BDO World Darts Championship 2020 Men's Final preview: Jim Williams vs Wayne Warren
BDO World Darts Championship
What do 1978, 1995, 2008 and 2020 have in common? A lot, if we're talking about the BDO World Darts Championship.
ADVERTISEMENT
The first world champion, Leighton Rees, hailed from Wales. His 1978 success was matched 17 years later by Richie Burnett. Three decades on from Rees' inaugural triumph, Mark Webster took the title. And now, another Welshman will win the BDO World Darts Championship. We can only hope that this is no grim narrative where the trophy heading to Cymru bookends the history of this famous competition.
First, it'd be remiss not to mention the two world champions already crowned. Mikuru Suzuki was brilliantly ruthless in doing what nobody else can; beating Lisa Ashton comfortably. Of course, the 3-0 scoreline was a little harsh on the Lancashire Rose. But Suzuki seems to be unstoppable at the BDO World Darts Championship, and her win makes her the fourth winner of multiple women's titles. She's the only woman to appear in at least one final without losing, and the fourth person overall to do so after Phil Taylor, Jocky Wilson and Glen Durrant - esteemed company, indeed.
The youth final went much the same way. Keane Barry, a class above all year, was the same again on the Indigo stage. Darting stardom seems inevitable for the fast-flinging Irish sensation. It wasn't to be this year for Leighton Bennett against a player he'd do well to use as a benchmark. Barry has three years on Bennett, and the English youngster had the 2019 title already. By the time he's 17 years old, Boom Boom might well eclipse the player who takes the bragging rights this time around. We'll see plenty more of these two.
But it's Jim Williams and Wayne Warren who are the focus on Sunday. Two Welshmen, two players in their first final, and two men who might not ever defend this title, should they win it. It's bound to be an emotional final.
Can Williams live up to his destiny?
When Glen Durrant switched to the PDC, it was expected that good friend Jim Williams would step into that massive chasm left by the three-time, back-to-back world champion. Those shoes are hard to fill, but the Quiff is on the cusp of doing just that.
ADVERTISEMENT
Having won the World Trophy in the summer, Williams came into this tournament with some major-winning pedigree. Expectations were high - but his World Darts Championship chances were almost dashed at the first hurdle by Gary Stone. Williams, very much playing his B-game, survived.
The 35-year-old felt that conditions on stage weren't quite right for that game. As if to prove it, he improved markedly in the next game, where the lighting wasn't such a distraction. Ryan Hogarth and Paul Hogan were simply cast aside. Once Wesley Harms and Richard Veenstra departed, the second seed became the bona fide favourite.
What Williams needed to show his credentials was the chance to mix the bloody-minded determination that accounted for Stone with the classy darts that dazzled Hogarth and Hogan. In his 6-4 semi-final success against Mario Vandenbogaerde, he got just that. The Belgian refused to lay down; Williams kept punching until he got the KO. Even in spite of victory against an excellent opponent, he'll know that he can do much better. He may need to do better in order to see off his final opponent.
Now the World Darts Championship title awaits, and Duzza's chosen heir looks to fulfil his darting destiny.
ADVERTISEMENT
Warren the golden oldie targets record
In January 2018, Phil Taylor became the oldest ever World Darts Championship finalist. Two years on, Wayne Warren just about edges the record. Can he do what even The Power couldn't, and become world champion at 57 years old?
This is Warren's third World Championship in a row, having played at just two before - in 2005 and 2013. He may have plenty of experience in darts, but at the highest level of all, he's had to learn on the job.
The Yank was way off the pace against Justin Thompson, and was almost punished. It's a story similar to Williams', and the parallels run through the tournament. Andy Hamilton and Chris Landman were obliterated; Scott Mitchell was never going to make it easy, but Warren saved his best legs for the right times and won out.
The fifth seed is known as a prodigiously strong scorer on his day. What wasn't clear was whether he could put every element of his game together to take himself all the way. Now Warren finds himself in the World Darts Championship final - and he'll be more confident than anyone about his chances. Whatever happens, he's immortalised in darting history.
ADVERTISEMENT
Pride of Wales
On paper, Williams is the favourite. Anyone who has reached the semi-finals (at least) in six out of the last seven majors will be seen as someone who knows how to handle the big occasion.
