night ever, two matches won and a final reached. I’m enjoying that immensely.”
The setting impressed as well. “Such a vast arena… it looks almost as big as Ahoy,” he was told. Van Veen nodded. “It was beautiful. I really enjoyed it.”
That experience is something many players have to get used to. The Premier League is not comparable to a regular ranking event. Everything is bigger, louder, and more intense. The fact that Van Veen seemed to navigate it effortlessly says a lot about his potential.
At the end of the night, Van Veen could also sum it up in numbers. Three points, a final appearance, and an excellent start in the standings. “Three points in the bag,” he said contentedly. “You can take that home.”
With a wink, he even looked ahead. “Second in the table. They can call it off now as far as I’m concerned. On to The O2.” It’s a joke, but telling. Van Veen clearly feels at home in this company and isn’t looking around shyly. He belongs here, and he knows it.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







