"Was looking to see where Matt Porter was, because I think steam was coming out of his ears": MIchael van Gerwen was laughing his head off at power cut before Bahrain win
PDC
Michael van Gerwen had nothing to prove, he said himself. And yet his victory at the Bahrain Darts Masters felt like a statement. The 36-year-old Dutchman beat his compatriot Gian van Veen 8-6 in the final in Sakhir.
ADVERTISEMENT
After a spell in which he missed out on trophies more often than he was used to, the Dutchman was back on a TV stage with a major title in his hands. The winner of the World Series event in Bahrain spoke afterwards with a relaxed smile, but also clear conviction: he is far from done.
“It always feels good, especially when you win,” Van Gerwen said post final. “Of course, it wasn’t too easy today. I made it a little bit difficult here and there for myself, but I think overall I played some really good darts today, and that made me win games like this.”
Focus and old class
What stood out throughout the tournament was Van Gerwen’s sharpness. His combination finishing, in particular, looked back to its old standard – something he readily acknowledged.
“I felt good. Otherwise, you don’t win games like this,” he said. “You have to perform on the highest level here, because you play against the top players. All the seeded players went through to the final day, so you need to make sure you keep battling.”
Holding that focus, he felt, was crucial. In recent months, winning positions had slipped away in big matches. This time, there was no repeat.
ADVERTISEMENT
“I’ve learned from my mistakes,” Van Gerwen smiled. “I didn’t do that today, did I?”
The joke carried a serious edge. Self-criticism without panic has been key.
“Sometimes when things don’t go your way, you need to keep believing in your ability,” he said. “That’s what I always do.”
No farewell to the top
Winning the first televised tournament of the new year was also significant after what some had labelled a difficult season. Van Gerwen was quick to push back on that narrative.
ADVERTISEMENT
“Not the worst year possible – it wasn’t the worst year ever. Simple as that,” he said.
Still, the impact of the win was clear. “It gives you confidence,” he explained. “You don’t know how it’s going to set you up, but it gives you definite confidence. It gives you joy, it gives you pleasure and it calms you down. I think I can show a lot more.”
Asked whether the victory was a reminder to the darts world, Van Gerwen was clear about his motivation. “I’m not coming here to Bahrain to not perform,” he said. “That’s the only thing I love about darts – playing on the big stages and winning tournaments. It’s the best feeling you can have.”
The sport, of course, is evolving quickly, with younger stars emerging at pace. Van Gerwen acknowledged that reality without hesitation. “I think at the moment it’s safe to say that the best player in the world is Luke Littler,” he said. “Where do you put me? That’s for you to decide. I’m not going to answer that.”
ADVERTISEMENT
His on-stage comment – “don’t forget me” – was, he insisted, light-hearted. “I just love to say it,” he laughed. “Everyone knows me.”
Fitter, sharper and hungry
Alongside his form, Van Gerwen’s physical condition has also drawn attention. He admits there is still work to do. “I’m not there where I want to be yet,” he said. “I want to lose another half a stone, but take it easy – not too quickly. I feel good, I feel comfortable and I’m enjoying my life as well.”
Balancing performance, health and an ever-expanding calendar remains a challenge.“The tour gets busier all the time, so you need to make sure you also look after yourself,” he said. “It’s not always easy because you play late at night and in different circumstances.”
Modern darts, he feels, demands that extra effort. “We all know where darts came from and where it is now. We’re making incredible steps, but you need to try to do one step extra, and that’s what I’m trying to do for myself as well.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Experience versus youth
Despite being just 36, Van Gerwen sometimes feels like one of the veterans. “Sometimes I feel like an old man on the tour,” he joked. “I’m only 36 years old, but I’ve been there for so long already.”
Experience, though, still counts. "As long as I keep improving myself and try to deliver the good Michael on the stage all the time, and keep trying to do a little bit more, that’s the only thing I can do.”
Michael van Gerwen defeated Gian van Veen in the final of the Bahrain Darts Masters 2026
Even when the power briefly failed in the arena, Van Gerwen remained relaxed. “I was behind the stage laughing my head off,” he said. “I was looking to see where Matt Porter was, because I think steam was coming out of his ears. The generator blew – what could I do?”
ADVERTISEMENT
Trophies, travel and perspective
Another win also meant another trophy to take home.
“I like things like this – a nice little gold one,” Van Gerwen said. “I even still have the one from two years ago at my house, so I’ll put this next to it.”
Attention now turns quickly to Saudi Arabia and the chance of back-to-back World Series titles.
“That would be nice,” he said. “That’s a while ago. It happened before, but I can’t remember when it happened.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Travel, as ever, is part of the job. “I’ve been flying all the time, but that’s my life,” he said. “If you keep moaning, it doesn’t really help you. You need to look at the good side.”
Finally, there was the question of the Dutch number one ranking, now held by Gian van Veen. “Let him be the Dutch number one,” Van Gerwen said. “I had that badge on my back for the last 15 years.”
Conclusion
The Bahrain Darts Masters title may be ‘only’ a World Series win, but the message behind it is clear. Michael van Gerwen looks calmer, fitter and just as driven as ever. In a sport moving quickly towards the next generation, he has reminded everyone that experience and mentality still matter.
Or, as he put it himself, with a smile: “Don’t forget me.”
ADVERTISEMENT
Samuel GillChief Content Officer
Samuel Gill is the Chief Content Officer (CCO) of DartsNews.com, a role he has held since 2020. He is responsible for editorial governance across the platform, including setting content standards, overseeing accuracy and consistency, and guiding long-term editorial strategy across professional darts coverage. Since joining, he has contributed more than 10,000 articles and editorial pieces, playing a central role in the development and daily operation of the site.
Based in Leicester, Samuel has extensive experience in darts media and has been closely involved in coverage of the professional darts circuit for several years. Within the UK darts community, he is a recognised figure known for his consistent editorial output and ongoing reporting on major tournaments and developments across the PDC calendar.
In his current role, Samuel works closely with editors and writers to ensure content meets clear journalistic standards, with a focus on source verification, editorial consistency, and timely updates when new, confirmed information becomes available.
claps 2visitors 2
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026
- No point in being there? Champions want to win.Deduce635828-10-2026