His knack for starting games well (perhaps with the exception of the Stone match, in which he fluffed a chance to go 2-0 up) and Warren's trend of building into a match more slowly suggests that the Quiff could hit the ground running.
But that's no guarantee. What we do know is that both have got better as they've gone on, perhaps peaking with their semi-final wins.
ADVERTISEMENT
What tips the balance Warren's way is that, in addition to his scoring (28 maximums in his last two games), he has found more consistency in finishing. The slew of missed doubles that held up his win over Landman was replaced by a 58 per cent checkout success rate against Mitchell.
Overall, Williams is the more consistent player; Warren is as prone to fireworks as he is to a damp squib. The latter's unpredictability makes this final a bit harder to call.
After this tournament, both will move on - likely to Q-School. We don't know how many of the Indigo alumni will return in a year. We don't even know if there'll be a tournament in a year's time.
All the more reason to enjoy this ride while it lasts.
ADVERTISEMENT
BDO World Darts Championship 2020 schedule
Sunday January 12 (starts 19:00)
Jim Williams vs Wayne Warren (Men's Final)
claps 0visitors 0
Just in
Popular news
Latest comments
- Probably i will receive a lot of backlash and hate for this reaction, but well, so be it. I am more than sick and tired of those lies of you Barry Hearn. How dare you defend yourself over the back of Fallon’s son! He has a disability and not an illness, so let me correct that for you! I know because I have the exact same disability. I have tried to reach out to Fallon in the past, and offered her to help her and her son, because I was struggling with the same problems, and I understood the boy. I wanted him to have finally someone who understood him. However she told me that she did not want my help, and I have respected Fallon’s choice. I have never asked Fallon for money. They don’t need money in that case. I only ever wanted the best for Fallon and Rory, but I have to be honest about the situation. Fallon should tell the true story and not be forced to tell lies. I don’t hate Fallon, and I don’t begrudge or envy a single penny that she gets, but this situation/case is just not fair. I hate the lies and the dishonesty and injustice. I don’t want Fallon to be hated because there is an unfair disadvantage created. Don’t proclaim your false lies over the back of Rory! I only stand for integrity and justice. I am precisely the one who always sticks up for Fallon. And you don't, you don't give a damn about them. You were never there for them, and now you only want to save your own position! You are just trying to talk your way out of your own bad behavior at the expense of someone with a disability. And to Fallon, I don’t know if this may ever reach you, and you read it, but I want you to know I love you and I love your son Rory very much, I am sorry how things developed and went. I hope you and Harriet are still friends. I am sorry if I were too persistent to you, or you experienced it that way, but it was never my intention. Please understand I have autism as well. As Barry Hearn would say, I am only just a human being too, and I also make mistakes and misjudge things sometimes. I promise you I did everything out of the deepest love and care for you and Rory. If I were you, I should just keep all the money, only please never be dishonest or tell lies anymore for Barry Hearn, or anyone else. I hope you have the best life, and I wish nothing more than the best for you. I have always loved the two of you. Farewell.Hiddo05-11-2026
- She is a professional. If darts is her income, she is a professional. Same as Adrian Lewis, Martin Adams. A tour card just means someone can play on the PDC tour. You could even make a case that Clayton wasn't a professional (until recently I believe) because he had employment elsewhere.BandB04-11-2026
- She's technically not a professional though as she doesn't hold a pro tour card.mr-pablo04-11-2026
- Such a shame that lakeside has been reduced to this. Fantastic venue,and previously a great tournament. Not any morerick6703-11-2026
- Seems to me that the top 16 players pick and choose whatever they want to play. Good,all the money will get spread out more. They get more money from exhibitions than tournaments so let them all withdrawrick6703-11-2026
- Play all legs and the winners split the pot. Luke gets the lot of he wins them all. If your occupation is darts player you can't enter, regardless of ability.BandB01-11-2026
