“That wasn’t a world number 47... I told him to keep performing like this” – Luke Humphries reveals classy message to Gabriel Clemens following Ally Pally thriller
PDC
Luke Humphries spoke to the press afterwards looking both relieved and proud after coming through one of the most gripping matches of the 2026 PDC World Darts Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
The world class star had just survived a thriller against Gabriel Clemens, a contest that swung back and forth with neither player giving an inch. “Yeah, it was a great contest. It was up and down.”
From the first dart it was clear it would not be a straightforward night for Humphries. After strong openings in his earlier matches, he admitted this time he was searching for his rhythm. “I had a nervy start and it wasn’t at the level I wanted it to be,” he said. “In the last two games I started the first set at a really good standard, and tonight it was nice to get through that first set and then the second set felt a bit more comfortable.”
After a steadier second set, the match began to tilt. Clemens, backed by a vocal German contingent, grew into the game and started producing stretches of relentless scoring and finishing. Humphries said the pressure felt like facing one of the very best in the sport. “Then the onslaught from Gabriel was like playing any top player in the world,” he said. “Every visit it felt like treble, treble, treble and then a finish.”
Read also
No moment to relax
Humphries stressed that, unlike some of his earlier rounds, there was never a point where he felt safe. “There wasn’t a part of that game where I felt comfortable,” he said. “There was no point — even at 3–0 — where I thought I’d won it.”
That sense of danger made his late checkouts even more important. In the closing stages, Humphries produced a key 50 finish and then the 81 to close out the match, and he was clear about the significance of those moments. “For me, that 50 was a really good finish to make sure I ended the game,” he said. “Because if you’re 3–0 up and it goes to 3–3, it can be bleak… So I was really proud of the way I took out the 50 and then the 81.”
ADVERTISEMENT
He also pointed out that the overall checkout percentage is not always the full story in matches like this. “You could have a low checkout percentage overall, but it’s those crucial moments that matter and that people forget,” he said. “I was really proud of the way I took them out.”
Belief and mental strength
Humphries had been asked before the tournament about his stated ambition to win the title, and he repeated the logic behind that mindset. “I said it a little bit in jest, because who comes into a tournament saying they’re going to lose it?” he said. “You say it because if you don’t believe you can win it, you won’t.”
He also explained why matches that ebb and flow can be valuable tests at this stage of the tournament. “When you’re involved in a game that ebbs and flows, you find out what you’re made of,” he said. “When someone’s throwing everything at you, it’s easy to feel like everything is going against you. But I found that level to stay with him.”
Humphries did acknowledge there are still elements he wants to tighten up, particularly in his scoring consistency. “I’d like my scoring to be a bit more consistent,” he said. “At times it’s really good, and at times it’s not so great.” But he singled out one part of his performance as a clear positive. “The thing I was most pleased with tonight was my finishing. That was really good.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Momentum and the business end
With the tournament moving deeper into the schedule, Humphries said he enjoys the rhythm of matches coming quickly after Christmas. “Yeah, I like it this way,” he said. “When they’re coming thick and fast, you get into a rhythm… We’re in the business end of the tournament now, so you have to be on it. If you’re not, you’ll find yourself going home.”
He also felt Clemens played well beyond what his ranking might suggest. “Yeah, that wasn’t a world number 47 playing like that,” Humphries said. “That’s a top 32 player, nearly a top 16 player.”
After the match, Humphries shared a moment with Clemens and explained what he said in the immediate aftermath. “I just said, ‘Great game, Gabriel,’” he said. “In short, I told him to keep doing this, keep performing like this. If he takes something away from tonight, he can get back into the top 32, which is where I think he belongs.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Loud, but respectful crowd
Despite the strong German presence in the arena, Humphries said the atmosphere never crossed a line. “They were hostile, but they weren’t bad. They weren’t disrespectful,” he said. “Tonight they were very respectful. They didn’t try to put me off once.”
He also explained why he showed more emotion than usual during key moments. “People think you’re a robot and you don’t have emotion. Of course you have emotion,” Humphries said. “Every game is different… I celebrated in the third set because it felt like a big moment, and I celebrated at the end because it was a massive moment to win the game.”
Looking back, Humphries placed the match alongside other hard fought wins in his career. “This is one of my favourite games,” he said, “similar to the game against Joe Cullen where it went back and forth. When you win games like that, it feels special.”
And while the title remains the long term aim, Humphries was clear that the next step is always the immediate one. “You can’t worry about anyone but yourself,” he said. “So I focus on myself.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries went on to expand further on how demanding the contest had been, particularly once Clemens began threatening a full comeback.
“There was no moment where I felt free,” he said. “Even when I was ahead, I felt like I had to stay switched on the whole time. He was throwing everything at me.”
He admitted the match reminded him why long, tight battles can be so valuable at a World Championship.
“When you win games like that, it gives you something,” Humphries said. “If you just roll through winning comfortably and then suddenly get tested later on, it can catch you out. Being tested like this stands you in good stead.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT
Handling pressure when it matters most
Asked about the decisive moments late on, Humphries again returned to the importance of timing rather than volume.
“I could have had a really low checkout percentage tonight,” he said. “But the 50 and the 81 were the moments that mattered. Those are the moments people forget when they just look at numbers.”
He also acknowledged the relief when Clemens missed darts to level the match.
“Of course you’re relieved,” Humphries said. “When he misses and you get another chance, you know you have to take it. I was really proud of how I did that.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Perspective beyond this match
Despite the drama, Humphries insisted he does not allow himself to look too far ahead in the draw.
“I watch other matches as a fan, but I don’t worry about what anyone else is doing,” he said. “If I’m worrying about them and not about myself, then I’ll end up going out.”
For now, the takeaway is simple.
“Winning a game like this gives you confidence,” Humphries said. “But it doesn’t give you anything more than the next round. You still have to go again.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026
- Littler lost to crabtree in the youth/junior/whatever you call it. He had no point in being there. He's unfortunately now got to the stage,he feels all he has to do is get on the stage to win. Well,I hope he realises part of his fear factor has gone. Happened to Taylor,then van gerwen,and it's causing him to realise pretty sharp,he isn't unstoppable. It's good for the sport,not 1 single player in my 60 years has ever,or will ever be, unbeatable.rick6725-10-2026
- I think it's great to see Mark Webster looking good,good ladrick6725-10-2026
- I agree,I can't believe the lack of coverage of this sad loss. Always enjoyed watching him,but I guess now it's all about littler,well it seems that way. Darts has sadly lost a good manrick6717-10-2026
- In the absence of a report regarding the death of Stefan Lord, I'll assist. An excellent player in the late 70s and early 80s, he actually won the now defunct 3rd place match at two World Championships and a couple of the News of the World Championships. A fabulous player and easily the best Swedish player ever. Rest peacefully Stefan.richieburnettrocks16-10-2026
- Joking aside, it is the second most watched sport on sky (more than golf, F1 etc) behind football only, and in participation is second to only football and swimming. It doesn't get the attention or sponsorship of "bigger" sports because it's not as sexy, but it's right up there.BandB13-10-2026









