WDF World Championship Saturday evening Round-up | Jimmy van Schie gets off to winning start as Mikuru Suzuki marks return to Lakeside with victory
WDFThe number one seed Jimmy van Schie ended the Saturday
evening session in the WDF World Championship with a decent 3-0 win against
Alex Williams.
ADVERTISEMENT
He began by taking out 80 in two before following with a
15-dart break. Another one soon came along but climaxing with a 120 checkout as
van Schie breezed through the early stages against his Welsh opponent.
The tall Dutchman was not able to reach down to double two
as Williams had his first chances at double. They both eventually ended up in
the madhouse where Williams finally got on the board, followed by a sarcastic
celebration. He then missed tops for a 106 checkout and found himself level again.
After busting 81, van Schie made no mistake the next time. It looked like he
was going to go 2-0 ahead but Williams had other ideas, taking out 126 on the
bull. He then missed six set darts as the World Masters champion pinned double
18. It was a similar situation to William’s round-one clash against Romeo Grbavac.
Whilst he completed the comeback yesterday, lightning did not strike twice at
Lakeside. Williams ran into a 2-1 lead and missed set darts, but van Schie was
there to end William’s debut at the event.
Read also
Suzuki makes triumphant return
Once more, Baby Shark was blasted in Lakeside as Mikuru
Suzuki made a highly anticipated return. She is a two-time world champion and bestows
a lot of respect and honour in women’s darts. She managed to get the better of
Kirsi Viinikainen 2-0.
After they both pinned tops to get a leg on the board, Viinikainen
missed double 18 for a 114 checkout and a break, with Suzuki holding. The
Japanese darter was sat on 56 for the set but Viinikainen clinically took out
82 in two to force a deciding leg. Fortunately for Suzuki, she got the edge to propel
her closer to the next round.
It looked like she would continue to run away from her
opponent. After breaking the throw, she missed a dart at top for a 120. Viinikainen
was there to pounce on the mistake, brilliantly taking out 118 on double 19. She
followed it up with a 115 outshot before double 10 was cooly found by the Finn
to level up affairs. Whoever took the last set would set up a tie with Deta Hedman.
Suzuki was up to the task, taking out 97 in two before pinning double 18 to
move one away. She completed this with a 110 checkout to fend off a very tricky
opponent.
ADVERTISEMENT

Mikuru Suzuki is a two-time world champion
Masalin wins on debut
Kicking off the evening’s action, Jonas Masalin marked his
debut at Lakeside with a 3-1 win over Ryan Hogarth. Masalin almost began in terrific
fashion, missing tops for a 105 checkout. He was able to come back to pin
double ten for a crucial break. He backed that up with an 18-darter on the same
target. The Scot got a leg on the board on double 16 but wasted numerous opportunities
on the outer ring. The Finland native punished him and took the first set. More
sloppiness from Hogarth allowed Masalin to hold but he managed to level instantly
after. A 13-darter put Masalin in the driving seat but was upstaged by a
12-darter by Hogarth after 121 was taken out on the bull. The world class darts
was prolonged with another 13-darter from Masalin to go 2-0 ahead. The ‘HeadHunter’
found a no-look 180 enroute to getting his first leg on the board but was in
for a whitewash fourth set as Masalin advanced. For Hogarth, it was more disappointment
in Frimley Green as he walked off the stage without shaking the referee’s hand.
Daniel Bauerick survived numerous match darts as he
completed a mesmerising comeback to defeat Karl Schaefer 3-2. Bauerdick flew
out of the blocks, taking a 2-0 lead amid a whole host of missed doubles. Schaefer
dragged himself back in it as he broke straight back but two missed darts at
double 18 opened the door for the German to clinch the first set. It was a
well-needed response from the Aussie, who broke the throw before showing his
opponent how to take out 84. He swiftly levelled up before breaking to go 2-1
up in the third, inevitably taking the overall lead of the tie after taking out
76 in three. The routing would continue as Schaefer’s lead grew. Bauerdick mounted
a fightback but missed a number of darts to take the set. The Aussie made no
mistake on double 16. From then it should have been the end for Bauerdick, but
he was offered a second chance after six match darts were missed. The match
would go to a fifth set, which was kicked off by a tops-tops finish by
Bauerdick to ahead. This would put him on the road to success, as he progressed
into the next round.
