"There’s no ceiling on what he can achieve" – Wayne Mardle full of praise for 'generational talent' Luke Littler
PDC
Luke Littler continues to leave the darts world in awe. The 18-year-old sensation from Warrington added yet another major trophy to his already remarkable collection on Sunday night, cruising to a 6–1 victory over world number one Luke Humphries in the 2025 World Grand Prix final. It marked Littler’s seventh major TV title since his explosive breakout at the 2023 PDC World Darts Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
Former pro turned Sky Sports pundit Wayne Mardle was glowing in his praise for the young superstar, insisting Littler has everything it takes not just to reach world number one, but to dominate darts for years to come. “He’s got it all,” Mardle told Sky Sports. “We all know he’s got it all. He knows he’s got it all. The world No 1 knows he’s got it.”
The former world semi-finalist highlighted Littler’s calm confidence after lifting the trophy, particularly his casual remark that it was “another one ticked off” his list. “What I admire about him is the way he just says it’s another one ticked off,” Mardle added. “And when he was talking about being world No 1, he says, ‘I’ll get there’. There is no doubt in his mind about what he can achieve. There’s no ceiling to it. Everything he does or seemingly wants to do, he does achieve in the end.”
Read also
Mardle admitted Littler’s rise has been remarkable to witness. “It is ridiculous him being 18, but you can actually forget that now, because it doesn’t seem to matter that he’s so young,” he said. “He’s still new to the sport, but he’s not new to winning."
“He’s not new to all these things that are happening to him. More has happened to him, positively, in his career than ever happened in mine and many other players’," Mardle added. "He’s done so much more than those who’ve thrown for 40 years. He is a generational talent. He’s amazing, and he dismantled the world No 1. That’s how good he is.”
Littler now adds the World Grand Prix trophy to his growing cabinet – a notoriously tricky event played under the double-in, double-out format that often trips up even the best. Yet the teenager barely flinched, dismantling Humphries, who finished runner-up for the second consecutive year. The win brings Littler to within just £70,000 of top spot in the world rankings – still held, for now, by Humphries.
ADVERTISEMENT
Humphries shows class in defeat
After the loss, Humphries showed his trademark honesty and humility. Speaking to Sky Sports, the reigning world champion admitted he’ll need to raise his game to stop Littler from running away with everything. “I’ve got to go away, I’ve got to practise, get better,” he said. “Otherwise he’s going to win it all.”
Mardle called Humphries’ post-match reaction one of the best interviews he’s ever heard from any sportsman. “Luke Littler is very good, but Luke Humphries is the world No 1,” he said. “He’s literally saying that Littler’s better right now, but he’s going to do all he can to hang on to that top spot and improve over the coming months and years. The way he reacted in defeat was admirable.”
He was quick to point out that the 6–1 scoreline didn’t tell the whole story. “Let’s get it right,” Mardle continued. “Luke Humphries has been doing it under pressure as well, but someone else did it to him tonight. He just failed to play well in those last-leg deciders, and that was all it was. You can’t rip his performance apart – it was good, just not quite as good at the right moments as Luke Littler. That was all.”
The result made it six major televised finals between the two Lukes, further underlining their growing dominance at the top of the sport.
ADVERTISEMENT
“The two Lukes could dominate darts for years”
Mardle believes the “monopoly” between Littler and Humphries could define darts for the next several seasons. “Two years ago, neither of them had won a thing,” he said. “Luke Littler wasn’t on the PDC Tour and Luke Humphries hadn’t won anything except a couple of Pro Tour events. Twenty-two months later, look at what they’ve achieved. There’s no reason why they can’t do that for another two to four years.”
But while the pair may currently lead the way, Mardle was quick to acknowledge that darts never stands still. “We know there’s going to be another phenom coming around the corner because it happens really quickly,” he said. “There are others – Josh Rock, Gerwyn Price, Michael van Gerwen could come back – and the monopoly may stop. But champions find a way. These two find a way so often.”
Read also
ADVERTISEMENT

Kieran WoodDarts Journalist
Kieran Wood is a sports journalist based in Wales and has been active in journalism since 2022. He contributes to DartsNews.com, where he covers professional darts through news, match reports, analysis, and live coverage across the PDC calendar and major tournaments.
A key part of his work is on-site reporting from leading events. Kieran has covered the PDC World Darts Championship in person, reporting daily from the venue and providing first-hand insight from the tournament. During his coverage, he has conducted interviews with leading players including Luke Littler, Luke Humphries, and Gerwyn Price.
He is also one of the leading voices of the English-language Dartsnews Podcast, contributing regular analysis and discussion on developments across the professional darts circuit.
In his reporting, Kieran places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating articles when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