- I'm quite a jaded person all things considered, but to be honest I found Beat Luke Littler to be pretty entertaining. It certainly wasn't seamless, which is to be expected given the lack of precedence, but I actually think the pacing was pretty good, the production was impressive, and there was a good sense of humour and levity to it. I think it was a very ambitious undertaking but one that, for the most part, paid off. I liked the system with the four pots and I think it added to the drama and intrigue. I enjoyed seeing the diverse range of entrants and learning about their backstories. I think the interactivity was pretty clever and well-integrated. The panel was a little incoherent at times; Lee Mack shone however, and his improvisational skills were appreciated during some more awkward interstitial moments. As far as the darts is concerned, it was a shame that the format didn't allow Littler to get into full flow. You obviously don't want him to steamroll everyone but you want to feel like you're getting the full Littler package rather than seeing him struggling to get out of first gear. I will say that his leg against Jayden Walker was very impressive, but it was mostly downhill from there. The attraction revolves around Littler being this untouchable, indomitable force, yet the format doesn't really allow him to fulfil that characterisation. As for Fallon Sherrock, she was mightily impressive and deserved the victory. It is a testament to her unshakeable character that she was able to bang in a 14-darter under such mind-bending pressure. Everything that has been said about the misleading marketing is valid, though they were clear about their eligibility criteria and were able to offload the responsibility somewhat by bringing the viewers into the decision-making process in real time. What is clear though, is that Fallon played the game according to the rules, and she should not be criticised for that, much less abused. I will admit though that it is a kick in the teeth for those true amateurs who committed time and money to the course, and I would also question those who think pub players would have no chance, given that some of Littler's winning legs were dispatched in 7 visits to the board! The great thing about darts is that it isn't so much that amateurs cannot replicate the feats of brilliance pulled off by professionals of the sport, than it is that they simply cannot replicate the consistency of their output, something that this format almost entirely removes from the equation. It should also be noted that, financially, Fallon certainly stands to benefit much less in relative terms from the paycheque than would your average pub thrower, as I'm sure she nets a fair income from the lucrative exhibition circuit alone. What I do hope is that she might use this as an opportunity to really build up a head of steam heading into the new season, as it seems long overdue that she come through Q-School and really take it to the pros on a week-in week-out basis, but whatever she chooses to do, she has certainly achieved enough already for one if not several lifetimes, so who am I to dictate terms? To conclude though, I will state once again that I found Beat Luke Littler to be a pretty enjoyable evening of entertainment. I do feel for the contestants who never actually had the chance to try their luck against the world #1, although I suppose it comes with the format, but all which inevitably raises the question: will Netflix be tempted to do it all again next year? It's hard to say. Whether it would be financially viable, I can't weigh in there. One point I have been making though, and which I touched on earlier, is that the entire concept relies on a public perception that Littler is more or less unbeatable, and that certainly hasn't been the case of late. If the execs had been trying to pitch the show in recent months while Littler has seemed vulnerable, rather than when he was mopping up almost every major title on the calendar, it would certainly be a tougher sell. We will have to see in about 6 months' time whether Littler can still reliably command perception as a near-unstoppable force in darts, and then we'll have a clearer idea about whether we should expect a second helping. Even as a one-off experiment though, and with all the controversy taken into account, I still don't think they disgraced themselves by any means, and that will probably be my lingering assessment of the event when all is said and done.Deduce635801-11-2026
- Fair play to Fallon. But...shows the mockery when a professional players wins what was meant to be an amateur v Pro event, Littlers performance was poor, and what about the players who didn't get a game? Would have been better if the pot was split amoungst all the winners and they all got a leg.BandB31-10-2026
- Not even slightly interestedrick6730-10-2026
- And yet the PDC has decided to aggravate this problem by doubling the Players Championship Finals field from 2027. I can't imagine there will be fewer withdrawals next year with even less reason to turn up. I can only hope that a whole slew of Challenge Tour top-up players receive enough prize money in the absence of much of the elite, that some of the more complacent among them struggle to scrape into even a heavily diluted field! More semi-pro players will get to test their mettle, but the standard of competition will be much inferior. It could hardly be said that the Players Championship series will provide an opportunity for darts' second string to test their Tour Card credentials anymore, but at least it will underscore the achievements of those Challenge Tour players of current and previous years, who were able to prove themselves as more than capable of competing with, and beating, the elite of the sport on a consistent basis, and reaping the due rewards.Deduce635828-10-2026