Maria Carli produced a solid display to dispose of former
semi-finalist Irina Armstrong 2-1. Carli looked on top in the early stages, finding
a 13-darter to take a 2-0 lead. She missed five doubles to go a set to the good
as Armstrong, in her first chances at the outer ring, took her rare
opportunity. She would the take authority on her throw to force a showdown for
the set, which the Canadian took with open arms on double 10. She should have
broken the throw instantly but had a mere on the outer ring, subsequently
allowing her rival to hold. This would come back to bite her. The pressure of a
180 would not faze Armstrong one bit as she pinned tops for a level tie. The Canadian
was the one to prevail. Her scoring saw her create more chances which she took.
It was a sketchy ending for both players. Carli ended up in the madhouse after
missing ten match darts, along with Armstrong having the chance to prolong this
tie, but she just about managed to scramble over the finishing line.
ADVERTISEMENT
Read also
Sparidaans pips Raman in decider
Jeffrey Sparidaans and Brian Raman were involved in a very
even match which went the full distance, but it was Sparidaans who triumphed
3-2. Raman made Sparidaans rue missed doubles to break in the opening stages
but was reeled back instantly by the Dutchman with a 16-darter. Another break
for the Belgian followed by more misery trying to complete the legs. Sparidaans
prolonged the breaks before culminating them with a 15-dart hold to take the
set. The breaks kept coming in the second set. Sparidaans continued his
positive form by going ahead before a 116 checkout from Raman kept him on par.
He would then be punished for missing chances to hold as the Dutchman went on
to take the second set. Raman was not going down without a fight, as he took
out 115 and 112 enroute to firmly putting himself back in contention. Despite
finding himself a break down in the fourth set, Raman took out notable finishes
of 94 and 76 before sneaking ahead to his opponent to force a one-set shootout.
Four holds saw a tense final-leg decider. In the end, the reigning Dutch Open
champion proved to have the winning cards. He took out 87 on double five to
secure a gritty victory.

Lucas MichaelDarts Journalist
Lucas Michael is a darts journalist and reporter based in Cambridge, UK, and has been part of the DartsNews team since 2025. He covers professional darts through reports, analysis, round-ups, and live coverage, with a focus on clear context and accurate reporting across the PDC calendar.
A key part of his work is liveblogging major tournaments throughout the year, providing real-time updates, match coverage, and contextual reporting across the professional circuit. He also reports regularly from events on site and has covered the PDC World Darts Championship from the venue, delivering first-hand insight throughout the tournament.
Within the newsroom, Lucas works closely with the editorial team and supports coverage alongside Chief Content Officer Samuel Gill and reporter Kieran Wood.
Lucas holds a BA (Hons) in Sports Journalism. In his work, he places strong emphasis on careful sourcing, editorial accuracy, and updating content promptly when new, verified information becomes available.
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- And why should he listen to you?Deduce635807-11-2026
- Ultimately it is a bye for whoever draws Barney. It will be another stroppy and sulky performance once he goes behind. Barney was excellent but really must completely call it a day now.richieburnettrocks07-11-2026
- I'm disappointed he was not able to secure a spot at the Grand Slam. With Carl Sneyd taking care of Daryl Gurney, he would have had to beat Andy Boulton before facing the winner of Sneyd vs Mensur Suljović for a Grand Slam spot. Unfortunately, after beating Filip Bereza comfortably, he succumbed to Boulton, and the board would ultimately be won by the highly inconsistent Carl Sneyd. Since he could instead have been drawn against the likes of Cristo Reyes, Dirk van Duijvenbode and Stephen Bunting, I think once Gurney was out of the picture he would have been favourite to win his board, and it seems like a massive missed opportunity to put 5 grand on his ranking and seal another major TV appearance ahead of the Worlds. The highs and lows of following Raymond van Barneveld!Deduce635806-11-2026
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026







